Statement of Qualifications Mining Water Balance
Transkript
Statement of Qualifications Mining Water Balance
Statement of Qualifications Mining Water Balance Modeling ater supply, distribution and management are critical to the operation of all mines. Water monitoring and tracking assists in water use optimization. Water (balance) modeling is a valuable tool for documenting the operation of mine water systems and for tracking water supplies, use, and consumption. Once developed, water models can be used to evaluate water related advantages/disadvantages associated with proposed operational changes, expansions, permitting, and mine closure studies. HydroGeoLogica specializes in mine water models for: Water Pre‐feasibility Feasibility Operations Expansion studies Facility (tailings impoundments, leach pad) studies Site‐wide water management Pit lake modeling (see associated SOQ) Permitting Closure model construction involves the development of a RDA Pond Drain-down (1st year of closure) Mine Closure Water Balance Conceptual Model Precip. RDA Runoff Evap. Catchment Runoff Tailings Runoff (< 2 yrs of closure) Collected Seepage (<10 yrs of closure) CN Destruct Treatment Plant conceptual model of operational Seepage RDA Runoff (>2 yrs after closure) Collected Seepage (>10 yrs after closure) RDA R4 Pond Drain-down (1st year of closure) conditions. Operational changes Catchment Runoff Catchment Runoff are continual during the active Precip. Precip. Evap. RDA Runoff Evap. Catchment Runoff Tailings Reservoir Reservoir pond (drained during first 6 months of closure) and throughflow Evap. (Breached at closure) Seepage RDA Runoff and Collected Seepage WRD Runoff Diversion Pond phase of mine life. It is therefore Precip. Precip. Evap. WRD A important to maintain Outflow CN Destruct discharge Seepage to North Pit From IWS operational water balance models Precip. Evap. Precip. NP overflow At 230m RL Catchment Runoff Evap. Catchment Runoff Pit Wall Runoff WRD Runoff North Pit WRD Runoff to North Pit WRD B Seepage Groundwater Inflow South Pit Groundwater Outflow Groundwater Inflow Seepage to IWS WRD Runoff to South Pit Precip. Evap. Groundwater Outflow WRD Runoff to South Pit -456m RL WRD Runoff WRD C Precip. Intermediate Water Storage Pit Wall Runoff -252m RL Seepage to groundwater IWS discharge to ARD Treatment Plant (<20 yrs after closure) IWS discharge (>20 yrs after closure) SP overflow At 235m RL Drainage Channel Precip.Evap. ARD Treatment Plant regularly so that they represent current conditions Catchment Runoff WRD Runoff Seepage to IWS Stockpile Footprint Runoff Evap. Seepage to groundwater Medium Grade Seepage to IWS Stockpile Footprint Discharge HGL SOQ 2012 ‐ Mine Water Balance Modeling Page 2 The conceptual model is used to develop a numerical model in GoldSim. Leach Pad Supporting Data 3.14 16 3.14 16 3.14 16 Total_Pad_Area Leach_Pads_Catchment_Area Active_Leaching_Area 3.14 16 Outflows Inflows 3.14 16 Irrigation_Rate X X X X Active_Leach_Evaporation Dry_fraction_Evap X X Leach_Pad_Precip Cross check. Should be about 10% Wet_fraction_of_Active_IrrArea Wetting Leach_Pad X X PLS_out_of_Pad Leach_Pad_Inflows Leach_Pad_Outflows HydroGeoLogica, Inc. 414 Garden Glen Ct., Golden, CO 80403 www.hydrogeologica.com HGL SOQ 2012 ‐ Mine Water Balance Modeling Page 3 ‘Dashboard’ controls can be built into GoldSim water models and customized to allow users to evaluate ‘what if?’ scenarios. Measured and calculated flow rates from the water model can be displayed on a flow diagram in Excel for ease of use. Water Model ‐ Diagram of Average Flows Period for Averaging FROM 10/1/2012 TO 10/31/2012 GROUNDWATER SUPPLIES SURFACEWATER SUPPLIES 10 gpm Groundwater Supply 3000 gpm 1000 gpm Pump Station 40 gpm 50 gpm Water Tank Losses 800 gpm Evaporative Losses Fill Stand Miscellaneous consumptive uses 1000 gpm Booster 250 gpm 100 gpm Treatment Plant Crusher 390 gpm 1800 gpm MILL 200 gpm Dust Supression Conveyor Mill Pond 75 gpm SX-EW / LEACHING 60 gpm 800 gpm Distribution Tank Mill Floatation Circuit Overflow 100 gpm 500 gpm (Reclaim) Losses Processing Losses Losses in Concentrate Concentrate (shipped) 50 gpm Dust Supression EW Well Tailings Thickener Bypass flow 40 gpm 8000 gpm 950 gpm 6000 gpm TAILINGS Seldom used Bypass (as needed) Aggregate