Podrobná studijní literatura

Transkript

Podrobná studijní literatura
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Základní literatura
Beneš, J. 1994: Člověk. Praha: Mladá fronta.
Budil, I. T. 1998: Mýtus, jazyk a kulturní antropologie. Praha.
David, N. – Kramerová, C. 2001: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Harris, M. 1968: The Rise of Anthropological Theory. New York, London: Harper & Row,
publishers.
Hubinger, V. – Honzák, F. – Polišenský, J. 1985: Národy celého světa. Praha: Mladá fronta.
Hrdý, L. – Soukup, V. – Vodáková, A. 1994: Sociální a kulturní antropologie (slovník).
Praha.
Kottak, C. P. 2003 (10. vydání): Cultural Anthropology. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Murphy, R. F. 1998: Úvod do kulturní a sociální antropologie. Praha (1989 třetí vydání,
Cultural and Social Anthropology. An Overture).
Orme, B. 1981: Anthropology for archaeologists. Gerald Duckworth. London.
Renfrew, C. – Bahn, P. 1991: Archaeology. Theories, Method and Practice. Thames and
Hudson Ltd. London.
Soukup, V. 1996: Dějiny sociální a kulturní antropologie. Univerzita Karlova. Praha.
Wyn Davies, M. - Piero 2003: Kulturní antropologie. Praha (2002 Anthropology).
Literatura k vývoji antropologického myšlení (české překlady).
Benedictová, R. 1999: Kulturní vzorce. Nakl. Argo. Praha. (1934: Patterns of culture, Boston
– New York).
Geertz, C. 2000: Interpretace kultur. Vybrané eseje. Sociologické nakladatelství. Praha.
(1973: The interpratations of cultures. Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz, New
York).
Goodallová, J. 1978: Ve stínu člověka. Mladá fronta - edice Kolumbus. Praha. (1971, In the
Shadow of Man, London).
Gould, S. J. 1988: Pandin palec. Mladá fronta – edice Kolumbus. Praha. (1980, The panda′s
thumb, New York).
Lévy-Bruhl, L. 1999: Myšlení člověka primitivního. Nakl. Argo. Praha. (1925, La mentalité
primitive, Librairie Félix Alcan. Paris).
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1966: Smutné tropy. Nakl. Odeon. Praha. (1955, Les tristes tropiques,
Librairie Plon. Paris).
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1995: Příběh Rysa. Nakl. Orientace. Praha. (1991, Histoire de Lynx,
Librairie Plon. Paris).
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1996: Myšlení přírodních národů. Nakl. Dauphin. Praha. (1966, La pensée
sauvage, Librairie Plon. Paris).
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1996: Cesta masek. Dauphin. Praha. (1979, La voite des masques, Librairie
Plon. Paris).
Lévi-Strauss, C. 2000: Štrukturálna antropológia I. a II. Nakl. Kalligram. Bratislava. (1973,
Antropologie structurale I., II. , Librairie Plon. Paris).
Malinowski, B. 1968: Vědecká teorie kultury. Krajské kulturní středisko. Brno. (1944, A
scientific theory of culture).
Pospíšil, L. 1997: Etnologie práva. Teze ke studiu práva z mezikulturní perspektivy. Set out.
Praha. (1978. The Ethnology of Law).
Salzman, Z. 1997: Jazyk, kultura a společnost. Český lid – suplement. Praha.
Soukup, V. 2000: Přehled antropologických teorií kultury. Nakl. Portál. Praha.
van Genep, A. 1997: Přechodové rituály. Nakladatelství Lidové noviny. Praha. (1909, Les
rites de passage, étude systematique des rites. Émile Nourry. Paris).
Wilson, E. O. 1993: O lidské přirozenosti. Praha.
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Literatura ke vztahu antropologie-archeologie a vzniku etnoarcheologie.
Binford, L. 1962: Archaeology as anthropology. American antiquity 28, 217-225.
Binford, L. 1978: Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic
Press.
Bouzek, J. 2000: Archeologie a humanitní vědy, AR 52, 409 – 411.
Clarke, D. L. 1968: Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.
Flannery, K.V. (ed.) 1976: The early Mesoamerican village: Archaeological research strategy
for an endangered species. Academic Press. New York, San Francisco, London.
Flannery, K.V. – Coe, M.D. 1968: Social and economic systems in Formative Mesoamerica,
In: Binford, S. R. – Binford, R. L. (eds.): New perspectives in archaeology. Chicago:
Aldine.
Gojda, M. 1992: Postprocesualismus a jeho vliv na koncepci středověké archeologie, AR
44, 277 – 293.
