30 years IGL
Transkript
30 years IGL
DER MAKROPODE ISSN 0937-177X 31. Jahrgang – April 2009 Zeitschrift der IGL Internationale Gemeinschaft für Labyrinthfische – 30 years IGL – 2/09 Jubilee edition – 30 years IGL – Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 37 Nandus nandus – female (Photo: A. Kandler) Sandelia capensis-pair, on the left the male, on the right the female. The genders can easily be observed by the differences in head shapes. (Photo: H. Hensel/J. Schmidt, Weißwasser) 38 Channa melasoma-pair Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 (Foto: C. Kanele) Contents Auke de Jong (NL) Editorial 40 Thomas Seehaus (D) Macropodus in garden ponds 41 M. Hallmann & M. Scharfenberg Species differentiation of the stocky, bubble nest building fighting fish (Betta splendens-Group) 47 Karl-Heinz Roßmann Simple identification key for stocky, bubble nest building Betta – wild forms (only males in magnificent coloration to be deter- mined), without breeding forms and hybrids. 53 Karl-Heinz Roßmann (D) fishes? Gouramis of the genus Trichogaster – the new problematic 54 Peter Finke (D) Licorice gourami in tanks: Basic facts and recommendations Anke Binzenhöfer (D) Sphaerichthys vaillanti – the red chocolate gourami Jürgen Schmidt Observations regarding sexual characteristics of dwarf ctenopoma, bush fish and cape kurper Christian Kanele (CH) Channa melasoma – breeding, exotics and the IGL Karl-Heinz Roßmann (D) They are called Badis badis – the “blue“fish of the genus of Badis 77 and Dario 83 Nandus nandus (Hamilton, 1822) 87 Polypterus senegalus Cuvier, 1829 – the bichir from Senegal 93 The literature team 94 The taxonomic research of the labyrinth fishes from 1758–2008 97 59 63 Rudolf Rucks (D) Hugues Van Besien (F) Bruno Urbanski (D) Ingo Schindler (D) Cover picture: 66 72 Betta imbellis, Pontian, West-Malaysia (Foto: M. Hallmann) Macropodus opercularis – der Paradiesfisch (Foto: T. Seehaus) Dario dario (Foto: G. Ott) Sphaerichthys vaillanti (Foto: F. Schäfer) Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 39 Dear members of the IGL, After the publication of our journal 3/4 as special edition in 1994, we now have a second anniversary issue of our magazine “Der Makropode” available. The reason for the first issue was the 15th anniversary of the IGL and it was the first issue of “Der Makropode” with a colour cover. Today, on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the IGL, we can proudly present the second special edition. This issue is double the size of a normal one and contains only colour photos. Especially for this issue, the many different articles were written by the members of the IGL. So they reflect the whole diversity of the thematic work within the IGL. The fact alone that so many members agreed to write an article for this special edition shows us the potential inside the IGL. In my opinion, this is used far too little and it will be a challenge for the future steering committee to use these potentials slumbering within the IGL in an even better way. However we should always bear in mind that it is a voluntary work and that it remains as such as Peter Finke wrote. One should really assume that a community dealing with labyrinth fishes represents a strongly specialized organization so that further specializations hardly seem to be possible. But that’s not the way it is. The teams working within the IGL concentrate on particular species which require special methods of keeping and breeding. Let’s think of the keepers and breeders of Editorial the several species of Channa. Nobody would come up with the idea of co-housing snakeheads and licorice gouramis, to quote only one example. So there are 12 different teams working within the IGL and of all these teams you can read articles in this issue. At this point I would like to thank all authors making it possible to publicize such a special edition. That’s the way voluntary work is fun. The last two and a half years of my term as chairman showed me anyhow that voluntary work can cause a lot of pleasure as a matter of fact. Particularly when you are successful you wish this would be our profession. The IGL has changed during the last years and it could prove that it is really a modern working international association. The non profit making and cosmopolitan nature shape our image more and more. At the moment the internationality is especially reflected by the two teams Parosphromenus and Channa. As already announced the Channa team and the Snakeheads UK (Great Britain) are organizing a Channa meeting in Meppel, Netherlands. Participants from England, Scotland, Belgium, France, the Neth- 40 erlands, Switzerland, Sweden and Germany will attend this meeting. The English language as the lingua franca of our team enables the exchange of experiences and a Study Group Channidae was found which enjoys great popularity. Interested parties of one of the most important channa habitat in India applied for their participation. A program is the basis for the work of all teams: “What is the purpose of maintaining our tank stocks?” How can we contribute to the protection of the environment and what can we do to protect the natural habitats of our fishes are going to be exterminated at an incredible speed? And how can we multiply the species in order to sustain stable populations in the long run? Should we possibly even try to simulate a kind of natural (artificial selection? 200 years after the birth of Charles Darwinthese are the questions which we should concentrate on. Finally here is important information in the matter of planning the conference in spring 2010. In the last issue of our journal “Der Makropode” 4/08 you could read that the conference should take place from May 23rd – 25th, 2010. This date is not correct!!! The correct date is April 23rd – 25th, 2010! However Altena as the place of the conference is right. I wish you a lot of fun when you read this journal! Yours chairman, Auke de Jong Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Team Macropodus Macropodus in garden ponds By Thomas Seehaus More that 130 years ago the paradise fishes (Macropodus opercularis Linnaeus, 1758) were imported from Ningbo in China to Europe for the first time. On the one hand they were very robust but on the other hand also nicely coloured and furthermore they showed an interesting behaviour. Therefore it is no wonder that they became the pioneers of the warm-water-aquarists in Europe. The fact that these fishes are so robust is – without any doubt – due to the enormous distribution area. From the south of Vietnam to the river Amur in the north of China they inhabit an area covering tropical, subtropical as well as temperate climatic zones. The fishes have to cope with hard winters and frosted waters in their northern distribution area. Therefore the different kinds of macropodus are excellently suited for the outdoors, whether in the garden pond of in a tank on the balcony or in an outdoor tank. Before going into the outdoor keeping more precisely I would like to shortly present the distribution area of the currently known species and variants. south of China to the river Amur in the moderately cool north of China as well as in Korea and on some Japanese islands. The requirements on the keeping of tanks are very different when fishes live in such varying climatic zones. Whilst paradise fishes from the south of China are only rarely confronted with temperatures below 10 degrees C, the most northern stocks have to get by with severe frost up to minus 20 degrees of air temperature. They can only survive these temperatures in waters being deep enough so that a frostfree water zone can be formed. In summer there are only rarely temperatures of more than 20 degrees in the north whereas 30 degrees and more can be reached in the south. Fishes from Korea can permanently be kept outdoors without any problem as long as the water does not freeze completely. Fishes from regions further to the south are more sensitive and have to over winter in cold (~ 10 degrees) but frost-free waters. Unfortunately we usually don’t know where the fishes which occasionally turn up on the market come from. The exporters fro the Far East only rarely quote the exact places where the fishes were found, and if so it is a matter of luck if the retailer really knows the actual locations. Therefore you should carefully deal with fishes of uncertain origin and you The round tail paradise fish – Macropodus ocellatus Cantor, 1842 Paradise fishes inhabit the most northern parts of the distribution area of all macropodus. You also find them from the subtropical Macropodus ocellatus - male Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 (Photo: H.-J. Richter) 41 Spawning couple, typically the light female (Photo: A. Hartl) male in case of danger. The fishes also cope with the attendance of snails. Nevertheless the keeper should take care that they do not spread out of control in case he wants to breed the fishes successfully. Once the larvae swim free there isn’t any danger by the adult fishes. However the larvae of damselflies can take a considerable toll from the swarm of the young fishes. Normally there are however enough larvae which grow up during the summer in order to save the stock especially since the grown-up macropodus greedily polish off smaller insect larvae. The paradise fish – Macropodus opercularis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) M. opercularis should not over winter them outdoors. Fishes imported from Hangzhou (China) in the 80s could repeatedly over winter under ice. The stock from the middle Yangtze area shows comparable climatic needs. Since several years paradise fishes from Korea have continuously been kept in garden ponds where they willingly multiply, too. Paradise fishes are very peaceful labyrinth fishes showing only little aggression against each other. However they are often very shy so that you cannot see much of them when there are too few floating leaves which protect them from being seen from above. Floating leaves also prevent that the water is too strongly heated by direct solar radiation. In the 90 litres mortar tubs which I use, you can absolutely keep two males together with two to four females. As soon as the water temperatures reach 15 degrees the males start to to put on their magnificent summer dress. But between themselves they remain peaceful. Females ready for spawning begin to change color, too. However they show a bright creamy spawning colour. The males become very territorial after spawning, because they now have to protect the bubble nest with their eggs or larvae. Often the nest only consists of one cluster of spawn which, if necessary, can be moved by the 42 Considerably further south is the distribution area of the paradise fish. The most north borderline is approximately in the latitude of the city of Nan king (Nanjing) at the Jangtsekiang (Chiang Jiang). There the average temperatures vary between 0 degree in December/January and 27 degrees in July which is comparable to regions in Germany with moderate climate. The most southern distribution area that is known is situated in the highlands of Dalat in South Vietnam where there is a moderate climate, too. As paradise fishes are very adaptable it might be possible that wild populations exist still further in the south. If these South Vietnamese populations are quite naturally there or if they are wild or exposed tank fishes, is only very difficultly or even not to be proved nowadays. Today you even find paradise fishes at places where it is for sure that they do not live there naturally, for example in Florida or in Madagascar. As already mentioned in the introduction, the first paradise fishes were imported to Europe from the city of Ningbo near Shanghai. Nan king in its turn is only 100km away from Ningbo. Therefore the paradise fishes from Nan Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 king should correspond to a large extent to the first macropodus kept in tanks. It was probably a fortunate coincidence that these fishes were imported even from there and therefore they could very well cope with the conditions in the first European tanks. Fishes from the Nan king stock are excellently suitable for being kept in ponds. In regions with relatively milder winter seasons it is even possible to over winter under ice, as long as the period of frost spans only a few days or weeks. I over wintered these fishes together with round tail paradise fishes at water temperatures below 10 degrees. They can stay outdoors from March until late autumn. Macropodus from North Vietnam can be kept in the garden until autumn, too, because the climate there absolutely knows cool temperatures which however rarely fall below 15 degrees. The middle and South Vietnamese stocks are clearly more thermophillic. You should not expect them to tolerate cold snaps with air temperatures below 15 degrees. I keep these stocks in mortar tubs on the balcony only from May to the end of September where you can easily observe the mating. It is interesting to see that the females of all wild forms of paradise fishes which I know, show a similar change of colour as the females of the round tail macropodus. The last mentioned stocks are not suitable for the garden pond; because they need to be fished out in autumn and so you always have to expect losses. However for keeping in tubs which can easily be surveyed or outdoor tanks they are absolutely to be recommended. The Hong Kong paradise fish – Macropodus hongkongensis Herder & Freyhof, 2002 A few years ago the Hong Kong paradise fish was found in a Macropodus hongkongensis quite small area in the environs of Hong Kong. In the meantime the species has also been detected at other places in Guangdong (Canton) in south China. This species of macropodus was considered as a variant of the black macropodus at first. But in the meantime it has turned out that the fishes are much closer to the paradise fish. Since further imports of this species to Europe are not to be expected, we should intensively try to preserve it by breeding. If this species will permanently survive in our tanks we will see. It is said to be very aggressive and less attractive. The latter I don’t want to leave as it is. Even though they do not show loud colours, they are attractively coloured in a tank. In a harshly lighted basin at the retailer’s they certainly do not show to advantage and should most likely become non-sellers. Another problem is the extreme sensibility against bacterial fin rot. Several breeders reported about heavy losses caused by this disease. They are supposed to be very aggressive, but this is relative. Against other fishes they are even very friendly. Over a longer period I had co-housed two couples of Hong Kong paradise fishes and two couples of Macropodus sp. ”rotrucken” without any problems even if all four couples Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) spawned at the same time. However among each other they can get very spiteful. Sometimes we have losses, especially with halfgrown fishes when they begin to fight out their hierarchy. Then the keeper must carefully observe the fishes and separate them, if necessary. But as soon as the couples find each other there are almost no losses anymore. During spawning, there may be some fights between the partners from time to time. Really serious injuries can be avoided by putting two couples into directly neighbouring tanks at the same time soo they can concentrate their aggression or better their willingness to protect their nest and the larvae against each other fish, upon their neighbours without hurting each other. With regard to the possible keeping outdoors, the same rules should apply as for the paradise fishes from North Vietnam. Macropodus sp. “rotrucken” – Macropodus spechti var. erythropterus, Herder & Freyhof, 2002 Herder & Freyhof described the Macropodus sp. „rotrucken“ as a second new species of the genus of macropodus, certainly one of the most attractive kinds of these fishes. The natural distribution area is near to the city of 43 to purchase relatively young fishes which grow up together. Then grown-up macropodus will be less aggressive, because they know one another. The eponymous red colour on the back is very much intensified when you feed the fishes with frozen krill. A cold hibernation also seems to intensify the blaze of colours. The black Macropodus – Macropodus spechti Schreitmüller, 1936 Macropodus spechti var. erytroptherus (Photo: T. Seehaus) M. opercularis „albino “isn’t as robust as wild ones. (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) Dong Hoi in North Vietnam. This species make similar demands on being kept outdoors like the other North Vietnamese paradise fishes. The Macropodus sp. „rotrucken“ is supposed to be very aggressive, too, what I cannot confirm without restriction. The behaviour of these fishes is strongly dependent on the conditions in the tank. Permanently high temperatures often cause aggressive behaviour. A cool phase below 15 degrees during the winter months does the fishes good and prevents conflicts reliably. In spring, when the temperatures rise again, the fishes get in the mood fpr mating and the quarrels increase. Now it is time to separate them, if necessary, in order to avoid severe injuries. When the tank is well structured and offers enough possibilities to hide, it is possible to keep two pairs in an 80 cm tank. It’s ideal 44 This species has already been known for a long time. For ages it has been assumed that the black macropodus come from the environs of the old imperial town Hue in Vietnam. However since it is possible to visit Vietnam again, wild macropodus have been imported, too, which clearly differ from the tank stock known by now. These fishes are absolutely not colourless as the name lets us assume. The body shows a more or less strong blue glimmer when lit it up at the sides. The back is dark reddish brown. All in all, this form from the environs of Hue appears as a darker copy of the Macropodus sp. “rotrucken”. It is interesting to see that the wild form from Hue has primarily got a tail as a fork with elongated outward fin rays whereas the rays of the fishes living in tanks are also elongated but situated more in the middle of the back. Further in the south, but still northern of the Sea Cloud Pass in central Vietnam, you find another kind of the black Macropodus. Normally these fishes cannot be differentiated from the one from Hue. However they show a very interesting change of colour when mating. Both sexes get black and light grey vertical binders so that they almost look like black and white paradise fishes! That was the reason why they have been called “Black Tiger” for a long time. Jens Kühne and Dietrich Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Schaller were able to identify more precisely the place where the “Black Tiger” was found. It is in a valley in the north of the Sea Cloud Pass near the village Noi Tron. Even though it has been doubted for a long time, it could be proved that the black macropodus was also found in the areas in the south of the Sea Cloud Pass from where they were then brought to Europe (Jörg Töpfer, Jens Kühne). Offspring of two location variants has been distributed to members of the IGL in the meantime, Lam Co (Sea Cloud Pass) and Nam O (in the south of the Sea Cloud Pass). It is exciting to realize that the males of these two variants have got the same fin forms as the old tank stocks! These points very much to the theory of Schaller that the first imports to Europe came from the environs of Da Nang and not from the environs of Hue area. The black macropodus are quite thermophillic and should not be kept below 15 degrees for a longer time. M. spechti from Hue. (Photo: T. Seehaus) Keeping outdoors Aquarists especially like garden ponds and tubs or tanks on the balcony, as they offer the possibility to arrange the garden or the balcony in an attractive manner and to set special effects. Since we, the aquarists, tend to populate each vessel which can be filled with aquatic life-forms, it is not astonishing that these waters are often populated by tank fishes resistant to cold. We have to distinguish between all-year and seasonal outdoor keeping only during the summer months. As aforementioned, the stocks from the most northerly distribution area in the north and the middle of China also cope with longer frozen waters. The decisive factor for the success of a planned outdoor hibernation is on the one hand the length of the frost period and on the other hand the depth of the water. Macropodus spechti from the botanical garden in Halle. (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) Garden ponds which reach at least at one point the depth of approx. one metre do normally not freeze up during German winters. The water is deep enough so that a zone with a temperature of 4 degrees can develop at the deepest point in the water. The fishes are capable of hibernating in this zone without any problem. Normally macropodus meet their need of oxygen by breathing atmospheric air like the most of the other labyrinth Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 fishes. In fact this is impossible in a frozen pond, but usually that is not a problem at all, because the metabolism of the fishes at 4 degrees is in such a way reduced that the gill breathing is sufficient. If you over winter macropodus in the cellar at temperatures well below 10 degrees you observe that the fishes only rarely take a breath at the surface. In case that the pond is not very large you should remove the leaves and the rotten plants before the frost 45 period starts in order to reduce oxygen consuming processes. If the mentioned needs are fulfilled you can keep the Korean round tail macropodus outdoors all year round for example. As far as they do not have any competitors with regard to other fish species, e. g. sticklebacks, they will continuously reproduce themselves. If one can forego the feeding is to be decided individually. In case that the pond is large enough and the stocking rate is not that high, the macropodus will find sufficient food. Of course the pond should be well planted, ideally with water lily and other water plants with floating leaves. It should also be equipped with a marsh zone with a low water level which can be planted with fontinalis and other closely growing marsh plants. Now you have the ideal whereabouts for young fishes. Many infusorians and crustaceans grow in fontinalis which serve as food for them. Scavengers with a minimum length of approx. 