Raffinate Pond Local Wells Storage Pond 1000 gpm 7950 gpm PLS 8000 gpm Aggregate PLS Pond 50 gpm 9500 gpm Pit Dewatering Aggregate Leach Pad Soak Up Reclaim Tank Reclaim 500 gpm Wetting and Irrigation OverFlow Tailings Fill Stand SX Mill Grinding Cooling and Dust Suppression Losses 40 gpm 550 gpm 1100 gpm Seepage Return Pond Wells Tailings Reclaim Pond 1 Upset conditions only Tailings 20 gpm Seepage Collection Wells Well Collection system Seepage Return Pond Tailings Reclaim Pond 3 6200 gpm 550 gpm Tailings Reclaim Pond 2 Dust Supression 100 gpm Uncollected Seepage HydroGeoLogica, Inc. 414 Garden Glen Ct., Golden, CO 80403 www.hydrogeologica.com 5000 gpm HGL SOQ 2012 ‐ Mine Water Balance Modeling Summaries of Selected Projects: Page 4 Zonia Mine, Arizona – Redstone Resources Corporation Facility specific water balances were developed in GoldSim to evaluate operational conditions associated with a proposed pit and proposed heap leach pad. These water balances were then used as the foundation for closure water balances of these facilities. Standardized Water (Balance) Modeling for Multiple Mine Sites ‐ Freeport‐McMorRan Copper and Gold Standardized water (balance) modeling techniques were developed and documented. Freeport McMoRan was then able to direct a number of consulting companies to develop water models using these guidelines so that the models would be of a similar format, and would be customized to meet the needs of the parent company. This standardized approach to mine water modeling allows easy comparison of water use data between mine sites, and is helpful for larger, multi‐site and international mining companies. Bagdad and Safford Mines, Arizona ‐ Freeport‐ McMorRan Copper and Gold Development and maintenance of stochastic dynamic systems models representing operational mine water management using GoldSim. The models are used to evaluate climate related water supply issues and mine water management and facility development alternatives. Training of site staff for operation and maintenance of the models was also provided. Martabe Mine feasibility study, Indonesia ‐ Oxiana A stochastic dynamic systems model of site‐wide mine water management was developed in GoldSim for a gold mine feasibility study. The model includes a synthetic precipitation generator, power and equipment failure frequencies, and 14 site facilities including two fresh water dams, four containment dams, two ore stockpiles, an ore processing facility, a pit, and a water treatment plant. The proposed mine is located in the headwaters of a river which is heavily used downstream as a water supply. The site design was developed in order that the mine would be compliant with the U.S. Cyanide Code, so the output was used to demonstrate the likelihood, frequency and magnitude of any possible releases of untreated water from the site. The model was used to evaluate mine water management alternatives and to predict water storage in various facilities. Calculated inflows and outflows from the various facilities were used as input parameters to hydrochemical modeling (in Phreeq) based on the quality of each influent water type. Supporting chemical mass balance calculations were successfully performed within GoldSim for certain parameters. Changes in water quality at the various water storage facilities throughout the mine life were predicted. Tenke Mine, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) ‐ Freeport‐McMorRan Copper and Gold Conceptual model development and dynamic systems modeling was performed in support of water use accounting and optimization for the mine tailings operations. The model was designed to be used for deterministic or stochastic predictions of water demand based on climate scenarios. A ‘player’ version of the model was provided to allow mine staff to operate the model (to evaluate user‐defined scenarios and view results without direct knowledge of GoldSim). Goldsim and site‐specific‐model training were also provided, together with documentation and ongoing model support. Mt. Todd Project, Northern Territory (NT), Australia ‐ Vista Gold Australia Conceptual model development and dynamic systems modeling was performed in support of evaluating the water balance for the proposed mine expansion and redevelopment