Gould, R. A. 1980: Living archaeology. Cambridge University Press. New York.
Hodder, I. 1982: The present past. An Introduction to Anthropology for Archaeologist.
London: B.T.Batsford Ltd.
Hodder, I. 1993: Post-processual archaeology, Archeologické rozhledy 45, 367-374 (s
diskusními příspěvky).
Lee, R. B. – DeVore, I. (eds.) 1968: Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine.
Longacre, W. A. 1981: Kalinga pottery: an ethnoarchaeological study. IN: Hodder, I. – Isaac,
G. – Hammond, N. (eds.): Pottery of the past: studies in honour of David Clark.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–66.
Kuna, M. 2000: Česká archeologie v postmoderní době, AR 52, 404 – 408.
Kuna, M. 1985: Hodder, I., Symbols in action. Ethnoarchaeological studies of material
culture, Cambridge 1982. Památky archeologické 76, 252-256.
Kuna, M. 1986: Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge 1982, 188
stran s obr. Památky archeologické 77, 249-256.
Malina, J. 1980: Archeologie včera a dnes aneb mají archeologové šedé hmoty více za
nehty než za ušima? Jihočeské muzeum v Českých Budějovicích.
Sahlins, M. 1972: Stone Age economics, Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Schiffer, M. B. 1987: Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record, Albuquerque:
University of New Mexiko Press.
Ucko, P. J. – Tringham, R. – Dimbleby, G. W. (ed.) 1972: Man, settlement and urbanism.
London: Duckworth.
Vencl, S. 2001: Souvislosti chápání pojmu “nálezový celek” v české archeologii, AR 53,
592 – 614 (pro danou problematiku stránky 592 – 594).
Watson, P.J. 1979: Archaeological ethnography in western Iran. Viking Fund Publications in
Anthropology 57. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Yellen, J. E. 1977: Archaeological approaches to the present: Models for reconstructing the
past. New York, London: Academic Press.
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Literatura ke formativním procesům archeologického materiálu.
prostorový rozměr odpadu:
Cameron, C. – Tomka, S. (eds.): Abandonment of settlements and regions, Cambridge
University Pres, 178 – 187.
David, N. – Kramer, C. 2001: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge.
DeBoer, W. R. – Lathrap, D. W. 1979: The making and breaking of Shipibo-Conibo
ceramics. IN: Krammer, C. (ed): Ethnoarchaeology implications of ethnography for
archaeology, Columbia University Press. New York. 102 – 138.
Gould, R. A. 1978: The Anthropology of Human Residues. American Anthropologist 80/4,
815 – 835.
Hayden, B. – Cannon, A. 1983: Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya
Highlands, Journal of anthropological archaeology 2, 117 – 163.
LaMotta, V. M. – Schiffer, M. B. 2001: Behavioral Archaeology. Toward a New Synthesis.
IN: Hodder, I. (ed.): Archaeological Theory Today. Polity Press. Cambridge.
Rathje, W. 1974: The garbage project. A new way of looking at the problems of archaeology,
Archaeology 27, 236 – 241.
Schiffer, M. B. 1972: Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity 37,
156-165.
- 1976: Behavioral archaeology. Academic Press, New York.
- 1987: Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record, University of New Mexiko
Press, Albuquerque.
Sommer, U. 1991: Zur entstehung archäologischer fundvergesellschaftungen verzuch einer
arechäologischen taphonomie, Studien zur siedlungsarchäologie I, Band 6, 53-174
Staski, E. – Sutro, L. D. (eds.) 1991: The Ethnoarchaeology of Refuse Disposal. Arizona State
University.
časový rozměr odpadu:
Kazdová, E. 1998: Poznámky k intruzím keramiky v neolitických sídlištních objektech IN:
Otázky neolitu a eneolitu našich zemí, Turnov - Hradec Králové, str. 60-70.
Kuna, M. 2002: Intruze jako doklad "nenalezených" fází pravěkého osídlení. IN: Neustupný
E. (ed.) Archeologie nenalézaného. Sborník přátel, kolegů a žáků k životnímu jubileu
Slavomila Vencla. Dobrá Voda, Aleš Čeněk,108-118.
Květina, P. 2002: Příspěvek k otázce formativních procesů archeologického materiálu, IN:
Bylany Varia 2, 21-38.
Last, J. 1998: The Residue of Yesterday´s Existence: Settlement Space and Discard at
Miskovice and Bylany. Bylany Varia 1, 17-45.
Macháček, J. 2001: Studie k velkomoravské keramice. Metody, analýzy a syntézy, modely.