3 cm are good companions over a longer period. I co-housed macropodus and cloud mountain minnows (Tanichthys albonubes and T. micagemmae) without any noticeable losses among the barbs. Additionally to the ponds, tubs are a good solution as a summer domicile for other less temperature sensitive tank fishes being. Mortar tubs are available in different sizes and for less money in the building centres. They should be placed where they are not exposed to the solar radiation the whole day. If necessary, they can be enclosed by plant tubs, providing shadow during the hottest hours in the summer as well as avoid that the water will be overheated. Moreover the less attractive tubs can be hidden a little by plants. Clever do-it-yourself men can coat them with various materials like reed matting or planks. Little plastic ponds which are placed into bigger wooden boxes filled with sand are very nice too. They can be covered by plants, too. The plants covering the tubs serve as decoration as well as practical purposes. On the one hand they reduce the danger that the fishes jump out and on the other hand they attract a lot of vermin, some of which will fall into the water and serve as a welcome delicacy for the macropodus. more spawn than the females which hibernated in the cellar. So it did not even hurt them. Most other macropodus should not survive such handling, but the fishes from Korea must also get through hard winters in their country. In case that fishes shall hibernate outdoors, one can try to keep a part of the tank free of ice by means of a small heating rod. As substrate one can fill in some gravel into the tubs. Small water lilies and water marginals are suitable for being planted. Rigid hornwort, pondweed or other aquatic plants fill out the body of the water and give the fishes the possibility of shelter. Water cabbages, water hyacinths, water chestnuts and floating water mosses are more adequate plants for the tubs of course for a tank which is placed in the shadow on the balcony. But please notice the following! As nice and interesting Macropodus are they are not part of our local fauna and don’t belong into water outside of our control. Please take care that your Macropodus do not get from your garden pond into natural waters. It is not very probable that they can settle here in the long run, but it is not to be excluded, too. Our remaining nature has enough to fight against adulterations of fauna. When the plants are grown, the summer visitors can be put in. Macropodus continuously spawn in tubs, too. Since the young fishes do not find so many opportunities to retreat as in a pond one has to be more attentive. In general macropodus do not hunt their own young. It is more or less the elder young that decimate their younger brothers and sisters. The big advantage of tubs over garden ponds is that they can easily be fished out in autumn. The pure water plants can over winter in tubs. As tubs mostly stand free, they totally freeze up during longer and stronger frost periods. This would be fatal for the fishes. However it also happened to me two times that I overlooked a female of the Korean round tail macropodus. Once there was a long period of permafrost even at the Bergstraße. It lasted several weeks so that I really thought that the tubs contained massive ice. But the fishes survived and started with much 46 Literature Freyhof J. & Herder F. 2002. Review of the paradise fishes of the genus Macropodus in Vietnam, with description of two new species from Vietnam and southern China (Perciformes: Osphronemidae). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, vol. 13(2): 147-167. Paepke H.-J. 1994. Die Paradiesfische. Die neue Brehm-Bücherei Bd. 616, Magdeburg. Chan B.P.L. & Töpfer J. 2000. Bemerkungen zu einem neuen Fundort des Schwarzen Makropoden, Macropodus concolor Ahl, 1937. Der Makropode, 22(9/10):115-117. Seehaus T. & Schmidt J., 2002. Ihr Hobby Makropoden – Paradiesfische. Ruhmannsfelden. Seehaus, T. 2005. Makropoden Fische nicht nur für das Aquarium. Aquaristik, 12(6): 60-65. Seehaus, T. 2006. Makropoden Teil 2: Die Haltung im Freiland. Aquaristik, 13(1): 54-58. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Team Betta Species determination in the group of the stocky, bubble nest building fighting fish (group of Betta splendens) By Martin Hallmann & Michael Scharfenberg We would like to ignore all human cultivated forms and populations originating from those, even though it is almost impossible in practice. We cannot always notice, if a human hand is involved or not. In obvious cases one should not judge the appearance because this would only lead to further falsification and confusion when comparing them with wild ones. Thus, highly glittering, rudimentary veil tailed and pit-bull like fighting fishes are pets and creatures created by human hand even though, they were caught in the field. In the course of time you have an eye for it. The natural distribution area plays only partly a role regarding this species complex, since it has mostly been adulterated. While Betta imbellis is a type spread to the tropics (southern race), B. smaragdina/B. striktos is a northern race from the subtropical areas with strongly varying daytime and seasonal climate fluctuations. Betta “splendens” is not to be defined anymore due to cross breeding with B. imbellis and B. smaragdina as well as due to selective breeding. The influence of pets looking like splendens, on the wild forms by transport and by exposure is obvious. We are only able to guess the look of the wild form of Betta splendens. In fact this as species description is confused by types developed from a Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 mixture of Betta imbellis, selective breeding and wild forms, no clean definition has been done by now. At first confusion! Betta imbellis and Betta splendens hybridise,and there are from the left Betta imbellis, Khao Lak, Thailand © Martin Hallmann Betta imbellis Koh Samui, Thailand © Michael Scharfenberg Betta „splendensimbellis“, Taling Ngam, Koh Samui, Thailand © Martin Hallmann 47 from the left Betta imbellis, 3 km from Don, Phuket, Thailand © Michael Scharfenberg Betta imbellis, Klong Kala, Phuket, Thailand © Michael Scharfenberg Betta imbellis, Bang Tao, Phuket, Thailand © Martin Hallmann of the years and we have also caught many of them ourselves. There is no other wild form with a comparable variation ( apart from the reintroduced B. splendens). There were 5 or 6 distinguishable forms of B. imbellis from Ko Samui within the IGL. Both authors caught at least three clearly different forms on Phuket Island partly in the same habitat. transitional populations which are stable with regard to their genetic constitution. In the meantime we have obtained a number of location variants of Betta imbellis in the course Differently varying types attracted our attention in Khaolak, Ko Samui and Phuket. We would like to call them an interim form from Betta imbellis to B. splendens. While there were fishes clearly corresponding to the”standard“Betta imbellis, we also caught strong males with saddle-shaped mouth. The colour of the body was dark grey, relatively poor in shining scales and the red band of the caudal fin was indistinctly bordered towards the middle of the caudal fin like the body of B. splendens. The females showed a magnificent light brown colour without any shades of red in the caudal from the left Betta „splendensimbellis“, Khao Lak, Thailand © Martin Hallmann Betta „splendensimbellis“, Bang Tao, Phuket, Thailand © Martin Hallmann Betta „splendensimbellis“, Bang Tao, Phuket, Thailand © Martin Hallmann 48 fin. In contrast, it is interesting to see the Betta imbellis which we caught in the west of Malaysia appear absolutely homogeneous per location (Kemaman, Cherating and in the south of Kuantan). These fishes varied minimally, but the single individuals only differed within the scope we know for example from the slim red Betta. And what can we now deduce from this? Still nothing! There is only the fact that it is not easy to describe the species of Betta imbellis. At first you have to comment on the similarities of the forms classified as Betta imbellis, then to exclude more strongly deviating ones and finally to define ”imbellis” herewith: Magnificent coloration of Betta imbellis The magnificent coloration of the male Betta imbellis shows a nearly dark grey to black basic Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 colour for body and fins with lines of shining scales, red ventral fins with white and black point, a red anal fin point and a bordered bright red half-moon in the caudal fin. The fin membranes of the anal as well as caudal fins are patina coloured (Horst Linke uses this term in his book Labyrinthfische – Farbe im Aquarium for a good reason). These rays can partly overlay respectively supersede the red colour in the caudal fin fringe. The dorsal fin is patina coloured, too and it shows the pattern of a ladder. A slightly reddish touch can appear outer part of the dorsal fin. Most of the caudal fin, and sometimes the anal fin, too, is bordered in black. The patina colour of the shine scales intensifies to a partly flat shimmering colour at the pectoral fins. The operculum are also coloured in that way. With the definition of patina we now come to talk about inner specific differences! Although Horst Linke certainly herewith thought of the turquoise colour of corroded old copper surfaces (verdigris), Betta imbellis can show shimmering colours from light green over turquoise and clearly blue. There are also differences in the form of the red moon in the caudal fin. I did find a location form which didn’t show a touch of red in the caudal fin anymore. The B. imbellis “Kuantan” (location MK 316) as well as a location form from Phuket (see photo 5) show the red halfmoon which is strongly overlaid by radial rays. The same applies in principle to the red spot in the caudal fin which can be very small or which can take over almost the whole caudal fin as for the location type (Flora Bay) from Phuket. So there is a significant variation. Even the “safest” and assumed clearest distinctive mark – the colour of the operculum – is not uniform. I had fishes from Laos (commercial importation) with red oper- cula. Apart from this, they were typical B. imbellis and consistently coloured in their filial generations. There are all kinds of transitions of the habitus, from the typically slim, small stubheaded type to the high respectively saddle-dorsal type with big head. There are also certain stocks besides the short fin types which tend to long fins like Betta smaragdina. The maximal size of 4 – 5 cm (Ko Samui) is a little smaller than the southern species presumptions (B. imbellis) Before it is becoming more confusing we ask the question of the evenness. At first Betta imbellis seems to be a variable species. A “standard” form of Betta imbellis is defined by certain similarities. Differing from this some forms tend against Betta splendens. Infrequently we also find types showing only very few parts of red and tending to B. smaragdina (e. g. a type from KhaoLak). Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 from the left Betta imbellis, Kuantan, WestMalaysia © Martin Hallmann Betta smaragdina, Nong Bua Lam Phu, Issan, Thailand © Michael Scharfenberg Magnificent coloration of Betta smaragdina In contrast to B. imbellis and B. splendens, B. smaragdina generally shows a very homogenous form, pattering and coloration. The magnificent coloration is to be seen in the photos. The complete head and body of the forms of Betta smaragdina that we know appear flatly green (i.e. there are no individual spots on from the left Betta smaragdina, Khong, Laos © Martin Hallmann Betta stiktos, Stung Treng, NordOst-Kambodscha © Michael Scharfenberg 49 common characteristics of populations far away from settlements) from the left Betta splendens, Nonthamburi, Thailand © Michael Scharfenberg Betta splendens, Rayong, Thailand © Michael Scharfenberg the operculum). The metallic lustre of the whole body is typical for B. smaragdina. You only see the grey to reddish brown body colour on the forehead and in the scales framing which is reduced to a small net structure. The rays of the dorsal, anal and caudal fins are wine red, the membranes of the fins shine in green, and the anal fin shows steel blue colours on the base. The dorsal fin shows a ladder marking, the caudal fin and the anal fins show lines with dots. The ventral fins are dark salmon with a white point. The first ray of the ventral fin is black. Betta smaragdina is often very slim and long finned. Some location forms (Yasothon) reach a length up to 7 cm. Magnificent coloration of Betta stiktos Betta stiktos was only described in 2005 (Tan & Ng), because there obviously is a demarcated occurrence in Cambodia (Stung Treng, North- East Cambodia). At the first view you realize an astonishing similarity with regard to Betta smaragdina. The coloration of the fins leans con- siderably to the blue. This species is smaller and stockier. The profile of the head of Betta stiktos is flat compared to that of of B. smaragdina and it does not seem to tend to long fins as B. smaragdina. Since we know this form in the hobby only for a very short time, it remains to wait for how far “stiktos“ will adapt to Betta smaragdina within the next generations. Therefore we rather consider B. stiktos as a local variant respectively as a colour variety of Betta smaragdina. A definition in the meaning of a species position seems to be rather questionable. Now the problem The species of Betta splendens is actually even more difficult to define as B. imbellis. Firstly this results from the influence and the “mixture” of breeding forms (which can be hybrids themselves) with wild forms. In face of it we do not know how much influence exposed fishes have on the natural occurrence and how the wild “splendens” once looked like. Secondly the already mentioned transitions to “imbellis” confuse things as well. Besides the (short fin) breeding forms we however know a set of location forms (wild forms or exposed renaturalised forms?) of Betta splendens which you can describe as follows: Magnificent coloration of Betta splendens (construed by 50 Male Betta splendens show a magnificent coloration of an almost reddish brown to brownish grey regarding the colour of body and fins with none or few shimmering scales, red ventral fins, a lacklustre red anal fin and caudal fin. The membranes of the caudal fin now reallyshimmer with turquoise; the caudal fin shows a turquoise to true blue hem. The dorsal fin is turquoise and shows the pattern of a ladder, the point of the dorsal fin can be clearly red. Sometimes the caudal fin is bordered in black. The opercula are coloured in brownish black like the colour of the body. Sometimes there is a red dot respectively band on the operculum The characteristic of blue and red colours strongly varies according to the locations. Mostly the body is relatively not very high (photo 15) in the remote location forms (not very much influenced by exposed fighters), but not in to all of them. Betta splendens reaches a total length of 7 cm. Their body mass is mostly clearly higher than that of of Betta imbellis. We also know extremely slim and longish forms which do not differ from the forms of B. imbellis or B. smaragdina. The, mostly very bull-like forms, which show a flat shimmer on the back are not considered here, because they can be explained by to exposure to splendens. Effectively the species name “splendens = shiny” is only correct for breeding forms which indicates that the describer did not find really wild Betta splendens. These are not very coloured and absolutely not shiny. All in all you can recognize a (constant) influence of the “wild forms” by exposed tank stocks. It is to assume that – in the course of the generations – they will re-develop towards the archetype. But certain characteristics of the breeding forms Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 will obviously survive over many generations. Definition of species and mixture Due to the variation of B. splendens, this “species” is most difficultly to define. Morphological characteristics are not sufficient in order to clearly define the forms of B. imbellis, B. splendens and B. smaragdina. We assume that the types that we name B. splendens often bear genes of pets which were reintroduced into the wild. The breeding of fighters has a centuries-old tradition in Thailand and Betta imbellis are certainly affected by this in the south of Thailand, too, where the line from Khaolak (west coast, in the north of Phuket) to Ko Samui (border in the east) describes the northern distribution border of Betta imbellis. These fishes live here in a clear and white water and they consequently share the biotopes of Betta splendens. Further in the south, in the west of Malaysia, Betta imbellis typically populate slowly flowing black water streams and flood areas i. e. the typical Betta imbellis is actually a fish living in tropical areas. You find it in black water whereas Betta splendens and Betta smaragdina inhabit the subtropics. In the border area, the climatic conditions may be excellent for both species. This fact would explain a transitional zone where both species can live and form a hybrid. You find an untypical hybrid zone in the (subtropical) area of Siem Reap in Cambodia where B. splendens and Betta imbellis form hybrids and generate a varying transitional type. In contrast to the Malaysians, who are rather uninterested with regard to this item, the Thais and obviously the Khmers, too, are great breeders of fighting fishes and they surely do not ignore the local fishes. Pla Kat exists all over Thai- land, on the markets as well as “wild” fishes in the fields. Norbert Neugebauer reported that B. imbellis from Ko Samui were found/availableon Phuket! The same certainly happens to the B. splendens with short fins which you can buy on the markets of Ko Samui or Phuket. The hybridization of the fauna due to unintentional or deliberate exposure leads to genetically inhomogeneous types and to the types which deviate from the standards. Although the species of B. imbellis, B. smaragdina and B. splendens can still be crossbred, the existing crossing barrier and accommodation to the current climates as well as water types prevent the complete mixture. The standard types differ clearer from each other as many other fishes which are differentiated as species, for example Betta brownorum and Betta rutilans. It is just impossible to definitely differentiate the distribution areas because of the transition zone. All this should not spoil our fun. It shall make clear how difficult it is on the one hand to establish clear criteria for “species” and on the other hand how important it is to separate the local forms. Nowadays we do not find B. imbellis anymore ? n captivity with this slim black form and blue (not turquoise) fins which we all know from many pictures. They were lost in the mass of different colours. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 from the left Betta splendens, Siem Reap, Kambodscha © Jens Kühne Betta „splendensimbellis“, Siem Reap, Kambodscha © Michael Scharfenberg Exemplary examples of unclear forms: 1. Betta sp. „Mahachai“ Fishes which are not fully coloured resemble Betta imbellis in their (normally) striped coloration, in the length of their fins as well in their stature. The coloration of their head shows two clear blue operculum bars like B. imbellis. Males and females have 1 -3 rows of shining spots on their back and three faded vertical stripes in their normal coloration. In flagrant contrast to B. imbellis there are not any pure shades of red in the fins. The patterning of the dissimilar fins reminds of Betta smaragdina, even though the coloration looks less green than blue. However the magnificent coloration is only superficially similar to the one of Betta smaragdina. On the brown almost black body colour (like B. imbellis) you see vertical stripes of shining spots and not a flat coloration. Furthermore B. sp. “Mahachai” show a light green first fin ray in the ventral fins. When you take a closer look they also show clear deviations from Betta smaragdina. We do not know anything for certain 51 from the left Betta sp. „Mahachai“ (Photo: T. Kemeter) Betta imbellis, gelbe Variante, Bildsimulation © Martin Hallmann Betta imbellis, Koh Samui, Thailand © Martin Hallmann yet, we can only guess. Scientists rack their brains over this form with the relatively isolated distribution area in the south of Bangkok. In the simplest case it is a hereditary solid breeding form of the Thais making them independent. Influences of B. imbellis and B. smaragdina are to be recognized from our point of view, because Betta sp. “Mahachai” resemble the types of B. splendens at first sight. Nevertheless I know pictures of breeding forms (B. splendens possibly crossbred with B. smaragdina) which show fishes with similar structure of the patterning respectively coloration. 