project, in support of pre‐feasibility analysis. The life of mine model included all aspects of mine water usage from pre‐ development through the operational period; the model included pit dewatering, tailings facility water balance, heap leach facility and ponds, waste HydroGeoLogica, Inc. 414 Garden Glen Ct., Golden, CO 80403 www.hydrogeologica.com HGL SOQ 2012 ‐ Mine Water Balance Modeling rock piles, and several stormwater ponds. A separate model was developed to evaluate closure scenarios, including water treatment, and develop the most practical and efficient closure plan; the closure model was evaluated using a stochastic climate generator to evaluate the effects of long‐ term climate variation. Haile Mine Pre‐Feasibility Study, South Carolina ‐ Romarco A stochastic dynamic systems model was developed using GoldSim to evaluate water management alternatives for a proposed multi‐pit gold mine. The model includes several pits, water transfer facilities, water storage facilities and other mine facilities together with intermittent power and equipment failures. Power failures were correlated to extreme weather events. The model was used to verify availability of water on site to operate the mill, to estimate required water treatment rates, and to ensure that the mine design was compliant with U.S. Cyanide Code. Waters of different qualities were tracked across the site so they could be managed separately. Intermittent power and equipment failures were simulated and were correlated to extreme weather events. Johnson Camp, copper mine, Arizona – Nord Resources Corporation A dynamic systems model was developed in GoldSim to simulate flows within several leach circuits at the mine. 16 site facilities are simulated. The model is designed to allow users to evaluate leach pad loading alternatives and irrigation plans, and optimize solution management during operations. Input data are stored in spreadsheets and results are exported to spreadsheets to allow mine staff to operate the model and view results without direct knowledge of GoldSim. Marlin Mine, gold mine, Guatemala ‐ Goldcorp A dynamic systems model of mine water and tailings management was developed in GoldSim to predict water and tailings storage needs for changing ore production rates. The model was calibrated to Page 5 existing site data and then used for predictive purposes. On‐site GoldSim training for mine personnel was provided so that the model calibration could be updated and water management procedures within the model modified as necessary. Gaby Mine feasibility study, Ecuador ‐ Codelco The project consisted of development of a dynamic systems model using GoldSim to evaluate potential mine designs. Model predicted operational and closure issues for various mine design alternatives to ensure the mine operated as a zero discharge facility. Water storage and treatment requirements were optimized. Kori Chaca Mine, Bolivia ‐ Inti Raymi (controlled by Newmont) A stochastic dynamic systems model (water balance) was developed using GoldSim to evaluate pit filling options for mine closure including timing and water quality issues. The possibility of encapsulating mine waste in highly saline water at the bottom of the pit was evaluated. The water balance included mass‐balance water quality calculations to evaluate the likely salinity of the pit lake and the stability of pit lake stratification and continued waste encapsulation into the future. Boddington Gold Mine, Australia ‐ Newmont A stochastic dynamic systems model (water balance) was developed using GoldSim to evaluate options for mine water disposal and management at closure. The mine includes two pits, two tailings storage facilitie, a number of waste rock storage facilities and several water storage dams. Operational changes throughout the closure period, such as the installation of cover systems on closed facilities (TSFs and waste dumps), operation and closure of treatment plants, decommissioning of dams etc are simulated in the model. Mass balance chemistry was also developed within the GoldSim model to calculate and track changes in the concentrations of chloride and sulfate at various locations in the system. HydroGeoLogica, Inc. 414 Garden Glen Ct., Golden, CO 80403 www.hydrogeologica.com