Brno.
Neustupný, E. 1996: Poznámky k pravěké sídlištní keramice, AR 48/3, str. 490-509.
Pavlů, I. 1977: K metodice analýzy sídlišť s lineární keramikou, PA 68/1, str. 5-55.
Rulf, J. 1997: Intruze keramiky. Příspěvek ke kritice pramenů, AR 49/3, str. 439-461.
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Literatura ke studiu artefaktů – funkce, operační řetězce, taxonomie, styl.
David, N. – Kramer, C. 2001: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge – kapitola 6 a 7
Funkce, technologie
Carneiro, R. L. 1979: Tree felling with stone ax: an experiment carried out among Yanomamö
Indians of Venezuela. IN: Kramer, C. (ed.): Ethnoarchaeology: implications of
ethnography for archaeology, New York: Columbia University Press, 21-58.
Clark, J. D. – Kurashina, H. 1981: A study of the work of a modern tanner in Ethiopia and its
relevance for archaeological interpretations. IN: Gould, R. A. – Schiffer, M. B.
(eds.): Modern material culture: the archaeology of us, New York? Academic Press,
303-321.
Dietler, M. – Herbich, I. 1998: Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social
understanding of material culture and boundaries. IN: M. T. Stark (ed.) The
archaeology of social boundaries. Washington, DC and London: Smithsonian
Institution Press, 232 – 269.
Gosselain, O. 1992: Technology and style: potters and pottery among Bafia of Cameroon,
Man 27, 559 – 586.
Gosselain, O. 1998: Social a technical identity in clay crystal ball. In: The archaeology of
social boundaries, M. T. Stark (ed.), Washington, DC and London: Smithsonian
Institution Press. 78-106.
Hosler, D. 1996: Technical choices, social categories and meaning among the Andean potters
of Las Animas. Journal of Material Culture 1, 63 – 92.
Krause, R. A. 1985: The clay sleeps: an ethnoarchaeological study of three African potters.
Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Lemonnier, P. 1992: Elements for anthropology of technology. Anthropological Papers of the
Museum of Anthropology 88. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
O'Connell, J. F. 1974: Spoon, knives and scrapers: the function of yilugwa in central
Australia, Mankind 9, 189-194
Pétrequin P. – Pétrequin, A.- M. 1990: Fléches de chasse, fléches de guerre: le cas des Danis
d’Irian Jaya (Indonésie). Bulletin de la Société des Océanistes 91 (2), 95-113.
Schiffer, M. – Skibo, J. 1997: The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity 62,
27 – 50.
Thompson, R. H. 1958: Modern Yucatecan Maya Pottery Making. Memoirs of the Society for
American Archaeology 15. American Antiquity 23/4, část 2.
White, J. P. 1967: Ethno-archaeology in New Guinea: two examples. Mankind 6, 409-414.
White, J. P. 1968: Ston naip bilong tumbuna: the living stone age in New Guinea. IN: La
préhistoire: problémes et tendances. Paris:CNRS, 511-516.
Experimentální archeologie a funkce
Aronson, M. – Skibo, J. M. – Stark, M. T. 1994: Production and use technologies in Kalinga
pottery. IN: Longacre, W. A. – Skibo, J. M. (eds.): Kalinga ethnoarchaeology:
expanding archaeological method and theory. Washington, DC: Smithsonian
Institution Press, 83-111.
Gosselain, O. P. 1992: Bonfire of the enquiries. Pottery firing temperatures in archaeology:
what for? Journal of Archaeological Science 19, 243-259.
Kobayashi, M. 1994: Use-alteration analysis of Kalinga pottery: interior carbon deposits of
cooking pots. IN: Longacre, W. A. – Skibo, J. M. (eds.): Kalinga ethnoarchaeology:
expanding archaeological method and theory. Washington, DC: Smithsonian
Institution Press, 127-68.
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Nicklin, K. 1981: Pottery production and distribution in southeast Nigeria. IN: Howard, H. –
Morris, E. (eds.): Production and distribution: a ceramic viewpoint. BAR
International Series 120, Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 169-186.
Picon, M. 1992: Ethnoarchéologie et recherches en laboratoire: le cas des techniques
céramiques. IN: Audouze, F. (ed.): Ethnoarchéologie: justification, problémes,
limites. Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes 12. Juanles-Pins: Editions APDCA.
Skibo, J. 1992: Pottery funkcion: a use-alteration perspective. New York: Plenum.