2. Betta sp. „Siem Reap“ Fishes from this group were independently caught by Linke/ Hermann and Kühne in the surroundings of Ankor Wat/Cambodia. It is difficult to describe them as they vary from “splendens” to “imbellis” in all facets. Therefore we find here the rather reliable evidence that Betta splendens and Betta imbellis generate hybrids and that variable intermediate forms arise. Please compare the two photos concerning Betta sp. “Siem Reap”. It is not possible to reconstruct anymore which form originally existed or if both were created by human hand. Parallel there are still some peculiarities. We have two peculiar forms whose coloration we could not explain at first: a colour form of Betta imbellis from Penang which was caught by Bernd Keiler in the 80s. Some of the offspring showed yellow spots instead of the red colouring. At that time we assumed that this would be a mutant with a colour deficiency or the influence of exposed Pla Kats. The second peculiarity is a Betta “imbellis” from Ko Samui (compare the photos) whose appearance in the youth indeed corresponded to the attached photo 1. When the fish grew older it completely lost its red coloration and today it shows flat turquoise fins. The fighting fishes which we found in the near of settlements are neverheless obviously often hybrids. Summary It is only sometimes unambiguous to compare definitively the forms that we know. It mostly becomes more difficult when you take a closer look. Everybody knows how easy you may 52 go into a skid when you want to differentiate the “species” of Betta splendens, Betta imbellis and Betta smaragdina/striktos. You would have to define the criteria of the described species. This is not easy, since the species occur in geographic breeds with different forms of fins, coloration and habit. (Varying colorations depend on the mood and the influence of light can of course mislead). There are obviously intermediate forms in neighbouring distribution areas. Here you particularly find aggravating individual distinctions. They scatter between the extremes or they approach another species in many points (Phuket). We have to start from the fact that there is a potential and unintended hybridization in the inhabited areas (which are not concerned here?) of the “wild forms” with former “pets”. The Thais are great breeders of fish and enthusiasts of Pla Kat! They have already inserted active or passive gene material of all three species. While the appearance of Betta imbellis and B. smaragdina is plainly to be defined at a large extent, it is very unclear with regard to Betta splendens. Here we have many colour races and breeding forms that can again be caught after being exposed. We can only guess which form of Betta splendens is said to be the original one. Because of the global popularity of Pla Kat (the fighter B. splendens) and pot fishes (pets) – also in the distri- Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 bution areas of B. imbellis and B. smaragdina – it is certainly usual to crossbreed different forms for embellishment or enhancement of the aggressiveness. Think of our small animal breeders. Even though one can suppose that a species is formed and determined by its habitat (climate, water body …) and therefore – in terms of evolution – most of the genes of the breeding forms get lost, we have to consider the following: it is difficult to look the genetic history of a Betta which was caught by oneself or even bought on the market. If the fishes remain somewhat homozygous (in the meaning of the visible characteristics of the corresponding species), they are listed in our stock list. Nevertheless we get surprised again and again. Of course all these examinations are dependent on systematic definitions. The moment from when a status of species is justified or when you talk about a subspecies, is a question of adequacy and in the eye of the beholder and in practice of course in the dimension of the analysed collection of material (are there any intermediate forms or not) and in the used differentiation raster. Our “term” of species is a model that functions only roughly. Taking a closer look you recognize that our fighting fishes do not always stick to the rules. The Thai call all fighting fishes Pla Kat. Simple identification key for stocky, bubble nest building Betta – wild forms (only males in magnificent coloration to be determined), without breeding forms and hybrids By Karl-Heinz Roßmann Betta splendens 1 Head without shining scales, no black or red opercula spot 1* Head with shining scales 3 3 Shining scales flat on the whole operculum and on side of the head 5 3* Shining scales on the operculum in two clearly separated fields 4 Anal fin with red point, caudal fin with bordered red half-moon And black hem Betta imbellis Anal fin and caudal fin without red sections with turquoise iridescent fin membranes. Fin rays wine red to grey. Betta sp. „Mahachai“ 5 Fish with a length of 5 -7 cm, rather straight front line Betta smaragdina 5* Fish smaller with round front Betta stiktos 4* Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 4 53 Team Trichogaster/Trichopodus/Trichopsis Gouramis of the genus Trichogaster – the new problematic fishes? By Karl-Heinz Roßmann Meanwhile the scene is a classical one: someone buys a pair of dwarf gouramis in the pet shop, beautiful big fishes. He still thinks: “Anyway, why are they called dwarf gouramis?” He puts them into a properly prepared tank and enjoys them almost for four weeks. Then the disaster takes its course, the fishes get big stomachs, goggle-eyes, ulcers and die a few days later. The poor aquarist thinks of a mistake in keeping these fishes. He tries it once again – with the same effect. Since our aquarist has done everything correct by now, it was probably the fault of the fishes. In future he well keeps his fingers off the gouramis. Unfortunately not only off the dwarf gouramis, no, he gives from the left Trichogaster chuna-male (Photo: H.-J. Richter) Trichogaster chuna-female (Photo: K.-H. Roßmann) Trichogaster chuna a mating pair (Photo: J. Vierke) a wide berth to all species of Trichogaster. The elder aquarists surely remember that the small western gouramis were not difficult at all in order to be kept in former times. You could buy Trichogaster lalius as small German offspring in each good pet shop and on many fish exchanges you could find T. labiosa as well as T. chuna after their late first import, whereas T. fasciata has never been offered often in pet shops. I can remember that T. labiosa was the first labyrinth fish which I bred and that was easy going in the 60s. Now we have two possibilities to explain: either the fishes have altered or the aquarists have. Maybe both are true and maybe this is also different with regard to the four species. Let’s go through the species according to their level of difficulty: At first the one which is the easiest to be kept: Trichogaster chuna (Hamilton, 1822), honey gourami. 54 Despite contrary fears and legends this fish is available in good and healthy quality in the most respectable pet shops which means of course that everybody who has not been successful with T. chuna has bungled it by oneself. After a hot and try period from February to May the monsoon follows with extreme rainfalls and then a cool and dry period from October to January. Therefore the honey gourami has to bear differences in temperature between 10 and 30 degrees C and it easily bears even more. So the maxim for keeping honey gouramis has to be: rough but heartily. This applies to all Trichogaster except for T. labiosa. T. chuna tolerates nothing worse than evenly “optimal” conditions. Therefore T. chuna was more stable with unreliable heaters and the feeding with dried daphnia in the past than today with a best-balanced feeding and heaters holding the temperature at exactly half a degree. As all Bengalis honey gourami survive the best Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 in unheated tanks with distinct difference between winter and summer. In case that T. chuna are kept in heated tanks, the heater should at least be switched off at night. The food should be highfibre; the best are daphnia and Cyclops. Concerning the water value nothing worries the honey gourami less. They are the best adapted to variations of the water values in habitats with very rainy and very dry periods. One of the worst enemies of T. chuna is perfectly working reverse osmosis. T. chuna, T. lalius and T. fasciata feel most comfortable in garden ponds. With regard to breeding, the honey gourami is the easiest of all, quite simple, because it has the biggest offspring of all Trichogaster. But they are still tiny compared to young Bettas for example which means of course that they cannot immediately be fed with fresh artemia nauplii. In the first days it must be nothing else but infusorians or rotifers. First of all you need a bubble nest in order to get offspring. The one of T. chuna is very big, coarsepearl-shaped and in one layer, i.e. the male only builds one big foam carpet, large enough to be seen by the females even from a distance. Additionally the female will be courted to the nest by the male with vertical body and distinct leading swimming. Attacks upon the female and wild hunting which you can watch with other gouramis, do not happen with T. chuna, mainly because the male is considerably smaller the female. After mating, the eggs are collected into a small clump that is kept floating by some fine bubbles. The original bubble nest crumbles. Now the male intensively cares for the clump whereas the female cooperates in defending the area, however primarily against other females of honey gouramis. Trichogaster chuna are quite able to defend their territory. They can harry their associates in small tanks, but – and now comes the positive aspect – if you keep the modest T. chuna properly, they will thank it double and threefold with their cheeky charm of a poison dwarf and their brilliant colours. The next difficultis the Trichogaster labiosa Day, 1878, the thick lipped gourami from Burma, where it occupies the lowlands at the coast near Rangoon up to the plateau of the lake Inle. This area is considerably further in the south than the distribution area of the Indian gouramis. Therefore T. labiosa prefer it a little and more constantly warmer. After the honey gourami, T. labiosa is the most suited for tanks: longliving, resistant to stress and even in community tanks hardly to be stopped from spawning. If there only would not be the horrible oodinium! I think only chocolate gouramis are even more sensitive to it than T. labiosa. Fortunately (and unfortunately for keepers of chocolates) oodin- Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Trichogaster chuna „Gold“ (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) ium only occurs in soft water. T. labiosa which often live in relative hard water in their wild life – in the lake Inle for example – is therefore best kept at a water temperature of about 15 degrees (15°GH). But it may also be 20 degrees (20°GH). Thus: Please keep away from this expensive osmosis system! If everything suits it fine, T. labiosa soon start to build their bubble nest without any problems in community tanks, too. These fishes are similarly as assertive as T. chuna, but due to their size of up to 8 cm, they have clearly more drive. The males of T. labiosa which defend their from the left Trichogaster labiosa (Photo: E. Sänger) Trichogaster labiosa (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) Trichogaster labiosa (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) 55 Trichogaster lalius (Photo: H. Linke) territory can even make dwarf cichlids’ life hard. So, even in the time of nano-aquaristics: big tanks! For two pairs of T. labiosa it should really be a tank of one meter. It cannot do any harm if the tank has got a reasonable water level so that the females can take shelter near the substrate. The thick-lipped gourami builds a simple, flat, coarse pearl-shaped bubble nest with bubbles blown some distance to the nest and then brought to the nest. Floating plants which grow directly near the nest are pushed to the nest with the mouth. You cannot observe any courtship display; perhaps this is only because the fishes cannot from the left Trichogaster lalius „blue“ (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) Trichogaster lalius (Photo: K.-H. Roßmann) Trichogaster lalius „red“ (Photo: H.-J. Richter) live outside the big space they require in normal tanks. In case that the female which is in the vaccinity of the male anyway, she cannot be mated outside and then led to his territory. After many observations I have the impression the courtship display of Trichogaster labiosa and the nearly related T. fasciata is that the female approaches the territory of the displaying male until she has been noticed. Thereupon the female is “welcomed” with raised fins and then very heavily chased away. This behaviour does not keep the female from returning a few minutes later and this can last several days before spawning. It has nothing to do with the fact that the bubble nest has not been finished yet. In case of emergency, this procedure could take half an hour. What is more, the conflict of encounter will hereby be moderated and the maturity of the spawn will be synchronised. The spawning can only take place when the female responds to the male’s display behaviour in the right way. She has rapidly to swim in the male’s flank and to show her intentions with some bites. The female only behaves that way when the time for spawning has arrived. Each hesitation means the time for spawning has not come yet and will be answered by an immediate attack. Just like in real life, the gourami which raises the children wants to be asked a little. In contrast to Betta, Macropodus and the most other labyrinth fishes the female has to leave the nest after spawn- 56 ing in a hurry. After a successful spawning, the female disappears from the territory of the male. It has nothing to do with the further care of the spawn and she is well advised to hide in the tank until it is ready for spawning again and to get in touch with the male “to be driven away” again. Young T. labiosa are very small, like all gouramis and they have to be fed with infusorians or rotifers for a few days until they begin to take artemia nauplii. The biggest problem with the young is their proneness to oodinium. There is no oodinium in hard water. If you want to breed T. labiosa in soft water, you should add one teaspoon of common salt per 5 litres of water to the breeding tank. Then the Artemia live longer, too. If you have engaged yourself with aquaristics for a while, you know: the more tropical the fish, the easier it is to keep. And the further north the native land of a fish, the more difficult it can be. Nothing is easier than to keep the conditions constantly at an optimum by the corresponding technical equipment. It will be difficult, if an optimum does not mean constantly. This is the problem we have with the two most northern gouramis Trichogaster lalius (Hamilton, 1822) and Trichogaster fasciata Bloch & Schneider, 1801. Their common distribution area is in the north of India, the south of Nepal and in Bangladesh. Occurrences in Pakistan are probable, alleged locations in Burma, Thailand and Malaysia - as mentioned in Mak- Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 ropode 3/08, page 77 – are based on mistakes. The most northern habitats of both species in the Indian and Pakistani Panjab are approximately in the latitude of south Turkey, where the continental climate in India still intensifies the differences between winter and summer. In Delhi ,the Indian capital, there are such night frosts in January every few decades so that even homeless persons freeze to death on the streets, whereas in summer the temperatures regularly rise up to more than 40 degrees C. Fortunately the imported T. lalius and T. fasciata do not come out of this hell, but from such a comfortable place like Calcutta where the winters are at least not so cold. This means that the aquarium temperatures for T. lalius and T. fasciata have to be managed in the same way as for T. chuna, but here we are not yet out of the wood. It is difficult to purchase striped gouramis, Trichogaster fasciata; in good health (I am going to ignore the discussion regarding T. bejeus this time). We find offspring from Southeast Asia on the market. I will report about the problem with these fishes later in connection with T. lalius. Most commonly, wild gouramis are casually imported from the area of Calcutta. They are mostly not very attractive, very shy, very sensitive to stress and very aggressive against females. I was only once successful in breeding such fishes and this happened in a garden pond. The wild ones looked like the T. bejeus which we know from pictures, but the offspring could hardly be distinguished from those you can find on the market. I failed to continue to breed them mainly because they were all males. You must take a very close look at the offspring of T. fasciata you acquire on the market. You are on the safe side when you persuade your personal pet merchant to receive the fishes from the wholesaler and to pick them up without being unpacked before. Nothing is worse for T. fasciata than the barrage of germs in the tanks of the pet shops. The breeding of T. fasciata is not that easy, too. You can very well consider these gouramis as the most sensitive to stress. Newly bought adult fishes mostly need a longer time until they trustingly come out of their covering. They often remain invisible for days after you have worked on the tank or even altered the equipment. It mostly helps to add a little swarm of fishes which like to swim a lot without being too hectic. White cloud mountain minnows or other small cyprinids are well suited. While other gouramis define a territory and spawn in a correspondingly equipped and occupied community tank, T. fasciata must stay alone. It is very stressful for them to be moved into another tank and to settle there again. The breeding tank has to stand calm; otherwise you only notice Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 the ugly noise of your T. fasciata when they swim in fright against the rear window. Above all they are extremely rough against females.. It seems that wild hunting of male to female belong to the normal courtship display of T. fasciata and T. labiosa. The females actively expose themselves to this situation again and again. They probably test the fitness and the willingness of the males in order to defend their territory in this way. Sometimes it ends fatally for the female in tanks without enough space to escape which means that you should never keep the very vivacious T. fasciata in tanks which are too small for the breeding. A length of 50 cm is the minimum, 60 cm are better. Trichogaster fasciata build the “sloppiest” bubble nest of all gouramis, but they use a ridiculous amount of effort. They form rough bubbles with their mouth and expel small ones out of the gills, only to find that they decompose half an hour later. Finally, they probably spawn somewhere completely different. Just as for Trichogaster chuna, it seems that T. fasciata build the bubble nest more for courtship than for brood care purposes. We also know this from some chifrom the left Trichogaster fasciata (Photo: H. Linke) Two T. fasciata-males (Photo: K.-H. Roßmann Trichogaster fasciata-male (Photo: K.-H. Roßmann) 57 clids whose males dig gigantic spawn holes although the care of the brood takes place in the female’s mouth. Young T. fasciata are very small, like all young of Trichogaster. They must be fed with rotifers or infusorians a whole week long before they begin to accept artemia. Then you have won, they grow very quickly. After the first phase of development, when the young start to look like their parents and to breathe with their labyrinth, it is advised to keep themcolder, 22 degrees C is enough. The same applies for all other species of Trichogaster. We remember that a colder period begins in India after the monsoon when the fishes start to spawn. According the old literature and to my experiences we herewith avoid the high death rate which threatens the fishes during the development of their labyrinths, but which has in fact absolutely nothing to do with the development of the labyrinths. Kept like this the fishes are sexually mature after six months. The dwarf gourami Trichogaster lalius (Hamilton, 1822) is a special one. Without any doubt they are the most beautiful ambassadors of their species. Francis Day called them “the most beautiful little fish I’ve ever seen”. There is nothing to be added. But they are the most problematical ones, too. Despite every pet shop offering them, even in different breeding forms whose aesthetical value is much disputed. How can it be? The magic word is free-range husbandry which is of course possible without any difficulty in Bangkok, Hong Kong or Singapore all year round. The fishes are separated according to their sex as soon as possible and raised in big and bleak concrete tanks. Since all impulsion for a courtship behaviour is missing, the fishes grow up to a size that wild fishes and also tank offspring would never reach. When these double-sized fishes are offered on the markets, they are only 9 months old and have already lived most of their life, since T. lalius is a short-lived fish. More than one year is normally not possible, unless you keep these fishes in an environment which is free of stress and without “sex and drugs and Rock’n Roll”. But who wants to live like that? Kept as pairs in an equipped tank, the fishes are hardly to be prevented from spawning. Most of the time they begin to spawn immediately the next day or the day after tomorrow and then again and again in the interval of a few days. After four weeks the fishes are burnt out and become victim of the several infections that they have brought from Asia or from the European pet shops. If there is now a clever aquarist who seizes the opportunity with both hands and tries to rear this offspring, he will mostly suffer an unpleasant surprise. The young which developed well initially start to get ulcers. They have saucer eyes and big bellies. Not only one fish reaches the sexual maturity. It seems that the commercial stocks have been kept under very clean conditions lasting for decades with plenty of antibiotics so that they are unable to resist the normal stress in the tanks. The only possibility to get healthy breeding stocks is either to start with wild ones which are actually imported from time to time, or to try to keep fishes from old tank stocks. Some time ago you could more and more find very nice and healthy animals on the markets which came from Poland or the Czech Republic. They had the advantage over the wild ones from India that they are not so shy. You see them very rarely in the tank and this shyness eases up only slowly despite several generations of offspring. At the moment dwarf gouramis from Bangladesh are bred within the IGL which are oddly enough 58 absolutely not shy, not even the wild ones. The small size of the wild fishes and their European offspring is remarkable. When looking at these fishes you can understand why the old aquarists called them dwarf gouramis. Trichogaster lalius are hard to prevent from spawning under good conditions. As fishes which spawn during the Monsoon, within hours, they quit the standby mode in which they await the rainy season under natural conditions. When you start with healthy fishes you normally have the first clutch within 48 hours and others will very quickly follow. Dwarf gouramis are masters of building bubble nests. They build a nest approximately 5 cm in diameter by means of a few bubbles of using alga filaments, moostwines, roots of floating plants and all other possible materials which they sometimes gather from far distances. This creation is so solid that you can take it out of the water with your fingers without damaging it. Females that are ready for spawning are lured by the male’s impressive behaviour. In order to lure her under the nest the male – swimming sideward - spreads its fins so that his “girl” can see the whole brilliance. Newly-hatched dwarf gouramis really are the smallest existing labyrinth fishes. They need powder food during the first ten days until they greedily accept the first artemia nauplii. From then it is easy. All gouramis do not make heavy demands on food. It should only be high-fibre. Gouramis devour a lot and they are good doers. It is recommended to feed them with “the handbrake on”. This is the only way how you get small, “wellformed” and colourful fishes. Alas - Yep! Dwarf gouramis do not think much of reverse osmosis systems. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Team Prachtguramis – Parosphromenus and Malpulutta Licorice gourami in tanks: Basic facts and recommendations By Peter Finke 1. Requirements The team of licorice gourami primarily works on labyrinth fishes of the genus of Parosphromenus, a relatively unified group of small fishes (the maximum size of most species is 4 cm). In the courtship dress of the males they are exceptionally gorgeous fishes coming from virgin forest streams in Malaysia and Indonesia. A lot of aquarists do not know this species, because you rarely find them in pet shops. They are even not mentioned in most books about aquaristics. Moreover these are fantastic fishes which are ideal for being kept in tanks in a way. However they are almost all threatened in their existence. So we have to pay them special attention. The monotype Malpulutta was added to the team of licorice gourami only for pragmatic reasons. This genus is not closely related to Parosphromenus, but demands similar keeping conditions. Since you need a certain effort for this, it is likely to entrust Malpulutta kretseri to this team. At the beginning of the engagement with “Paros” you should get straight one thing in your mind: Licorice gouramis demand a partial change in thinking. Our other aquarist customs are not necessarily suitable for these fan- tastic fishes. The model of the brightly illuminated community tank which contains many kinds of plants and large-scale technical equipment, fails here. Even the wish only to keep these rare and threatened fishes is not a good idea at all. They are life-forms for small, even very small tanks of their own where they multiply nearly without our assistance and only then they show their interesting behaviour. 2. The species At present 18 species of Parosphromenus are scientifically described, but we still know quite a number of further species/forms which have not been described yet. How many of them are real species, is actually hard to say. In the last Paro census from autumn 2008 we distinguished 64 forms from which we found 49 in the team; in the meantime we have got 50 forms in the tank stock. (For the general systematology of licorice gourami cp. M. Hallmann, 3/2008, p. 95-99; tbc). You can roughly distinguish two groups. On the one hand the two small species with very slim bodies – P. parvulus and P. ornaticauda – and on the other hand all others. In some ways P. sumatranus mediates between both groups. In the Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 big remaining group you find the largest species which is known by now P. quindecim (the males can reach a length up to 6 cm)), species with drawn-out caudal filaments (et al. P. paludicola, P. filamentous, P. deissneri), with monochrome fins (P. anjunganensis) and with spotted unpaired fins which also show dots on the side of the body (P. linkei, P. pahuensis), as well as the large group of animals with round caudal whose ribbon like pattern takes up the one of the unpaired fins. Particularly one subgroup of this group strikes here as very homogeneous, the so-called group of P. harvey (among others with P. harveyi, P. tweedei, P. bintan, P. rubrimontis, P. alfredi) whose species classification is partly especially difficult and controversial. Almost every year variations are discovered whose classification cannot be determined (e. g. only in 2008 the forms from Sumatra: spec. Dabo, spec. Danau Rasau, spec. Langgam, spec. Sungaibertam, spec. Danau Calak, spec. Pematunglumut; all these were caught for the first time and imported by Horst Linke). All species may die out, because of their binding to shadowy, acid streams of the tropical rain forest which quickly collapse by the demolition of the virgin forest through fire or for the building 59 4. Where can I get licorice gouramis? from the left Malpulutta kretseri (Photo J. Schmidt) Malpulutta kretseri (Photo H. Linke) of plantations. Unfortunately it is probable that some species have already disappeared which we have not known by now and it is to fear that this will happen to other unknown forms because of the bad exploration of many areas – especially in the east parts of Borneo. Dependent on the Rains and the accessibility of the known habitats which have not been destroyed yet, Paros are caught in quantities and exported particularly to Japan and Europe whereas the characterization of the species is often not sufficient and also deliveries of mixed species occur under only one name. Mistakes as will as mixings (the females are often only hard to distinguish) are frequent. All in all the commerce with Paros makes up an infinitely small part of the international business with ornamental fishes whereas Bangkok and Singapore accommodate the most important stations of export. 3. Two important factors: the right water and food Two elementary factors have to be cleared once and for all before you start to keep licorice gouramis: you need very soft and acid water as well as varied life-food. Before these two problems have basically not been solved, you shouldn’t go ahead. There are good solutions for both nowadays; however you have to put in a certain effort for this purpose. Water with a carbonate hardness over 1 -2 is not suited; the conductibility should not exceed approximately 60 micro siemens/cm. It is not important how you achieve this. The pH value should be in an acid or strong acid range (approximately 4 – 6.5, the last one is often sufficient, but not with regard to a few species such as e. g. P. parvulus). Acidification by peat is good, but other methods are successful, too. The use of some alder pinecones is recommended, a leaf of the sea almond tree helps to reduce the germs. (see below). Cyclops, black and white glass worms, moina and artemia serve as a good food for Paros; the last two ones can easily be bred at home. Please avoid one-sidedness. Frozen food is not always accepted. You should do it without it anyway, because you herewith may risk stretching the water of the small Paro tanks. From time to time you can feed grindal worms or small daphnia. Flying food is normally not accepted, since Paros do not swim on the surface. They despise every dry food. Both factors are not only pre-conditions for a successful aquaristic of licorice gouramis; they are connected in the matter, too. As Paros are well to be kept and to be bred in very small tanks (see below), it is important to show discipline in feeding in order to not overstrain these small water bodies in the tanks. How to feed them in an economic and adapted manner should be learnt in any case; it helps the fishes to preserve their health. 60 First of all: all species are interesting. You should not insist on one definite species which then is not available for a longer time, but you should be open for those which are currently offered in good condition. At present most species/ forms are basically available from the experts of the “Paro team” (see below) in Europe (mainly in Germany, Denmark, England, the Netherlands, France and Japan). The usual source for buying ornamental fishes is the pet shop. However pet shops are tailored to the general request and only rarely offer such fishes for special interests; the offer them anyway; they are almost exclusively wild ones that are rarely in good condition. In case that the fishes are weakened by exhausting fishing and keeping conditions, an effective oodinium quarantine with 2-amino-5-nitrothiazol is recommended (the preparation for the treatment of the so-called “Lochkrankheit” is sold under trade names like “Hexa-Ex” or “Spirohexol”. It is also an extremely effective medicine against oodinium). The best is when you purchase your fishes directly from a breeder in Europe. Experienced breeders of licorice gouramis are the optimal address for good fishes. Here you normally get young, healthy and vigorous animals. Sometimes you have to pick them up by yourself, because the shipment of sensitive living fishes is always a risk. On the other hand especially licorice gouramis hold out well the transport in small boxes. The most dangerous factor is the cold. Most breeders of licorice gouramis joined the “team licorice gourami” which the author founded with the active assistance of Martin Hallmann about three years ago. Their major task is to play a part in maintaining the stocks of these fantastic fishes in the long term (see below “affix: information about the team licorice gourami (team Paro)”. If you are registered Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 here, you generally do not have any difficulties to get the Paros you would like to keep sooner or later. Since the team Paro features some nice successes. Before its foundation almost all licorice gouramis were again extinct within a few years, in spite of some considerable offspring. Now this is an absolute exception by means of a coordinated agreement on distribution, offspring and passing on. 5. The tank of licorice gouramis The ideal tank for licorice gouramis is smaller than one hundred litres. Tanks of 25 and 40 litres with a slightly streamed mat filter which take one to two pairs each are well appropriate. You only need a substrate as settlement for bacteria, a very thin layer is sufficient. Layers of leaves (washed autumn foliage, in particular leaves of oaks or beeches) are good as suppliers of humic substance, as cave labyrinth and as hidings for the young. One leaf of a sea almond tree per tank seems to be hygienically advantageous. In any case one small cave per pair is the centre of the tank. Material, colour and position seem to be less important. They willingly accept very small film tins which swim on the surface, but most of the caves are on the bottom: small caves of wood, stone or clay in different forms and colours. The caves should be placed well visible; for this purpose you should hold ready a torch. The fishes spawn in these caves; both partners try to collect the eggs which are heavier than water and fix them to the ceiling. They often gather a few bubbles in order to partially build a rudimentary bubble nest. Paros are fishes of the riparian undergrowth, they are in need of company and do not like any big light. Therefore it makes sense to structure the free water space with branches of moorkien wood and water plants. Shady floating plants (very good: Ceratopteris, but also others) are recommended as well as to darken the side panes. Another selection of plants is very limited because of the extreme water values and the lack of light. Above all Java moss and Java fern are suited but also single stalk plants and Cryptocoryne. Plant fertiliser and carbonic acid are out of place. Some small and calm companion fishes (e. g. species of Boraras) or prawns can convey safety to the Paros, but they also prevent the raising of young fishes. If you want to make this experience, you have to do without accompanying fauna. 6. The breeding of the young During the courtship, which is well worth seeing, the males shine resplendent in really magnificent colours; the females mostly become monochrome bright pale. They are chased away after spawning, but in the surroundings of the cave they are tolerated as guard outside the cave. The male looks after the eggs and the freshly hatched larvae during the first seven to ten days. The ceiling of the cave may not be so sloping that the attached clutch could slip out of the orifice. After becoming free swimming, which may sometimes take ten days, the tiny young Paros swarm out. Some adults have to learn in the course of some spawns that it is not a new kind of food; others seem to know it from the first time and so they let their offspring unmolested. Therefore hiding places are very important, namely on the bottom (e. g. layers of leaves) and on the water surface (floating plants). So, in a calm, strongly structured tank, offering many hiding places a few or even many young fishes have the possibility to grow up together. After one or two weeks of feeding with rotifers the young can get the smallest artemia nauplii. The small tanks basically constrain to discipline the feeding, also when feeding the adult fishes. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 A good maxim is to feed rather scarcely than a lot what helps to keep the water quality and – as it seems – the health of the fishes, too. This applies all the more when the young also grow up in the tank. Strong floating plants such as Ceratopteris are of a big hygienic value now. This plant helps to clearly reduce the danger of an overloading of the water by traces of food and products of metabolism. At these times it is proved to use filters and to regularly exchange parts of the water. Otherwise Paros are well to be kept in tanks without any filters. If larger groups of young fishes grow up (one clutch can contain between 15 and 60 (or more!) eggs) they later need a bigger tank. Paros need a long time until they reach their sexual maturity, mostly approximately 9 months. The males are often to be distinguished beforehand according to the colourful pattern of the unpaired fins. The dorsal fins of the females are often flatter and not so long on the tail; you see this difference relative early, too. There are always some young in the groups of young Paros which grow faster than others. They are not necessarily livelier or healthier. It is a question of natural spreading combining the advantages of the fast growth with the advantages of the slow growth. 7. Summary If you develop a routine in order to fulfil their needs, you get to know a new, very attractive form of the aquaristics with small tanks. They can also be arranged in a nice and different manner, too. They can easily be maintained, if you have solved the problems you have with the water and the food by yourself. In a certain way licorice gouramis are the ideal fishes for tanks, because they do not necessitate any technically large-scale constructions with a high consumption of water and energy. Their petiteness, their peace61 the stock of Malpulutta has been taken “by the way”; it seems not to be endangered at the moment. At the medium term it would certainly be meaningful to encounter more appropriate classifications from the systematic point of view. Most of the breeders can be contacted via the address of the group “Parosphromenus”; for this purpose please write an email to the author of this text who is the leader of this team: [email protected]. from the left Paroshromenus anjunganensis (Photo H. Linke) Paroshromenus tweediei (Photo G. Kopic) ful character, their interesting behaviour and their rich colouring emphasise the aesthetics of small and nice tanks with biological focus which are not dominated by a big display of equipment. The fact that they do not accept tap water and that they force us to feed them with live food will limit their large distribution. But they reward the necessary efforts with the special charm of the particular. It is worth to play a part in protecting their population. Many aquarists are learning today that small tanks can also be most attractive, after a phase of bigger and bigger tanks which are more ingenious from the technical point of view. In the meantime the one or other prefers to occupy various small tanks which are very differently arranged and without too much technical equipment, with several kinds of Paros instead of keeping a very big tank with a mixed population of medium-scale or big fishes and an immense technical display. Affix: Information about the team licorice gourami (“team Paro“) The aforementioned “team Paro” acts as team licorice gourami within the IGL as well. But the members also work closely together with other associations (e. g. the team labyrinth fishes/ European Anabantoid Club, the French CIL, or the Anabantoid Society of Great Britain), because there aren’t so many friends of licorice gouramis so that you could afford a split-up. Everybody who is interested can join this group free of charge notwithstanding his membership to other associations and so receive the information about Paros at irregular intervals. Since most breeders live in Germany, the “Paro Info” has been published in German by now, however with a short abstract of the topics in English. The group collects the stock according to species, variations and location forms in a very detailed way twice a year (in spring and in autumn, before the respective conference of the IGL); the evaluation will be distributed to the addresses of the group members by the “Paro Info”. Recently the hitherto last and especially extensive stock evaluation (in anonymous form) has been published to the first time: cf. P. Finke, The stock of licorice gouramis in our tanks in autumn 2008, in: Der Makropode 4/2008, p. 119 –128). On the exchanges at the conferences you can always buy some species of licorice gouramis, among them rare ones, too. The same applies to the meetings of the friendly associations. Aquarists who cannot get Paros somewhere else are well advised to participate in a conference of the IGL where he will find what he is looking for. As already mentioned 62 If you only would like to be added to the mail group of the “Paro info”, this is also recommended. Most members of the Paro team keep Paros themselves and most of them breed already the next generation, however the friends of Paros are welcome, too, if you do not have the possibility (interim, presently, currently) to keep these fishes, but if you want to take part in this communication network. In either case the group would very much appreciate it, if further friends of licorice gouramis joined them due to this publication. By now the work of the team has been extraordinarily successful: no species in our tanks has become extinct since their establishment, all described but missing species by now could be found and bred, most of the existing stocks of the different species can/could survive by offspring. Many unknown forms could be newly brought in and bred. But for the future it remains uncertain, if this good balance can really be held out at the long term. Also in future we are dependent on imports. Nearly one hundred active friends of licorice gouramis are still too few in either case to assure the preservation of the stocks which have been very much differentiated in the meantime in the long run; for this we need triple this number, then we will have a realistic chance. But there is a chance! Well: Let’s tackle it together! Everybody can help to preserve these nice little fishes! Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Team Ctenops/Spaerichthys/Parasphaerichthys/Luciocephalus Sphaerichthys vaillanti – the red chocolate gourami By Anke Binzenhöfer My first labyrinth fishes were chocolate gouramis and as it is with your first love…, they are still the fishes “of my dreams”. bling very much Sphaerichthys osphromenoides. Sometimes this species is considered as a subspecies of S. osphromenoides. Actually four species belong to the genus of Sphaerichthys in general: Sphaerichthys osphromenoides Canestrini, 1860, the most famous one of the chocolate gouramis. This species is full-sized with almost 6 cm. The animals which you find most frequently on the markets are brown like chocolate with beige bars. The borders of the fins are also inscribed with this light beige. The males most distinctly the dominate male, have longer caudal fins which can show a light reddish colour, too. It is possible that you may find numerous local variations which differ very much in detail with regard to their coloration. Sphaerichthys acrostoma Vierke, 1979 with a total length of more than 6 cm. The species is the biggest of this genus. The colour of their body is a very light brown. Dorsal, caudal and anal fin are bordered in a slightly light blue. The form of their head and body resembles Spaerichthys vaillanti. An aquarist who is a friend of mine described it as follows: “Actually it looks like a vaillanti whose colour has been forgotten”. It came from the black water areas in the southeast of Borneo. Sphaerichthys selatanensis Vierke, 1979 with nearly 5 cm, the smallest one of the genus resem- Sphaerichthys vaillanti Pellegrin, 1930, Oliver Perrin brought some photos of his journey to West Kalimantan for the first time in 1996. The fishes can also reach a size of almost 6 cm. They do not have a Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 back which is as high as the one of S. osphromenoides. Therefore they seem to have a body form which is a bit more long-drawn out. The coloration of the males is slightly brown, in the middle of the body appears a beige coloured stripe, the hollow is beige, too. You could also call it gold coloured. Dorsal and anal fins are spotted in beige brown and bordered with a light stripe. The caudal fins are nearly transparent. There is a dark line which runs from the peaky mouth through the eye to the operculum. However the real eye-catchers are the females. The black eyes are bordered by a red ring. The cross stripes on the body sparkle in purple red and emerald green, from the left Sphaerichthys acrostoma-male (Photo: F. Schäfer) Sphaerichthys acrostoma-female (Photo: F. Schäfer) Sphaerichthys acrostoma (Photo: O.M. Nann) 63 from the left Sphaerichthys selatanensis (Photo: F. Schäfer) Sphaerichthys selatanensis (Photo: H. Linke) Sphaerichthys osphromenoides (Photo: F. Schäfer) especially during the courtship display. The fins are also coloured through and bordered by a white line. The animals live in black water and in their waters of origin you find a pH value below 5 and a conductance far below one hundred micro siemens. By using a reverse osmosis system you extract the hardness from the tap water. Another option would be to use rain water. Since the pH value lies in the neutral range from the left Sphaerichthys osphromenoides from Jambi (Photo: F. Schäfer) Sphaerichthys osphromenoides from Malaysia (Photo: F. Schäfer) Sphaerichthys vaillanti (Photo: A. Binzenhöfer) with these methods, the pH of the water should still be reduced, for example by means of appropriate peat. A further possibility would be to use a demineraliser changing cat ions against hydrogen ions and anions against sodium ions. Then you have water with a conductance below 10 micro siemens and a pH value around 4.3. About four years ago I discovered some photos of chocolate gouramis in the internet and I knew at once: I must have them! Then I got hold of a special edition about labyrinth fishes with an article by Klaus Weißenberg “Chocolate gouramis … nice and difficult?” the name of the author did not tell me anything in those days, but the article confirmed my wish to possess these special fishes. In May 2006 the time had come. After endless enquiries, telephone calls and emails six Spharerichthys vaillanti moved into my house. The animals were six months old at that time and they had the typical coloration of young fishes, beige brown patterned with light cross stripes. It had not yet been possible to differentiate their sexes. 64 The small vaillantis moved into a tank measuring 1.20 x 0.40 x 0.35 m which had expressly been constructed for them. Light sand served as substrate. Herewith I made good experiences in other tanks, particularly in order to protect the substrate from rotting. This is the same reason why I always put some Malaysian livebearing snails into my tanks. The tank was well structured by a big filigree root provided with anubias and java moss forming shelter and hiding places at the same time. A vallisneria and java fern have survived until today, in spite of the soft acid water values. Floating plants offer security to the chocolate gouramis from above, but complicate the feeding with drosophila, a species of fruit fly with stumped wings. Since Sphaerichtys vaillanti need soft and acid black water for their well-being and their reproduction I use an ionic exchanger system. I utilize the water that I then obtain to change the water without blending it. In order to give the water the dark brown colour, you can use leaves of native beeches Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 or oaks, alder cones or the leaves of exotic sea almond trees. The temperature in the tank is 25 degrees C. At the beginning the six small vaillantis were very shy. They hid in the rear corner of the tank - pale and in shock coloration (the front side of the body in light beige, the backside of the body in dark brown). However this behaviour quickly abated and then they curiously swam across their new kingdom always looking for food. Their eyes were always moving in order to not miss anything and as soon as they had found something to eat they picked it with their pointed tubular mouth. I fed them once or twice a dayas they clearly preferred live food. They especially loved artemia nauplii, grindal worms, black and glass worms as well as drosophila, but they also did not despise granules. Initially I was surprised at the quantity these seemingly quite slim and delicate animals could demolish. After a while it turned out that I had one male and five females swimming in my tank which worried me in some respect, since I had heard about the aggression within the species, most notably among the females. To my surprise the fishes amazingly came to a very good arrangement with each other. A pair was quickly found which stayed together from then onwards. As far as I know the male spawned only with “its” female. Even when I could never observe the spawning by myself, because it seems that it always took place in the late evening or in the early morning, the pair formed a solid unity. The other females were on their way in a loose combined system. They were not allowed to come too close to the male and quarrelled among each other again and again, mutually picking and pushing against the middle of their bodies, which however never led to any injuries. In January 2007, thus one year old, one morning I detected the male with a thick throat sac under dense leaves under the water surface – strongly guarded by its female. Within the following days it stayed somewhere in the plant thicket most of the time, it did not eat anything and moved the offspring in its mouth with constantly repeating chewing movements. The female was mostly at its side and emerged only shortly for food whereas it ate quite a little. I admit that I quite scantly fed at that time in order to not lead the carrying male into temptation. It bravely held out to the end and after 20 exciting days, I seized the opportunity to take it out when it showed itself in the front part of the tank. In a 30s tank without any substrate with some leaves of sea almond trees and water of the big tank it started to spit out bit by bit its young on the 21st day of the mouth breeding. This dragged on for two days, at the end there were 42 young fishes with a size of nearly 3 - 4 mm in my tank. Immediately they took fresh artemia nauplii. I put the father back into the big tank after it let out the last young, because I did not want to risk that it looked upon them as a prey. Concerning a later brood I was not quick enough and so I had to observe how fast it was after its young when it had let out the last one – Not a chance to prohibit feeding! The small vaillantis are divided in two colours during the first weeks, similarly to the shock coloration, front light, back dark and the fins completely transparent. I kept them in small 10 litre breed- Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 from the left Sphaerichthys vaillanti-pair (Photo: O. Perrin) Jungfische von S. vaillanti (Photo: A. Binzenhöfer) ing tanks without substrate, filtered by air lifters. One or two small Malaysian trumpet snails recycled the remaining food. However the bottom should daily be aspirated by a thin tub. Every day I changed the water of the tank. I took half of the water of the parents’ tank and filled it up with fresh water. From the beginning the young fishes took artemia nauplii, micro worms and very small moina or Cyclops. Small black worms (if available) are a very good food for the young, too. If you regularly pay attention to a good feeding and a consequently good water quality, the breeding does not cause any problems. Meanwhile Sphaerichtys vaillanti swim in all stages of life and sizes in my tanks. I could give many young fishes to fanciers of these wonderful, fascinating fishes and my conclusions after almost three years with my “strawberry chocos”…, a labyrinth fish which is not that unpretentious but marvellous and interesting! Acknowledgements I would like to thank so much Frank Schäfer for the photos. 65 The young of S. vaillanti (all photos: A. Binzenhöfer) Literature Schäfer, F. 2008. Farbvarianten beim Schokoladengurami. Aquaristik Fachmagazin Nr.199, 40(1): 38-41. Weissenberg, K. 2005. Schokoladenguramis - schön und schwierig? Aquaristik aktuell Sonderheft: 48-55. Translated by Carmen Scharschmidt Jacqueline Faust www.weichwasserfische.de Workgroup Anabas/Ctenopoma/Microctenopoma/Sandelia Observations regarding gender characteristics of Dwarf Bushfish, Bushfish and Kurper bushfish By Jürgen Schmidt (Weißwasser) I‘ve been tied to the aquariumhobby since I was 7. At that time I was given my first tank by my father, who himself has kept fish since his childhood years. Naturally pretty soon gouramies were also swimming in this tank, and ever since that time Labyrint fish have always been part of my permanent fish stock. About 30 years ago I was able to admire the first Bush fish I ever saw at an aquarium friend‘s house. He got them through mediation by the former Central Group (ZAG) labyrinth fish of the GDR. One year later I was able to take care of the first Ctenopoma in my own tanks, but sadly attempts to breed them remained futile in the first years. Still I was fascinated by the somewhat different behaviour of this group of fish, and this has never changed to the present 66 day. After the German reunification I had better options to obtain species that were new to me from the family of Climbing fishes. But because there were always difficulties with importing specific African ornamental fishes, and Bush fish only came to Europe as by-catch fish, it remained difficult to obtain these species and that probably won‘t change in the fture. Through years of effort Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 however meanwhile my small fishroom in the basement is populated with very different Ctenopoma, Microctenopoma and by Sandelia. Sadly in literature and on the internet one can hardly find any information on this group of fishes. Only pathes of information on the keeping and breeding of these species is described, and in my experience the information is highly dubious. With these conditions, especially the determination of the gender, particularly in Ctenopoma, is still a „closed book“. So at this point I will elaborate on the gender characteristics of bush fish that I have made through years of observation. Let us first turn to the , with a maximum of 8 cm body length relatively small, bubblenesting Microctenopoma Here are a few gender-specific references to the best-known species of this group of fish: Microctenopoma ansorgii: Already in juveniles with a body length of less than 2 cm one can already observe juvenile males displaying with very intense colors. In adult M. ansorgii it is in general really easy to determine the gender. Males have elongated dorsal and anal fins and are more intensely colored while displaying and courting. Females on the other hand can almost always be identified by their swollen abdomen. Still even experienced Bush fish keepers have problems to determine the gender , even in fully grown fish. This is caused by the fact that in every spawn males with shorter fins and less color occur. On top of that very colorful females also occur. Approximately two years ago “ Microctenopoma ansorgii was imported by Aquariu Glaser, who differed from the fish known until now, by a few different characteristics. The overall appearance of these fish was bigger and stronger when compared to the slim fish known until then. Also there are differences in the coloration. Especially in the males the following can be observed: in the normal coloration the transverse bars are clearly visible and ordened, meaning that they do not branch like in the ansorgii we know. When the fish display their mating colors, they completely loose the bands on their body and instead of that display a uniform orange/brown. Only the fins are still clearly banded similar to the form we already know. Overall this concerns a coloration that is very unusual to Bush fish experts. Microctenopoma fasciolatum: Regarding the gender determination this is more a „classical“Labyrint fish. Males are a little bit bigger, with elongated dorsal and anal fins, and are more colorful.Fully grown females on the other hand are recognizable by their continuously swollen abdomen. Based on the above mentioned characteristics it is easy to determine the early precocious males in a group of juveniles. However, other males do not show any of these characteristics prior to reaching the almost adult stage. This makes it hard to Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 balance when purchasing juvenile fish, only when the animals are fully grown it‘s often seen that far more males were purchased than females. In female Mct. fasciolatum frequently a light gray longitudinal band can be observed, which extends over the middle of the body from the head to the caudal fin. Especially females that are ready to mate show this characteristic very clearly. Still this cannot be used as a distinctive feature for the gender, as males sometimes also show this longitudinal stripe during normal coloration. Sometimes very colorful females can be seen, especially in half grown fish, who rival amongst eachother and are easily mistaken for males when only examining the fish superficially. Depending on the mood now and then one can see beautifully light-blue colored males, but I won‘t discuss that further at this point. Microctenopoma damasi: These animals are difficult to distinguish as juveniles, and also in adult fish one has to look closely to be able to recognize the gender characteristics. Females have a more pointy head, and a more developed stom- from the left Microctenopoma fasciolatumfemale Microctenopoma fasciolatum-male (Both pictures: J. Schmidt, Weißwasser) Microctenopoma damasi-male (Picture: H. Hensel/J. Schmidt, Weißwasser) 67 Ctenopoma petherici during spawning (Picture: J. Schmidt, Weißwasser) Ctenopoma ocellatum-pair (Picture: H. Hensel/J. Schmidt, Weißwasser) ach. Males are a bit larger, leaner and when they are in the mood display intense bright/darkblue colors. Besides that in elder males the frontal regions appear remarkablt round. Weibchen sind hier spitzköpfiger, mit stärkerer Bauchgegend. Männchen sind etwas größer, wirken schlanker und sind in Stimmung intensiver hell-/ dunkelblau gefärbt. Außerdem erscheint bei zahlreichen älteren Männchen die Stirngegend auffallend rund. Some Bushfish loving friends pointed out to me that there are some different color forms of Microctenopoma damasi from different regions. Microctenopoma nanum: These fish too can only be distinguished from one another when almost fully grown. Males have somewhat elongated fins and displat brighter colors especially when breeding or displaying, females on the other hand are a little bit smaller with a more developed stomach.. As discussed at M. fasciolatum female M. nanum can also display, depending on mood, a longitudinal stripe. Supposedly there are 68 many different forms of M. nanum which sometimes strongly differ from other forms, from different origins. To discuss these fish in more detail would require more comparative data and personal experience, which at the moment is unavailable. Other Microctenopoma-species like M. congicum, M. intermedium etc.. (provided these are separate species) are comparable in gender characteristics to M. fasciolatum or M. nanum. Let us now look at the Ctenopoma-species, a group of bushfish, where there is even less knowledge on the keeping and breeding as in Microctenopoma. Ctenopoma are fish, which lay eggs in open water and with a body length of twelve to 20 cm are significantly larger than the species from the previously described group of fish. If one has the possibility to purchase such fish at the dealer (which is very rarely the case), the desire to obtain a gender parity is immediately disposed of as completely impossible. Even aquarists that worked with the genus Ctenopoma for prolonged periods give mostly only body fullness as information, if any, on gender differences in fully grown adults. Basically, I can confirm this, but I must point out that this requires, of course, the proper care and feeding over a long period of time. Even if these conditions are met, gender determination is only possible in a few individual animals and also fraught with many question marks. In addition to this rather vague method to determining the gender in Ctenopoma species there is another that seems more promising. The available literature in this context repeatedly mentions the so-called spike fields in the area of the eyes and tail. For some years I have used these spike fields successfully to determine sex in large Ctenopoma species. The spike fileds, which are in a dense crescent shape under the Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 eyes of male animals, can be felt easily with fingertips. To do so it is of course necessary to remove the respective fish from the aquarium for sex determination. When this is done with sufficient caution this does in general not result in damage to these rather robust Ctenopomas. Now slowly go with your fingertips from the gills towards the eye. If it‘s a male one clearly notices that the fingers stick to these thorny spike fields. Females have usually no, or sometimes very much smaller thorns as compared to males. They can hardly be felt. This method of determining the gender can be used in fish that are 8 cm or longer. The older and the bigger the fish are, the more clearly these secondary gender characteristics become apparent. Frequently Ctenopoma-Males get entangled into the net with their spike fields when catching them. In some species (for example. C. acutirostre or C. ocellatum) the spike fields behind the eye can easily be seen when looking carefully, so the fish can be spared the unnecesary stress. Using the „feeling-method“ one can certainly identify C. kingsleyae and C. petherici (also C. argentoventer and C. breviventrale, if these are valid species). A little bit more difficult, butwith a little practise also do-able is the gender detrmination in Ctenopoma weeksii. The prevalence of spike fields in the caudal fin base I was unable to Easily recognizable spike fields in a male Ctenopoma kingsleyae. The arrow shows the direction in which one should feel when checking the sexes.. In female Ctenopoma kingsleyae the spike fileds are mostly much more unnoticeable as compared to males, or completely non existent. In this male of Ctenopoma ocellatum the spike field can clearly be recognized as a half crescent behind the the eye. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 69 Here I place for example C. multispinis, C. pellegrinii or t. nigropannosum. Of this group sadly I only keep C. pellegrinii . In this fish it is really hard to distinguish the genders, even in fully gron specimens, since it is only possible to determine that based on the larger bellies in females. Ofcourse this requires optimal feeding of the entire group of fish. Male Ctenopoma acutirostre with clearly visible spike fields. The arrow shows the direction in which one should feel when checking the sexes.. The in the literature frequently referenced occurence of spike fields in male animals behind the eyes and in this group especially in the base of the caudal fin I cannot confirm. Despite detailed examinations I could never establish the existence of spike fileds in C. pellegrinii. Still I did manage to make another very interesting observation. During dispay between male specimens the fish extend their throat sacks significantly. When this occurs it appears as if one is looking at mouthbreeders(like for example mouthbreeding Betta). A few final observations on the free-spawning species Busch, which will not help in sex determination, but which I still would like to raise. In this female Ctenopoma acutirostre the spike field is minimal and can hardly be observed with the bare eye. establish in all of the before discussed Ctenopoma-species. Being the smallest of the Ctenopoma species, C. muriei is somewhat special. In these bushfish I was unable to detect spike fields uptill now. But despite that determining the sex is really easy in adult C. muriei, since females are much rounder and with 12 cm become significantly bigger as the males with a maximum size of 8 cm. A Ctenopoma-Group, which strongly resmbles Anabas, is the elongated group( sometimes referred to as the cigar group). 70 A very interesting color scheme can be observed frequently in adult Ctenopoma kingsleyae during courtship and display. The whole body turns remarkably bright gray. All scales seem strongly black-rimmed - an interesting overall appearance, which appears more intense in older and larger fish. According to my observations both sexes so recolor when in the mood. After a water change, but also when the fish are in “mood for love” one can frequently observe in large bush fish clearly scarlet colored points at the base of the pectoral fins. This phenomenon is known also from commercial freshwater fishing. The Siberian Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) also colors ,in stressful situations, to blood-red. For some years I have made in different species of Ctenopoma males which are ready to mate an interesting observation. They show a clearly visible point / spot right at the foot tip of the mandible. This is reminiscent of a newly healing injury. But why does this occurs in this phase and why only in male animals? These and some other questions can possibly only, if ever, be addressed in the next few years, only by continuously observing these, rather complicated and difficult to spawn fish. A pair of the species Sandelia capensis: male (Foto: J. Schmidt; Weißwasser) Finally, some information about the third group of bush fish, on the genus Sandelia (Cape curpers: I have been working for some time with fish of the species Sandelia capensis. Some of the fish I obtained at the autumn meeting of the IGL in 2007 in Hamburg. These are probably the remnants of a population that has been passed on for several years within Europe, from fish friend to fish friend friend. In January 2008 I managed to breed them. Since then, I had ample opportunity to occupy myself with the sex determination in these fish. In Cape curpers the males are more slender, with a stronger and larger head part. Females on the other hand are more full-bodied and resemble a little bit livebearer females when they are about to give. The males are also slightly larger than the females. These differences are already easily observed in adolescent animals. Male Sandelia capensis frequently show during display or when ready to mate a deep black or black stripes in the head and body regions. Females simply observe the behavior from a distance and as bystanders almost always show a brighter color scheme. Sandelia capensis female Only during actual spawning the female also shows this strong dark color. These are observations that I could make in half-grown animals when kept in entirely different keeping conditions. Due to the conservation policy export of Cape curpers from South Africa is strictly prohibited. It Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 (Foto: J. Schmidt, Weißwasser) is therfore up to us aquarists, to maintain a population of Sandelia capensis outside it‘s natural range. I hope in the future still a few more labyrint fish friends will occupy themselves with this highly interesting family of fish the climbing perches. 