Taxonomie
Kempton, W. 1981: The folk classification of ceramics: a study of cognitive prototypes. New
York: Academic Press.
Miller, D. 1985: Artefacts as categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Styl
Conkey, M. W. – Hastorf, Ch. A. (eds.) 1990: The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Ian Hodder, I. 1977: Distribution of material culture items in the Baringo district, western
Kenya. Man 12, 239-269.
Sackett, J. 1977: The meaning of style in archaeology: a general model. American Antiquity
42, 369-380.).
Pavlů, I. 2000: Life on a neolithic site. Archeologický ústav, Praha.
Polly Wiessner (1983: Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points.
American Antiquity 48, 253-276.).
Martin Wobst (1977: Stylistic behaviour and information exchange. In: Papers for the
Director: research esays in honor of James B. Griffin, C. Cleland (ed.), pp.317-342.
Michigan Anthropological Papers 61. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology,
University of Michigan.).
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Předávaní znalostí a zkušeností, specializovaná výroba.
Bellamy, C. B. 1904: A West African smelting house, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute
64-65, 99-126.
Brown, J. 1995: Traditional metalworking in Kenya. Cambridge Monographs in African
Archaeology 38. Oxford: Oxbow Books (Oxbow Monograph 44).
Costin, C. L. 1991: Craft specialization: issues in definig, codumenting, and explaining the
organization of production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3, 1-56.
David, N. – Kramer, C. 2001: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge – kapitola 11
David, N. – Heimann, R. – Killick, D. J. – Wayman, M. 1989: Between bloomery and blast
furnace: Mafa iron-smelting technology in Northern Cameroon, African
Archaeological Review 7, 183-208.
David, N. – Robertson, I. G. 1996: Competition and change in two traditional African iron
industries. IN: Schmidt, P. R. (ed.): The culture and technology of African iron
production, Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 128 - 144.
de Maret, P. 1985: The smith’s myth and the origin of leadership in Central Africa. IN:
Haaland, R. – Shinnie, P. L. (eds.): African iron working. Oslo: Norwegian
University Press, 142 – 163.
Dietler, M. – Herbich, I. 1994: Ceramics and ethnic identity: ethnoarchaeological
observations on the distribution of pottery styles and the relationship between the
social contexts of production and consumption. IN: Terre cuite et société: la
céramique, document technique, économique, culturel, Rencontres Internationales
d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes 14. Juan-les-pins: Editions APDCA, 232-269.
Eliade, M. 2000: Kováři a alchymisté. Praha: Argo (1977: Forgerons et alchimistes.
Paris: Flammarion).
Hayden, B. – Cannon, A. 1984: The structure of material system: athnoarchaeology in the
Myay highlands. SAA Papers 3. Washington, DC: Society for American
Archaeology.
Hodder, I. 1982: Symbols in action: ethnoaerchaeological studies of material culture. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Horne, L. 1994: Itinerant brasscasters of eastern India. IN: Allchin, B. (ed.): Living traditions:
studies in the ethnoarchaeology of South Asia, New Delhi: Oxford and IBH
Publishing Co.Pvt.Ltd., 265-280.
Childs, S. T. – Dewey, W. J. 1996: Forging symbolic meaning in Zaire and Zimbabwe. IN:
Schmidt, P. R. (ed.): The culture and technology of African iron production.
Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 145 – 171.
Kusimba, C. M. 1996: Social context of iron forging on the Kenya coast, Africa 66, 386 –
410.
Larick, R. 1991: Warriors and blacksmiths: mediating ethnicity in East African spears,
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10, 299 – 331.
Peacock, D. P. S. 1982: Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach.
London: Longman.
Roux, V. 1989: The potter’s wheel: craft specialization and technical competence. New Delhi:
Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Van der Leeuw, S. 1977: Towards a study of the economics of pottery making. IN: van Beek,