71 Working group Snakeheads – Channa Channa melasoma – Breeding, Exotics and the IGL By Christian Kanele You are now reading the first existing written report on the breeding of the snakehead Channa melasoma. Ah, ok, you might think. And why is this in the special issue of 2009? Well, in connection with the publication of this article I’m also thinking about the role played by the co-operation within the IGL, which enabled in the end a successful breeding. Read the report and tell me if you also know the passion they have with their fish and also with the IGL. „Channa melasoma? – No idea, never seen“ Channa melasoma is a snakehead, which is rarely to never found in aquaria. The only specimens, which I heard existed prior to my own possession of these fishes were a pair of Frank Schäfer – for which I presume, he didn‘t obtain them from the local fish store at the corner, but had to go to some more trouble. The previous images, which I gathered over the years, amounted to a lot of images of Channa striata. The IGL and her crazy people The IGL was never a mainstream aqaurist community. This is certainly caused by the fact that labyrinth fish, apart from a very few exceptions, are no mainstream aquarium fish. The exiting part of this marginality of the aquarium scene is in my opinion, that there are many „Exotics“ , who will muster the energy for Channa melasoma after Bleeker 72 new things and bring about even more like minded exotics. So far my view on the IGL, now back to the fishes. When in 2006 my highly esteemed association collegue and Channaholic Exotic Pascal Antler had the possibility to obtain C. melasoma from Thailand, another wave of the above described excitement occurred within the Channa-WG . „Palle“ also managed to find a pair out of the 6 fish received and to breed C. melasoma for the very first time. I contend that „Palle“ is the all time best Channa breeder in the whole world. That‘s the second thing I love about the IGL, although she ekes out a marginal existence, it has gathered a lot of high-profile exponents of the labyrinth fish guild. Unfortunately, the couple died some time after spawning, so that only a few observations could be made by him. The few observations and experiences, which he shared with us by word of mouth (at that time without the films produced by him for that purpose) at a Channa-WG meeting. This article would not have been possible without the unselfish cooperation within the Channa-WG or the IGL. Since I am better at writing than at making photos, “Palle” contributed his photos to my words for your reading pleasure. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Channa melasoma-breeding: Episode one Since this type of fish reach a size of 30–35 cm, they require considerably more space than eg dwarf snakeheads, such as C. gachua. The first problem in the breeding of snakehead fish is to recognize the gender differences and the creation (or rather, the “coming together”) of a pair. “Palle” gave me at two different IGL meetings (Autumn 2006 and Spring Meeting 2007) one of the C. melasoma-animals he obtained to take to Switzerland. The requirements of the animals regarding tank size, and the sooner or later occurring rivalry, for example during a “coming together” of a couple, who afterwards claim appropriate space make the Channakeeping a hobby that requires a certain environment of Channaholics. The Channa-workgroup provides just such an environment. Within the group, as well as within the IGL, the animals are exchanged or transferred, usually even without monetary compensation, because it concerns primarily the animals and the progress in breeding. First one fish occupied (themale, which I received at the second meeting and from which no-one knew the sex) the 450-liter tank (1,5 m long) and after a few weeks started to calculate, that the tank was actually large enough and offered enough hiding places to house two C. melasoma . Tubes, giant roots, large plants were present. I thought I could dare to place the two animals together. Well, (the tank novice, as it later turned out, the female) disappeared after a brief exchange of blows in one of the many hiding places. Today we claim that the sexual differentiation in C. melasoma in adult animals is visible looking at the different head shape. The male has a much broader head, even if not wider between the eyes and gill covers, such as in for example C gachua and also others. In addition to that, the male shows a marbled black and white throat coloration, especially during the spawning season – was it always visible. Yes, but genuine joy did not occur, because there was neither the typical consequence of a notpair: Channa-rescue of an animal after a fight, nor was there a rapprochement between the two. Pair or notpair, that was the question. Should I call it a disappointment that I took the opportunity to adopt three beautiful adult Trichopodus microlepis into asylum, since they fit beautifully in the great quiet tank without fear of being attacked by the Channa. In fact, it remained after the deployment of the three new residents as quiet as before. The T. microlepis generated even more action and so the whole tank unopposed by the uncertain much larger Channa-male, who at the time was a length of about 25 cm. That was summer 2007. In the following months I was busy with my new job in Bern, which added 3 hours daily commuting. The room under the roof, where the tank stood, was now occupied by an au-pair girl , so I could spend very little time observing the fish, when I got home at night. Only when passing by it was easy to see the light T. microlepis swimming. This was more difficult with the C. melasoma. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 from the left Mandible muster in Channa melasoma During transfer – size comparison (both pictures: C. Kanele) Peacefully September 2007 came to an end. As I walked past the tank one weekend I was startled, when I saw three very battered T. microlepis, which previously had not even had a crooked scale. For one of them it was already too late: „Oh no, what happened here“! I became suspicious (or hopeful) that this was somehow related to the C. melasoma. And indeed. In a corner, well separated by a root, as planned when I designed the tank, stood a C. melasoma under a school of newly hatched fish (in hindsight they must have been 2-3 days old). I was dumbstruck and electrified at the same time (For this you need to know, that breeding free spawning Channa, as opposed to mouthbreeding ones, only in recent years has shown better results). But the first failures presented themselves. Caring for the fry appeared to be a problem for me. On the one hand this was caused by time on the other hand by a lack of experience. This and three other spawns (September 2007 – December 2007) starved to death shortly after using up their yolk sac. 73 Channa melasoma fry (both pictures: C. Kanele) Channa melasoma-breeding: Episode two I will report on the now following successful breeding attempts in diary form. Oh, yes, before I forget, just a few comments on water values. In general labyrinth fish and especially snakeheads do not require specific waterconditions. Which is also what I do. I use our medium hard tap water and the water temperature ranged from 25 °C to 28 °C, depending on the season. Water changes were carried out infrequently. So that is all I can say on this subject. In other words, this isn‘t the important part for breeding Channa‘s. The diary begins with the second successful breeding. At this time the first brood is two weeks old. Since the first brood in September, I have improved the Artemia supply, and found a source for live Cyclops, and as such ensured a proper food supply. The au pair girl I have introduced to the suction and feeding of brine shrimp, so that the feeding was guaranteed 2 to 3 times per day. Artemia / Cyclops can be fed directly after the the yolk sac is used up. Week: 17.03.08 – 22.03.08 Saturday or Sunday: During the feeding of the fry I saw that the pair had spawned a second time. This occurred like all previous times in the usual place (behind the large roots) in the corner. A rough estimate of the total number of eggs is 300.. M. guards the eggs, i.e. is below the raft. F. is in the other half of the tank. She is never involved in the guarding of the brood, which means that C. melasoma is no exception, it is a Father family. The fry is also located in the other half of the tank and is either hidden between floating plants or located just above the bottom looking for food. They stay in a loose group, but becomes a really tight group for example during feeding in the vicinity of „the place to be“. The female has been swimming approximately 3 to 4 weeks now with a torn caudal, dorsal and anal fins and she‘s always hungry. Sometimes some of the larger fry „make a mistake“ in which spawn they belong, and the father makes an almost endearing attempt to drive them away, biting in the water and by expelling air from the labyrinth creating loud „threats“. He doesn‘t really succeed in driving away these juveniles from the eggs, and they eat away the eggs. Monday: The brood starts to hatch. One can see little tails dangling from the eggs. Tuesday: The fry have hatched completely and are hanging from the surface, belly up. Size ca. 2-3 mm. Wednesday: fish have turned 74 over and are currently lying like a raft on the surface. Color: black. Start with feeding. There are no juveniles on the hunt for younger siblings. F. leaves the brood in peace. Thursday: Fish are free swimming in a school at the same location as always. Daily feeding. No more hunting parties are observed. Prior to feeding the fry, the others, F. and the older siblings, are fed. Based on the experience from the first breeding attempt, the Cyclops are no longer placed with a net in the tank, but given with a syringe along the glass. The M feels threatened or perceives threat to his brood by the net and “bites” at the surface in a way that a loud noise is generated (This repeated observation made the author believe that this is a defensive strategy). Friday: The juvenile fish of the 2nd spawn go to the bottom of the tank (water depth 50 cm) to search for food. Week: 24.03.08 – 30.03.08 The young develop in the beginning of the second week bright points in the two upper parts of the eyes. By the end of the week, they lightly show a longitudinal youth coloration: black on the top and bottom, beige, yellow gold along both sides of the body between the two black bands. M. “guards” the brood. W. stays in the distance, always interested in food. I removed for fear of predatory behavior the first brood for the most part. There remain approximately 10 to 20 animals in the tank, because they had hidden themselves very well and the effort involved in catching them, would have been tremendous (e.g.. dense floating vegetation). Week: 31.03.08 – 06.04.08 The fry develop the luminous dot between the eyes on the head. All fry now have the youth coloration. It is incredibly beautiful to see the dark colored fish with Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 only the luminous dot swim in the tank. Size of the fry is now approxiately 5 mm. The M. keeps „guarding“ the fry. The F. remains at a distance, always hungry. No hunting parties occur. The fry occupy the same corner as before at the other end of the tank. I feed the first brood and the female at the one end of the tank, and the male and the second brood on the other with chpped shrimp. The female and elder siblings no longer hunt the fry from the second brood (anymore). The M. doesn‘t react negatively towards his wife. When the male comes looking for food in the other corner, there are no conflicts or persecutions. Week: 07.04.08 – 13.04.08 Due to climatic changes, there are no more Cyclops, but only water fleas, which are much larger. The juveniles also eat the water fleas. Some of the water fleas are so large that the baby fish (from approximately 5 to 7 mm) that catches such a water flea is moved or „shaken“ by the flight attempts from the latter. The surface is covered with airbubbles from the fry. They are caused by the breathing of the young fish and appear to be very stable. Week: 14.04.08 – 18.04.08 A small proportion of juveniles (first and second brood) is twice as large as their siblings. The remaining juvenile fish of the first brood in the tank have smuggled themselves in between the fry of the second during feeding to grab the fed water fleas, but not to eat the much smaller siblings. The M is still the same place, as is F. As soon as I give a glass with water fleas or brine shrimp (in the rear corner), the M. is aroused by the movement of water, and patrols the spawn to looks after things. “ The M. has a permanently dark throat - in contrast to the female, which has a much lighter throat. I think I recognize a egg tube from W. too. I think the distance between the two jaws for F. is larger than in M. Week: 19.04.08 – 26.04.08 The gap in size has increased as compared to last week. The largest of the spawn is surely many times the length and size of the others. The largest fry is surely 1,25 – 1,5 cm , whereas a lot of the smaller ones are no larger than 0,5-0,7 cm. I think the basis for the huge difference (taking the first brood as a comparison) is the change in food. Caused by the extremely large water fleas, the availability of food for the fry will be scarce, and for the few larger fish it is an Eldorado. The group of fry (second spawn), who occupied up until now a single spot, temporarily dissolves and they swim in the entire tank, near the surface as well as in the vicinity of the bottom. The fry of the first and the second spawn mingle in the middle of the tank. After many observations and based on the constant number of small fish of the second brood, I can say now that there were no cannibalistic attacks by the older fish on the younger. I repeatedly observed the older fish attack and swallow water fleas and not the smaller siblings. The oldest fry show „Respect“ for the parents, where also the parents do not regard the bigger fry as food. The M. swims around this week with a very intense (darker) colored throat. I see a correlation with the tattered unpaired Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 from the left Juveniles with luminous dot Juveniles (both pictures: C. Kanele) fins of the female. During the first spawn, I could observe this already, and I would not be surprised if pretty soon again a new spawn would occur. Week: 27.04.08 – 04.05.08 I was away from home from Friday till Sunday. Early Friday afternoon I fed the fish extremely well again, to prevent notorious hunger outages. When I returned Sunday evening and looked inside the tank, I found the fry of the second spawn in the usual corner near the surface – all with stuffed bellies. I was surpised. But when looking more closely it was replaced by an even bigger surprise. The juveniles remained at te surface attrackted by the eggs of a new spawn that were just hatching. The seventh since September! The tail movement occurs two days after spawning. Die Bewegung des Schwanzes zeigt sich zwei Tage nach dem Ablaichen. The brood besieged the spawn site. With that my suspicions that I had a week before in relation to a new spawn were confirmed. That the fish always spawn on Fridays is an observation that I would like to state here, but I do not want to indulge in further speculation here. On Monday the fish had hatched. All of them were on teir backs in the raft. They still had a yolk sac, which could clearly be seen. 75 torn fins is found in a corner of the tank. Her waist circumference is significantly decreased. The M. is in the other corner, but no longer in the corner where the spawns occurred, he still has a dark throat. I can change the filter nozzle in the tank without the danger of attack. The fry of both spawns swim together, without any harm done, despite the big differences in size. Week: 02.06.08 – 08.06 .08 The larger animals of the second brood lose their juvenile plumage, the longitudinal strips. They are uniformly brown, and now show an ocellus in the dorsal, which at a size of about 10 to 12 cm disappears again. It is not the age but the size that determines the color. I was able to observe this due to the parallel breeds. And how is everything today? Where the tail was still transparent at the moment of hatching, now they were dark grey. Tuesday the fish turned from their backs to their bellies and were swimming in a group. The first Artemia addition was not disdained. . Wednesday the new brood was swimming top to bottom. The second brood I fed really well to prevent them from eating the new fry. In fact, I could see no more attacks. But the oldest fry from the first spawn, who were attrackted by the fed water fleas were strongly driven away by the father. On closer inspection, the first signs of the lighter longitudinal stripes could be detected. On Friday, the picture changed again abruptly. Both the father and the second and third brood had disappeared from the traditional corner. I found the brood scattered in the tank. The father was suddenly no longer interested in his paternity. This meant that the third brood disappeared Saturday. The older brood had fat bellies on a Saturday night, so that the suspicion fell on them. On Saturday evening, the second brood, as well as the father, arrived back in the usual area. I have the impression that the younger ones have not found the road back. Week: 04.05.08 – 11.05.08 There are very distinct differences in size among the fry. The largest is 3 times as large as the smallest. White mosquito larvae were fed. Week: 12.05.08 – 19.05.08 No events. Week: 20.05.08 – 26.05.08 The fry of the first batch show a dark edge on the unpaired fins, so now the fish have four dark logitudinal bands and in the middle a red-golden stripe. Both generations of fry form a single group. The M. has given up on his paternal duties, but still sows a mottled throat. F. is pretty trashed. Week: 27.05.08 – 01.06 .08 The constellation of the family has changed. The F. with her 76 Actually, there is not much more to report since then . The rearing was very easy, the fish are always greedy, and everything else did not bother them. Today (January 2009) the situation is that there are still some fry together with the father in the tank. The female I had removed after some time, because se always looked disheveled, and I was afraid that, as happened in “Palle”‘s case, it would end with the death of the female. “Palle” told me recently that his male paired with one of his daughters, and founded a new family. I still do not know when I will re-unite the two again. On that, I will write another time, but I hope it will be before the next special issue of the Makropode. And what do the “channaholischen” exotics of the IGL do? They will meet for one weekend in November 2009 in Meppel, guest at our now-still President Auke de Jong. Let’s see which wave of excitement of this European meeting will bring. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Workgroup Badis – Badis/Dario They are called Badis badis – the „blue“fish of the genus of Badis and Dario By Karl-Heinz Roßmann Strictly speaking they are still called Badis badis and they are also really nice blue, some forms anyway. Since the revision of the genus by Kullander and Britz, however, no stone was left unturned in the genus Badis. From a species with some subspecies, now there are fifteen (new) described species and several forms have not yet been described yet, of which some are surely also valid species. Here I will attempt an inventory of species and undescribed forms that are reasonably available to aquarists. That is, I will limit myself to the forms that I’ve cared for and bred myself. For further reading I recommend the article by Stephan van der Voort in the Amazonas and of course the revision of Kullander and Britz. Lets start with the Genus Badis. The fish can, with the exception of two or three eccentics, from an aquarist point of view be treated equally. With tem it is a bit like Malawi cichlids, they all look very different, but they all behave the same and can ofcourse be treated similar in aquariums. Contrary to Malawi Cichlids they are not boring. The requirements, posed by Badis-species, are not high. Watervalues are not important. Watertemperature can be between 22 and 26 °C, where the northern species such as B. badis and B. corycaeus can also be kept cooler, without demanding a really cold period. For breeding these species the tempearture sould be above 22 °C. What really makes the care and breeding of Badis stand or fall, is the feeding. The fish will not accept dry food and can also not be kept in a good condition when fed solely on frozen food. Food, which does not move, is not taken in sufficient quantity because of insufficient feeding motivation, and can only be used to overcome periods when no live food is available. Luckily freshly hatched artemia and older artemia are eaten avidly by all Badis, including the largest, and well tolerated. Badis can be kept together with other fish. Because of their feeding requirements and their feeding habits, they are slow and picky, this should be done with caution. Voracious eaters such as Poeciliids or barbs that inhabit te lower regions, will not leave the Badis any food to eat. Fishes that occupy the bottom of the tank with territorial behaviour are not suitable as sidefish, since the Badis will be snowed under by them. The best experience I have is with surface oriented Killies, for example the pikes that inhabit the same Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 natuaral habitat of te genus Aplocheilus or the livebearing Halfbeaks of the genus Dermogenys. They will not interfere with the bottom oriented Badis. So is there always something to see in the aquarium whenever the Badis play “empty aquarium.” again. A frequently asked question from people looking at my Badis tanks is: „Nice tank, but why don‘t you keep some fish in it“? Badis need places to hide, the females not so much but especially the males. These extreme cavespawners cannot be bred without dark and narrow shelters and the males will not display, without the posession of a cave, it‘s most beautiful colors. The genders are easily distinguisable in fully grown fish which show colors. The males show different splendid colors depending on the species. The females are brownish with dark transverse bands and are usually only half as large. More problematic is gender distinction in juveniles. Here the larger fish, even in groups that are still small, are the males. The most reliable difference is the body shape, when well-fed females have round bellies, while male bellies are sligtly concave, even when well fed. Badis are relatively easy to breed. They have no specific 77 from the left Badis badis – Fighting Male (Picture: K.