B. L. – Brandt, R. W. – Gruenman van Watteringe, W.(eds.): Ex horreo, Cingula 4.
Amsterdam: A. E. van Giffen Instituut voor Praeen Protohistoire, University of
Amsterdam, 68-76.
Van der Merwe, N. – Avery, D. 1987: Science and magic in African technology: traditional
iron smelting in Malawi, Africa 57, 143 – 172.
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Osídlení regionu: vzory a systémy
Binford, L. R. 1980: Willow smoke and dogs´ tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and
archaeological site formation, American Antiquity 45, 4-20.
Flannery, Kent V. (ed.) 1976: The Early Mesoamerican village. New York, London:
Academic Press.
Hole, F. 1978: Pastoral nomadism in western Iran. IN: Gould, R. A. (ed): Explorations in
ethnoarchaeology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 127-167.
Christaller, W. 1933: Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Karl Zeiss: Jena.
David, N. – Kramer, C. 2001: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge – kapitoly 8, 9, 10.
Graham, M. 1993: Settlement organization and resident variability among the Rarámuri, IN:
Cameron, C. – Tomka, S. (eds.): Abandonment settlement and regions. Cambridge
University Press, 25-42.
Johnson, G. A. 1972: A test of the utility of Central Place Theory in Archaeology. IN: Ucko,
P. J. – Tringham, R. – Dimbleby, G. W. (ed.) 1972: Man, settlement and urbanism.
London: Duckworth, 769-785.
Kent, S.(ed.)1987: Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological
Approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
Oswald, D. B. 1987: The Organization of Space in Residential Buildings: A Cross-Cultural
Perspective. IN: Kent, S.(ed.): Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An
Ethnoarchaeological Approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pospíšil, L. 1997: Etnologie práva, Praha (The Ethnology of Law, 1985).
Renfrew, C. – Bahn, P. 1991: Archaeology. Theories, Method and Practice. London:
Thames and Hudson Ltd. – kapitola 5.
Stone, G. D. 1992: Social distance, spatial relations, and agricultural production among the
Kofyar of Namu District, Plateau State, Nigeria. Journal of Anthropological
Archaeology 11, 152 – 172.
Yellen, J. 1977: Archaeological approaches to the present. New York: Academic Press.
Osídlení lokality
Binford, L. R. 1978: Dimensional analysis of behavior and site structure: learning from an
Eskimo hunting stand, American Antiquity 43, 330-361.
Kramer, C. 1982: Village ethnoarchaeology: rural Iran in archaeological perspective. New
York: Academic Press.
O’Connell, J. 1987: Alyawara site structure and its archaeological implications, American
antiquity 52, 74-108.
O’Connell, J. F. – Hawkes, K. – Blurton Jones, N. G. 1991: Distribution of refuse producing
activities at Hadza residence base camps: implications for analyses of archaeological
site. IN: Kroll, E. M. – Price, D. T. (eds.): The interpretation of archaeological
spatial patterning. New York: Plennum Press, 61 – 76.
Oswald, D. B. 1987: The Organization of Space in Residential Buildings: A Cross-Cultural
Perspective. IN: Kent, S.(ed.): Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An
Ethnoarchaeological Approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
Smith, S. 1980: The environmental adaptation of nomads in the west African Sahel: key to
understanding prehistoric pastoralists. IN: Williams, M. A. – Faure, H. (eds.): The
Sahara and the Nile: Quarternary environments and prehistoric occupation in
northern Africa. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Obchod a směna
Bouzek, J. – Ondřejová, I. 1990: „Třetí zóna“ mezi Římem a barbarikem, Archeologické
rozhledy 42/1, 22-35.
Dalton, G. 1977: Aboriginal Economies in Stateless Societies. IN: Earle, T. K. – Ericson, J. E.
(eds.): Exchange Systems in Prehistory. Academic Press: New York a London, 191
– 212.
David, N. – Kramer, C. 2001: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge – kapitola 12.
Frankenstein, S. – Rowlands, M. 1978: The internal structure and regional context of Early
Iron Age society in southwestern Germany. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology
15, 73-112.
Hodges, R. J. 1982: Dark Age Economics. The origins of town and trade AD 600 – 1000.
Duckworth: London.
Larick, R. 1987: Men of iron and social boundariesin northern Kenya. IN: Auger, R. – Glass,
M. – MacEachern, A. S. – McCartney P. (eds.): Etnicity and culture. Proceedings of
the Eighteenth Annual Chacmool Conference. Calgary: University of Calgary
Archaeological Association, 67-75.
Lemonnier, P. 1992: Elements for an anthropology of technology. Anthropological Papers of
the Museum of Anthropology 88. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 44-49.
Longacre, W. – Skibo, J. (eds.) 1994: Kalinga ethnoarchaeology: expanding archaeological
method and theory. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Malinowski, B. 1922: Argonauts of the western Pacific. New York: Dutton.
Mauss, M. 1925 (1. vydání 1924): The Gift. Routledge: London.
McBryde, I. 1984: Kulin greenstone quarries: the social contexts of production and
distribution for the Mount William site, World Archaeology 16, 267-285.
Pétrequin, P. – Pétrequin, A. M. 1990: Haches de Yeleme, herminettes de Mumyeme, Journal
de la Société des Océanistes 91 (2), 95-113.
Pires-Ferreira, J. W. 1976: Obsidian Exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. IN: Flannery, K.:
The Early Mesoamerican village. New York, London: Academic Press. 292-306.
Polanyi, K. 1957: The economy as instituted process. IN: Polanyi, K. – Arensberg, M. –
Pearson, H. (eds.): Trade and Market in the Early Empires. Free Press: Glencoe,
Illiois.
Polanyi, K.1963: Ports of Trade in Early Societies. Journal of Economic History 23, 30-45.
Renfrew, C. – Bahn, P. 1991: Archaeology. Theories, Methods and Practice. London:
Thames and Hudson – kapitola 9: What contact did they have? Trade and
exchange.
Sahlins, M. 1972: Stone Age Economics. Aldine: Chicago.
Wallerstein, I. 1974 & 1980: The Modern World System. 2 svazky. Academic Press: New
York a London.
Úvod do etnoarcheologie, letní semestr 2006
Sociální organizace
Boserup, E. 1965: The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. Aldine: Chicago.
Diakonoff, I. M. 1969: The rise of the despotic state in Ancient Mesopotamia. IN: Diakonoff,
I. M. (ed.): Ancient Mesopotamia: socio-economic history. Moskva.
Freidel, D. 1981: Civilization as a state of mind: the cultural evolution of the Lowland Maya.
IN: Jones, G. D. – Kautz, R. R. (eds.): The Transition to Statehood in the New
World, Cambridge University Press, 188-227.
Johnson, G. A. 1982: Organizational Structure and Scalar Stress. IN: Renfrew, C. –
Rowlands, M. J. – Segraves, B.A. (eds.): Theory and Explanation in Archaeology.
Academic Press: New York & London.
Kuper, H. 1963: The Swazi: a South African Kingdom. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New
York.
Malinowski, B. 1968: Vědecká teorie kultury. Krajské kulturní středisko. Brno. (1944, A
scientific theory of culture).
Malthus, T. 1798: An Essay on the Principle of Population. London, printed for J. Johnson, in
St, Paul′s church-yard.
Orme, B. 1981: Anthropology for Archaeologists. Gerald Duckworth: London. –
kapitola 3. Social organisation.
Prorok, V. – Lisa, A. 2003: Politologie. Vysokoškolská učebnice. Vydavatelství a
nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk. Dobrá Voda u Pelhřimova.
Rathje, W. L. 1971: The Origin and Development of Lowland Classic Maya Civilization.
American Antiquity 36, 275 – 285.
Renfrew, C. 1972: The Emergence of Civilization. The Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third
Millennium B.C. Methuen: London.
Renfrew, C. – Bahn, P. 1991: Archaeology. Theories, Methods and Practice. London:
Thames and Hudson. – kapitola 5: How were societies organized? Social
archaeology, kapitola 12: What did think change? Explanation in archaeology.
Sanders, W. T. – Marino, J. 1970: New World Prehistory. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
Service, E. 1971: Primitive Social Organization. An Evolutionary Perspective (2. vydání).
Random House: New York.
Turnbull, C. 1961: The Forest People. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Wittfogel, K. 1957: Oriental Despotism, a Comparative Study of Total Power. Yale
University Press: New Haven.

Podobné dokumenty

pdf file

pdf file lukautim dispela trupela samting bilong kantri.

Více

Analýza nekeramického odpadu neolitického sídliště v

Analýza nekeramického odpadu neolitického sídliště v organizace odpadu mají průmyslová města, což souvisí s potřebou udržet komfortní dlouhodobou existenci na malém vymezeném prostoru (sekundární odpad). Opět platí, že srovnávat lze ekonomicky i soci...

Více

Osady kultury s lineární keramikou ve východních

Osady kultury s lineární keramikou ve východních Filozofická fakulta Ústav pro pravěk a ranou dobu dějinnou Historické vědy

Více

Puakulaba a Julie

Puakulaba a Julie [C] Svìt za hranicemi a noc Svìt mimo za hranicemi usedlostí byl obydlený mnoha duchy a démony, jichž se bylo tøeba obávat. I když termín „duch“ vlastnì není tak úplnì výstižný a narážíme pøi nìm n...

Více

PDF článku ke stažení… - Data a výzkum

PDF článku ke stažení… - Data a výzkum ** Veškerou korespondenci zasílejte na adresu: Prof. PhDr. Hynek Jeřábek, CSc., Institut sociologických studií, Fakulta sociálních věd UK, U Kříže 8, 158 00 Praha 5, e-mail:

Více

Archeologie smyšlené identity

Archeologie smyšlené identity Vlastnosti artefaktů odkazují nejenom k jejich funkci či chronologické pozici, ale mají také předpokládaný potenciál vymezovat identitu svých nositelů. Právě na základě této hypotézy jsou archeolog...

Více

Diplomová práce - UNHCR Central Europe

Diplomová práce - UNHCR Central Europe dokumentem z oblasti uprchlického práva, ve kterém je upraveno „rasové pronásledování“, a to Ženevskou úmluvou o právním postavení uprchlíků z roku 1950. Poprvé je zde tedy zmiňován termín „rasa ja...

Více