-H. Roßmann) B. badis-male in the spawning cave (Picture: D. Murdoch) Badis badis-Male in normal coloration (Picture: F. Schäfer) water requirements, extremes should still be avoided, and the water should- naturally- be clean. Badis will also spawn in community tanks, as long as they are not disturbed in their breeding tubes. The male defends a small area around the cave, predominantly against females not ready to breed and other males looking for a territorium. Fish from other species are ignored, as long as they do not try to enter the cave. The courtship, when one can call it that, is very strange. The male occupies a cave, shows it‘s most radiant colors and is hardly ever visible. Especially the females are completely ignored, and only if they try to approach the cave, vigorously chased away. The only thing which remotely resembles courtship, is, that the male starts, long before an actual spawn occurs, to handle the breeding location as if a spawn had already occurred. Still at that moment there seems to be nothing of interest for the girls, as such a newly minted homeowner‘s only reaktion to any approach is to appear as a jack-out-of-a-box and to chase them away. Despite of that the females stand in line for as long as necessary, until the first is graciously allowed to spawn in the cave, and then the second and the third, or even all at once. That naturally results in fighting and therefore it is recommended to keep Badis in a group with more males than females. During the actual spawning the female is embraced by the male similar to Labyrinth fishes, and the eggs are glued to the wall of the cave, while the entwined pair slides along. After the laying of the eggs the female leaves the cave, but returns for as many times as necessary, to lay all of her eggs. After that she is not involved any more in the parental care. The male can spawn with several females, so that the eggs on the cave wall may contain spawns of different levels of development. The fry hatch in three days and remain anchored to the cave wall for three more days with their sticky heads, guarded and intensively fanned by the male. After that they enter the free swimming stage and leave the cave and then the adults stop looking after them. Because adult Badis, albeit some exceptions (more on that later), do not eat the fry, the rearing of the young can be done in the aquarium with the parents. Young Badis can eat freshly atched artemia naupli, so raising the young does not pose a problem. For a labor intensive, lowloss spawn I rinse the eggs or the not yet free swimming fry using a laboratory spray bottle to remove them from the cave and transfer them to a breeding tank. Eggs not yet developed I transfer into 78 a plastic tray to hatch. That can be done in two to three centimeters of water without aeration. Badis eggs are very resistant to fungal attacks. When rearing the fry, only cleanliness should be cared for. Because young Badis always reside on a substrate, and only leave the subtrate using small jumps to feed, the bottom of the tank needs to be kept extremely clean and the fish should have the possibility to leave the bottom. For that purpose I use a handful of Javamos. Badis-Breed is very vulnerable to nitrite and nitrate. But this is no reason to run around with measuring sets all the time. Whenever young Badis start to turn dark, it‘s time for a waterchange, otherwise deaths will occur. Before I start with the description of the Badis species, the question arises where to obtain these fish at all. In the normal aquarium store Badis badis is offered only infrequently. Most of these fishes come from private breeders or from commercial farms from the Czech Republic. Sometimes wildcaught fish from the vicinity of Calcutta are sold, but the aquarium strains from the Czech Republic are more colorfull and less prone to hiding. Here the decades of domestication become apparent. All other species can only be obtained via an importer or cannot be obtained at all. Which of course means that rarities like B. siamensis or B. khwae should be preserved at all cost if they are ever available in aquaria. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 The family Badis The genus Badis is widely spread, from Pakistan in the west through Northern India, Nepal, Bangladesh and Birma up to Southern Thailand. The most western species and the most widely spread, is Badis badis (Hamilton, 1822), the classic and at the same time the only true blue in the family of the so-called blue badis. It inhabits the basin of the great rivers of North India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh, so the Indus, Ganges, Brahmaputra and Mahanadi river. It does not occur in South India,. Here it is a very common fish that lives in all sorts of standing or slowly flowing waters, and is even found in the city center of Calcutta. It is the predominant species of the Badis badis group in the genus, and possibly the only real species. Other species have been described as B. kanabos and B. chittagongis whose species description in the revision by Kullander and Britz to me is not good enough to be valid species. Another form that is not completely blue, it has many red-brown tones, is labelled sp. “Wahumiam river”. I think this form is also one of the many color morphs of B.badis. (Sorry, Stephan!). This Badisgroup is also recognizable from the females by the following characteristics: the second and third rays of the dorsal fin have a dark stain. Behind the gill cover is a black dot and the tail spot seen in all Badis, is exactly located on the center of the tail base. It can be hidden when in spawning coloration or in intensely colored fish by the last transverse dark band. Fully colored male B. badis are colored very dark or even black. Superimposed is a more or less intense blue gleam, although individuals of the old aquarium strain and fish from West Bengal and Bangladesh appear bright blue when in good condition. There are also strains with a slightly duller, blue to violet color, and also strains, as for example in Orissa, which look completely black. Badis kanabos Kullander & Britz, 2002 has been described from western Assam. According to the first description it differs from Badis badis by a more streamlined shape, always distinctly visible cross bands and a very conspicuous dorsal spot between the third and fifth dorsal fin ray. In the fish that I take currently take care of all of this applies. Even the females are easily distinguished from B. badis-female. Therefore I would like to call them with some reservations, at least Badis cf. kanabos . In the live coloration, the fish are always very clearly barred, even displaying males do not lose the stripes, in contrast to B. badis which then show an uniformly uniformly black base color. These fish most closely resemble B. badis from all species of this genus. Whether the separation is justified, I do not want to judge, a species is only a species, if a competent systematist pronounces them as such, and such I am not. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 from the left Badis corycaeus-female (Picture: K.-H. Roßmann) Badis cf. kanabos-female (Picture: K.-H. Roßmann) Badis ruber „Pathain“ (Picture: K.-H. Roßmann) Badis corycaeus Kullander & Britz, 2002 together with B. kyar, B. ferrarisi and B. sp. „Buxar“ forms the Badis corycaeusgroup, indicated by the following features. Dark first dorsal fin ray and post-opercular spot as in the Badis badis group, caudal spot centered, not obscured by the last crossbands, instead enclosed by a semicircle. B. corycaeus occurs in the north of Burma, where it, according to aquarium enthusiasts occurs far to the north and also high up in the mountains. Reports that in Putao, the “classic” type locality of the species, it sometimes even snows, should be regarded with caution. At least my B. corycaeus, which are definitely from Putao, prefer to be kept warm. At least under 23 ° C they do not show any spawning activity and a cold winter period, neither they nor their grandparents have required over the years. Badis corycaeus in both sexes is yellowish- to reddish-brown with darker transverse bands. Males in their mating colors become dark reddish brown to burgundy with very striking bright white ventral fin leading edges and an equally bright white dorsal fin seam. 79 from the left Badis siamensis „Phuket“ Fry/Juvenile Badis blosyrus (both pictures: K.-H. Roßmann) Badis ferrarisi Kullander & Britz, 2002, which I myself have not kept, comes from the Myitkina district in northern Burma. It differs from all other Badis by the fact that the crossbands on the body do not extend over the whole body , but cover only barcode like the middle of the body. Its basic color is a muddy reddish brown with intense brown fin seams. Badis ruber, B Khwae. and B. siamensis form the Badis ruber group. It is distinguished by the following characteristics: no dark anterior dorsal fin rays, no post opercular spot, caudal spot not exactly on the tail base, but moved forward a little, in B. ruber and B. siamensis also moved upward. Badis ruber Schreitmüller, 1923, which was formerly falsely known as burmanicus, lives in southern and central Burma, where as its congeners, inhabits standing and slowly flowing small bodies of water. It is reddish brown in both sexes, with the usual badis-cross lines which can be covered by longitudinal rows of dots. Males in breeding colors are dark burgundy, and the longitudinal rows of dots appear to be black with a green shine. Badis khwae Kullander & Britz, 2002 inhabits western Thailand at the originof the Menam Khwae Noi, in the tourist jargon better known as River Quai. B. khwae females are reddish brown with a caudal spot located, although in the middle, a little before the final cross bow . The males during courtship and parental care are colored dark burgundy with a striking bright seam on the dorsal fin, which also has a red base. Badis siamensis Klausewitz, 1957, comes from the west coast of southern Thailand and the offshore islands. Known localities are Khao Lak and the island Phuket. The fish are ocher brown in color with darker longitudinally oriented rows. The caudal spot is located at an angle slightly before the base and slightly above the center of the tail, but is much smaller than in B. ruber. Breeding males are stained dark chocolate brown with whiteseamed dorsal fins. We’ll continue now with the two “dissidents” who display a very different way of life and therefore also differ significantly in the aquarium maintenance from the other Badis. First Badis assamensis Ahl, 1937, and B. blosyrus Kullander & Britz, 2002. These fish are occasionally imported from India., where B. blosyrus has been described from from North Bengal and B. assamensis, as the name suggests, has been reported from Assam. The distinction between B. blosyrus and B. assamensis is not so easy, mainly because one species was described from adult fish and the 80 other from very small juveniles. Anyway there are two different forms available in the stores, which have differently pointed mouths. And that leads us immediately to the main characteristic of these type (s), their predatory lifestyle. The fish have a deeply divided, big mouth and are able to eat huge chunks. Earthworms, equally long as the fish, are not a problem. Co-inhabitation with these fish is therefore a problem. Badis assamensis / blosyrus prey on smaller fish at night. Fish that have been ignored completely during the day are gone the next morning. Hence these fish do are not just similar in appearance to their cousins, the Nandidae. Regarding the size, both forms dominate considerably the other Badis species, adult males can easily reach 9 cm Regarding color the fish cannot be confused with any other Badis, the animals are light ocher, with irregular rows of dark spots, which on the pebble bottom of a stream bed makes them perfectly camouflaged. The fish have as all members of the Badis group a dorsal spot and a central caudal spot, but the black spot, which in all representatives of the Badis group lies behind the gill cover is in B. assamensis / blosyrus located on the gill cover. Males ready to breed change their color from stone-red to dark burgundy, to almost black, with a thin bright blue seam at the edge of the fins. Badis assamensis / blosyrus are also “sand fish” in their behavior, who appreciate a flat-lying stone where under they will dig a hole on their own. A continuous breeding setup, which is in all other Badis no problem, does not succeed in B. assamensis / blosyrus. Apparently the fish effectively hunt their own offspring. Badis sp. „Buxar“,named after the Buxar Tiger Reserve in north Bengal, from where the first imports have arrived, differs in several respects from all other Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 representatives of the Badidae. The fish is undoubtedly to be regarded as a separate undescribed species. It is because of it’s pattern considered a member of the corycaeus group, but in addition to their pattern have a dumbbell-shaped mark, which is formed by one dark spot in the soft part of dorsal and anal fins and connecting horizontal stripes between the two spots. Fully colored the fish are wine red with a turquoise seam on the edge of the dorsal fin. The ventral fins of B. sp. “Buxar are” in contrast to those of the other Badis pointed and curved backwards. The fish rests on these fins similar like a sled on it’s runners for example, since Badis sp. “Buxar is a belly sliders with a goby-like reduced air-bladder function and the corresponding swimming behaviour. The fish live in fast-flowing streams and therefore need flowing oxygen-rich water. If their demands are met, sp. “Buxar” are very appealing aquarium fish. They are a maximum of 4.5 cm in size and are much more lively than the other Badis. Even if their territoria are quite small, they are vigorously defended, making the fish lovely little poison dwarfs. Breeding is similar to other Badis, where B. sp. “Buxar is” in my experience the Badis with the largest eggs. The genus Dario was separated from the genus Badis by Kullander and Britz in their article. To anyone who saw the first imported Dario, it had to be clear that these belonged in a separate genus. Despite that a notoriously fast writer already described them as a new kind of Badis, although he knew that Kullander & Britz were working on their article. Britz and Kullander then found out this “new” species had already been described. Our man had on top of that not done his homework. The species of the genus Dario are smaller than those of the genus Badis. The largest known species of Dario is only 3.5 cm long. Dario have very elongated ventral fins, they can extend to the end of the anal fin when pressed against the body. Of the typical Badis traits, only, and only in some species, the dorsal spot can be seen. All Dario species are colored predominantly red, and some are downright bright red. The females are inconspicuously yellow-gray with dark cross bands, more or less pronounced. The currently known distribution area ranges from North Bengal via Assam and Bangladesh to northern Burma. One species, Dario dayingensis, even exceeds the border into China. The Dario species are fundamentally different from Badis in their reproductive behavior. All Badis are all obligatory cave spawners, Dario spawns in moss or algae pads, where the laid eggs until the free swimming stage are guarded by the parents. The females are lured to the spawning site with a very lively, almost butterfly-like courtship. The eggs, which are not so protected by the surroundings like in Badis species, must therefore be defended intensely. Dario are for their size amazingly assertive and their territoria are also much bigger than we would give these little guys credit for. The fry are significantly smaller than that of the Badis species and feeding cannot under any circumstances be done at once with artemia nauplii. For intensive high-yield breeding rotifers or infusoria must be provided. The continuous breeding setup, where in densely planted aquaria fry are raised with their parents, is a Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 from the left Dario dario-male (Picture: K.-H. Roßmann) Dario sp. „Tiger“ (Picture: K.-H. Roßmann) highly recommended method, but works only really well if we feed additional infusoria or at least micro worms. This is also very good for the adults, because they eat, the same as Badis, only live food. And that should be according to the size of the fish, so very small. Another downside, Dario cannot be fed on a permanent basis with Artemia, though, or perhaps because they like them very much. Exclusive or predominant feeding with Artemia, sooner or later leads to a fatty liver. For the rest is keeping Dario fairly simple. The water values do not matter and because of the northern distribution area a heater in the aquarium is unnecessary. Dario dario (Hamilton, 1822) is the first imported, and the smallest known species. Its natural habitat is in north Bengal, where they can live with Badis badis and Badis blosyrus in the same waters. The fish were first introduced with the trade name Badis „scarlet“ “, a name which is even now still seen occasionally. After a hasty first description, they then sailed under the flag “Badis bengalensis” Tomey, 1999, until Kullander and Britz realized that the fish had first been described a hundred and eighty years ago and took the logical step, and 81 from the left Dario hyshinon and Dario sp. Dario sp.-female Dario sp.-male (pictures: K.-H. Roßmann established a new genus Dario dario. Dario dario is almost 2cm long, and is considered the smallest known perch-like fish. The caudal fin is straightly truncated at the end and the ventral fins of males are very long. There are no dark markings, only the females bear more or less distinct dark cross bands on a light gray background. The males are spectacularly colorful, bright red with turquoise blue stripes, especially the blue rimmed elongated pelvic fins, and when in breeding mood, the whole fish looks like its illuminated from within. Dario hysginon Kullander & Britz, 2002, also known under the trade name “Flame Red“, lives in northern Burma. At 2.5 cm it is slightly larger as D. dario and is colored monochromatic red and marked only with a black dorsal spot. The females are a light rusty brown color. They too show the dorsal spot occasionally. Dario sp. „Black Tiger“ is a yet undescribed species of which not even the natural origin is known, because the importers keep silent on the subject. It is suspected to occur in northern Bangladesh. Black Tiger is next to Dario dayingensis the largest known Dario, it is about 3 cm long. For Dario ratios it is also very high. The main attraction in this species is the tail fin, which like any other Dario is truncated but at the edges has elongated fin tips. The ventral fins are very long, they can in fully grown males reach the tail fin and are very conspicuous because of their black color. The fish go through a distinct color change in their life. After the light-brown juvenile color, young males first show a red-brown color with dark stripes. When the fish get larger, the dark stripes at the front are widening and the stripes ate the rear are narrowing until the fish front is black and from the middle it is bright red. In addition to the here pre- 82 sented, for the most part already bred Badidae, there are quite a few already described, but not yet imported species, and also some already imported, but not yet described forms. The fishtrade tends, as is well-known, to care little or not at all about valid names. The fish are named in a way so they sell well. Many new or rarely imported Badidae are sold under flase names. For Badis sp. „Buxar“ and B. cf. kanabos that was also the case. So if Badis badis are offered in large numbers in the trade and if they are declared as Wildcaught, it’s worth it to take a closer look. Even if it turns out to be “only” normal Badis badis. Literature Kullander, S. & Britz, R. 2002. Revision of the family Badidae (Teleostei: Perciformes), with description of a genus and ten new species. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, Vol. 13(4): 295-372. Voort, S. vd. 2008. Einige ausgefallene Blaubarsche. Amazonas, 4, Nr. 20: 45-50. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Working group nandids and related fish Nandus nandus (Hamilton, 1822) – the Gangetic Leaffish By Rudolf Rucks With the following article I would like to contribute to the overall picture of this fish species. For more than 50 years I have, apart from short breaks, exclusively tended to the care and breeding of Nandidae. So I have kept, and even bred: Polycentrus, Polycentropsis, Monocirrhus, Nandus nebulosus and N. nandus. The last one only I have now kept and bred for the past 10 years. I have collected information from the literature and included it within this essay in order to be complete. On Systematics Kullander & Britz (2002) restricted the family of Nandidae to the genus Nandus with the species N. nandus, N. nebulosus, N. oxyrhynchus and newly added, N. andrewi *. The genera Polycentrus, Polycentropsis and Monocirrhus have been placed in the family of Polycentridae. As for Afronandus I tend to believe they are Nandidae. But to my knowledge there is still not sufficient aquarium evidence on the reproductive biology. The * In 2006, Nandus prolixus Chakrabarty, Oldfield & Ng, 2006 and in 2008 by Ng also Nandus mergatus Ng, 2008 from the Musi River, Sumatra, were newly described(Editor note). genera Polycentrus, Polycentropsis and Monocirrhus also differ a lot from the Nandus species according to my observations so that separation is only logical. Anatomy and appearance The fin formula is: D XII/XIV/11-13, A III/7-9. The soft rays portion of the dorsal and anal fins are sharply divided as in the Polycentridae and rounded. The fish have ctenoid scales, scales with a thorny free edge. The total length according to literature data reaches 15 cm (females), an indication that I can confirm in, for example, six-year old fish. The elongated body has a typical perch-like form, the muzzle is pointed, as in the Polycentridae far protrudable. Numerous sharp teeth in the jaws, palate and on the tongue ensure the retention of the prey, especially fish. The animals in my posession vary in color from dark olive to bright-yellow metallic, especially in the twilight. The sides are marked with dark spots, which coalesce to cross lines. The spiny dorsal and anal fin and the rounded tail fin have a mottled appearance forming lines. The typical blaze in Polycentridae is also frequently visible in Nandus. The intestine, characteristic of a faunivore, piscivore fish, shows only a few turns, the stomach is sac shaped and very expandable. Nandus is a visually oriented predator. The lateral line is interrupted, and in my experience plays only a minor role in the acquisition of prey. In water with sufficient oxygen, breathing Locations of Nandus nandus (Map: Internet) Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 83 from the left Nandus nandus (Picture: F. Schäfer) Gangetic Leaffish after Cuvier Nandus andrewi (Picture: Internet) is hardly detectable, the pectoral fin movements are relatively slow. The swimming method is rapid, with brief interruptions, at dusk the fish are extremely active. Occurrence and Locations N. nandus occupies the entire Indian subcontinent as far as Myanmar. Typical habitats are quiet stretches of rivers, lake-like extensions of the rivers, flooded rice fields, overgrown ditches and also carp breeding ponds. some phytoplankton. Juveniles in sizes from 21 mm - 35 mm feed on Notonecta (probably larvae), aquatic insects and a lower proportion of zooplankton. Interesting are the studies of the stomach and intestinal content of 40 mm - 138 mm long Nandus. Most of the stomachs were empty, in rare cases they were very full. It was found that Carp fry, but also Oxygaster sp., Puntius sp. Amblypharyngodon mola, Ambassis nama and Ambassis ranga were eaten. The feeding on fish is clearly dominant. Aquatic insects and shrimp serve as a supplement a distinctly smaller proportion. For me as a passionate live food catcher the challenging task to obtain similar food is apparent from these data. Diet in the wild Behavior in the aquarium, care and breeding From the excellent work by P. Parameswaran et al. (1970) observations and results of stomach examinations of various sizes and ages are available to me. In postlarval stage, 3.5 mm - 7 mm, the animals primarily feed on zooplankton, namely Branchionus, Conochilus, Keratella, Polyarthra, cladocerans such as Moina, Bosmina, Simocephalus, Ceriodaphnia, and copepods such as Diaptomus, Cyclops and their nauplii. This is very interesting, since these species also occur here. Small amounts of phytoplankton are also included, such as blue-green and green algae. The larger postlarval stadia, 8 mm - 20 mm, consume cladocerans, copepods and Several year old females reach a length of about 15 cm, the males remain significantly smaller, up to 10 cm. With me the animals reached an age of about 8 years, but subsequently showed definite signs of aging such as lying on the bottom etc. Tanks with measurements 1 mx 0.50 mx 0.50 m (standard store size) are suitable for 4 adult specimens. As already mentioned, the fish are mostly active at dusk, then they are especially lively and even capable of jumping out of the tank. My Nandus-tank looks like this: A single large Echinodorus bleheri in a pot filled with garden soil fills the tank. Its bushy growth serves as a shelter to the fish during the day. In addition, 84 inverted cups must be available to the fish as an additional shelter, since during the day Nandus are relatively shy and timid, although there are individual differences. No other decoration items are used. Differences in temperature from winter to summer range from 24-30 ° C. Filtration is unnecessary, a airpump and internal spongefilter provide sufficient water movement. RO water at about 120 micro Siemens / cm, a neutral pH , and a nitrate level of about 30 mg per liter or less, are proper values. Every 3 weeks a water change of 30 liter is carried out, and the bottom of the tank, which is covered only with a thin layer of gravel, is siphoned off completely. In the bucket the gravel is then stirred and the dirty water is subsequently disposed. Then the gravel is returned to the tank again. This is very effective to keep the tank clean and is in line with a relocation of the fish in the wild. Because the Nandus remain in their shelters during the day it is possible to fully illuminate the tank. I place great value on added sunlight. After ten-hours of lighting, at 18:00 o’clock, a dusk light is switched on. The fish shortly afterwards leave their hiding places and move freely in the tank. Nandus species are next to teir general faunivorous behaviour very piscivorous and require in my experience feederfish in the form of wild fish, if possible from waters that are not or rarely frequented by fisheating birds (otherwise, chances of a worm infection are, according to the literature, quite large). I catch in private waters carp and Moderlieschen (with permission of Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 course), Amphipods from fish-free water, Notonecta, Caddis larvae, white and black mosquito larvae supplement the diet. Analogous to the natural situation, I try to feed moderate amounts of food, the fish should always be hungry and only seldom be allowed to gorge themselves. Reproduction and breeding aspects According to Parameswaran et al. (1970) the spawning period of Nandus nandus in Assam extends from late March till the the middle of July. I can confirm this from my aquarium experiences, which are similar. From August till March no spawning activity will take place, the females also do not show any corpulence. At the start of spawning the females become very restless, swim through the entire tank and swim up and down against the glass. One or more males follow her and an actual hunt takes place. Males try to force themselves into a parallel position to the female, and then wraps himself around her and presses, after which ovulation occurs in several episodes where around 50 eggs are fertilized each time. The entire spawning takes up to one h. Te number of eggs can be thousands. According to my observations spawning occurs only at dusk or dawn. The eggs are scattered on the plant leaves and on the ground, are clear and transparent, and slightly yellow. The diameter of the eggs is 0.7 0.8 mm and they are contain oilglobules. Interesting that one can also find oil-globules in the eggs of Anabas testudineus and Channa sp., which in their case are pelagic, whereas they sink in Nandus. All eggs are laid in one spawn. Electon microscopic scans by Britz (1997) have shown that the animal pole of the egg attaches to the substrate with the microphylls, by means of many carpet-like sticky threads. This confirms my observations on the adhesive capacity of the eggs. The microphyll, the inlet opening A second species of the Genus Nandus: Nandus nebulosus in normal coloration (above) and in fright coloration (below). (both pictures: Msc. J. Schmidt) for sperm at the animal pole of the egg is in the Polycentridae on the other end of the substrate, ie the exact opposite. The adults will not take care of the eggs, so there is no paternal care. This is also true for N. nebulosus, which I bred for many years. Significant differences in the reproductive biology of these two species I could not establishl. At temperatures of around 27 ° C, 120 micro Siemens / cm and a pH 6.9 the eggs hatch after approximately 30 hours and are then hanging with their ventral side on the glass and on the sword plant Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 leaves. Corresponding glands allow for attachment. There is no head gland with mucous threads as found in the Polycentridae. The incubation period is also much shorter than the previously mentioned species. The oil-globules in the yolk sac are visible. The function is not clear to me, since neither the eggs nor embryos are able to float. The size of the larva is about 2 mm. The swim bladder filling must occur under water, which in the Polycentridae is done by swallowing air at the surface. After another 48 hours, the larvae start to swim free, at a length of approximately 3.5 mm. After sepa85 A freshly hatched emryo with oil globules ration of a number of the postlarvalen stage fry into a 60-cm tank, planted with Hygrophila, the first feeding with Cylops naupliae, mixed with among other rotifers, takes place. This zooplankton is caught with a net of bolting with a mesh of 50/1000 mm. Abstract In summary the following can be stated after a number of spawns: Soft water with similar values as in the parent tank should be used. The growth is rapid, so that after 4 to 5 days already small Cyclops and Diaptomus are accepted. After 11 days, the fry are already reached a size of about 1 cm and the fins are fully present. Now small mayfly larvae of the genus Cloeon are accepted. A separation will follow, ten of the largest specimens are selected and raised in a larger tank, during the last spawn a 1.20 m tank was used. The fry color is light beige with no marbling. The pointed shape of the head is fully formed. There are cannibalistic attempts, which in similar sized fish are not successful. After 18 days, a size of about 1.8 cm is reached, after 3 weeks about 2.5 cm and large Cloeon larvae and Chaoborus pupae are now accepted. After a month, at about 3 cm in length,te juveniles have assumed the coloration of the adult animals. Unlike the adults the young fish are extremely active during the day up until then. They eat among other damselfly larvae (from a private pond), which have a length of 2 cm, so that the sacshaped stomach is full to the point of bursting. At a size of about 4 cm, at 5 weeks, large amphipods were taken. At a length of about 5 cm at 2 months I start to feed chopped-up pieces of carp, which are eagerly taken after some initial hesitation. At 3 months, with a length of about 6 cm, live Moderlieschen of 4 cm are eaten already. Concluding remarks Nandus nandus are very interesting fish for aquarium enthusi- 86 (Foto: S. Inselmann) asts, wo regard also the biological aspect of aquarium keeping.There is still some research to be done. Possibly within the IGL there are some interested parties, who would like to keep these fish. That would really make me happy. Literature Parameswaran, S. et al. 1970. Some observations on the biology and life-history of Nandus nandus. Pond Culture Unit of Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Yaysagar, Assam, Communicated bei Dr. BS Bhimachar: 143-145. Britz, R. 1997. Egg Surface Structure and Larvale Clement Glands in Nandid and Badid Fishes. American Museum Novitates. Published by the American Museum of Natural History, New York, Nr. 3195: 17 pp. Heok He eng & Zeehan Jaffar 2008. A new species of leaf fish, Nandus andrewi. Zootaxa 1731: 24. Holly, M. o. J. Nandus nandus. In: Die Aquarienfische in Wort und Bild: 26-27. Stuttgart. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Working group Bichir’s/Reedfish/Lungfish Polypterus senegalus Cuvier, 1829 – the bichir from Senegal By Hugues Van Besien (F) Etymology Polypterus derives from the Greek; Poly = more, Pterus = wing, which originates from the fin on the back of the fish. senegalus from Latin = found in the Senegal-River. Synonyms: Polypterus senegalensis is a typographical error. Polypterus arnaudii Dumeril, 1870 invalid junior synonym. Englisch: Gray Bichir, Deutsch : Senegal-Flösselhecht Original description of reedfish) belong. Many different names are still common in the literature. One often reads that they can be directly assigned to the Chondrostei. After Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, a zoologist, who as one of many scientists accompanied Napoleon Bonaparte on the expedition to Egypt, discovered the first Polypterus and described it as Polyptère bichir [Polypterus bichir (Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1802)] (Töpfer 1998) it became clear how strange these creatures were. They have fascinated biologists ever since. One of them, Samuel Budgett (1872-1904), even lost his life during the exploration of the reproduction of these animals (Budgett, JS 1901, Hall, 2001). The Polypteridae have paired lungs, which are used for breathing atmospheric oxygen. They have as juveniles external gills and have on top of that many other anatomical oddities, some very special, like old-fashioned scales, the so-called Ganoid scales , only four gill arches and many more. Those are ancient features of a very old family. Today, all representatives of this family are found exclusively in Africa. But fossils show that they once were very wide spread, that they lived on the ancient This was done by Georges Cuvier in Le règne animal distribué d’après son organisation, 2nd edition (1829). Systematik The systematics of Polypterus was highly controversial during the last two hundred years. Now they have been placed within the bony fish (Osteichthyes) of the ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii). As members of a separate subclass Cladistia they occupy a rather isolated position. They form a separate order Bichirs Polypteriformes with a single family Bichir - Polypteridae to which two genera Polypterus (14 species) and Erpetoichtys: (a sort Polypterus bichir, the first known Bichir originates from Cuvier (Cuvier 1829) Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 87 scales. New genetic research provide insight on the question of the phylogenetic position of Polypteridae as an ancient and special group within the natural history of fish (Noack, Zardoya & Meyer 1996). The first picture of Polypterus senegalus Discovered and first described by E . Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire (after Guichenot 1839). continent of Gondwana, perhaps survived for 120 million years and for at least 60 million years show little change. Fossils have been found for example in South America (Gayet & Meunier, 1991, Werner & Gayet, 1997, Dutheil, 1999, Gayet, Meunier & Werner 2002). Unfortunately usually only small pieces are found, such as In his book on the Polypteridae Frank Schäfer proposes to split the various species into several groups (Schaefer 2004). Polypterus senegalus was relatively isolated, the three other groups were: the P. bichir group, the P. delhezi group and the P. palmas group. As indicators of Polypterus senegalus the following features were named: The dorsal fin begins before the middle of the body, but not as early as in the other groups, the upper jaw is longer than the under jaw, and the species is both diurnal and nocturnal. All living Polypterus species have an elongated body, tubular nostrils and the so-called “Finlets” - anatomically complex fin structures on the back. The finlets consist of spines, from which several soft rays originate Meristics (after Schafer): 53 - 61 lateral line scales, 34 - 40 scales around body,, 15 to 21 predorsal scales ; Number of dorsal finlets 8 to 11, usually 9 or 10 Description Image 3: Classification of Cladistia 88 (after Hoegg et al. 2004) In the literature and on many websites frequently a length of up to 50 cm or even 70 cm is described for P.senegalus. This information is not correct. Schaefer, who measured hundreds of fish from different origin at ‘Glaser’(international fish importer in Germany, note translator) and in the collections of museums, never found an animal, which was longer than 35 cm. Of 169 fish caught in the river Chari, none was longer than 32 cm (Daget 1965). Of 110 fish from the River Pru in Ghana the largest specimen was 35 cm long (Dankwa, 2003). In it’s first year P. senegalus grows to a size of 10 to Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 12cm. Under good conditions, P. senegalus needs 4 to 5 years to reach it’s maximum size (Daget 1965). They can get very old. One has survived for 34 years in the aquarium (Brown, 1957). The Senegal-bichir has the most elongated shape of all living Polypteridae. Seen from above the head is heavily emphasized, the fish are widest at the gills. They do not swim eel-like since the scale armor is relatively stiff. On the back the animal is uniformly gray-brown in color, slightly grayish-white below, without any markings, except for a white line that marks the lower jaw, and a “tear line” behind the eyes to the throat. All other species of the genus show marbled appearances or deviations thereof. P. senegalus only has a regular series of discreet dots on both sides of the back. The color never changes, neither because of mood, nor wen in the spawning season. The young have three dark stripes along the body, which are disappearing at a length of 5 cm. They also have salamander-like external gills, which disappear in the course of growth. However, they can be present for a long time. 10-12 cm long animals have been observed wich still had exterior gills. “Albinos” are commercially farmed in Asia, both black-eyed with a yellow body and red-eyed with a white body. The membrane of the finlets is gray. The ventral fins are small and are close to the anal fin. The anal fin is located directly in front of the tail fin. The tail fin is elliptical, asymmetrical and joins seamlessly into the dorsal fin. The tail makes up 20 percent of the length of the juveniles, but only 10 percent in adult fish. Sexual dimorphism P. senegalus is sexually mature more quickly than most other species, which need 6 years or even longer. Both sexes can be distinguished very well even at a length of 15 cm. The male has a larger, Polypterus senegalus, the black dots in the last finlets only occur in the dwarf form (both pictures : F. Schäfer) wider anal fin than the female. One often reads that the animals are already sexually mature after 1 to 2 years. When animals are of the same age during the growth phase, the females are usually slightly larger than the males. P. senegalus, one of the smaller members of the genus Polypterus, is equally long-lived as it’s larger family members. Habitat and behaviour P. senegalus is widespread in Africa and is locally fairly common. It is Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 present in all river basins where water drains into the Atlantic Ocean and in the Nile Basin, from the edge of the Sahel to the forest zones on both sides of the equator. It lives in the quietest parts of the rivers, which are often connected to wetlands. At the start of the rainy season, it wanders into the flood zones of the papyrus or reed marshes (Cyprus papyrus, Typha sp.) or flood plains (floodplains with Oryza longistaminata, Eragrostis barteri). There, the water is often low in oxygen. Among the species that migrate there as well, are catfish (Clarias species, Heter89 P. senegalus, the normal form shows no black dots in the rear finlets. obranchus, Synodontis), bush fish (C. kingsleyae) Parachanna who also have the ability to breathe air, and robust bass and the African Osteoglossus Heterotis niloticus (Hickley & Bailey 1987 So our Polypterus lives both in clear and in turbid waters. Here and there we can even read that it can even walk short distances on land. The Ganoid scales would offer protection against the elements. Young fish often hide in the dense root network of Eichornia crassipes, which was introduced into Africa and which causes the water at night to be very low in oxygen. Research has shown that the species P. senegalus is not endangered. In some areas, their numbers declined dramatically because of hydraulic structures (dams) and by the reduction in flood areas since the species reproduces slowly (Howell 1983, Lae, 1995). The analysis of stomach contents shows that the Senegal bichir feeds mainly on invertebrates, including freshwater crabs and dragonfly larvae, food which requires strong jaws. Indeed, its widespread occurence, it’s seasonal life and the behavior in the aquarium, lead to the assumption that it is above all an opportunist with a taste for dead flesh. Once even a bird’s bone was found in the stomach. That is what explains in today’s world the success of Polypteridae. These animals are not top predators. They do not swim as fast and are not very maneuverable, do not have eagle eyes, but only it’s sense of smell leads them to their feed. If you see them eating in the aquarium, you must start to 90 (Picture: F. Schäfer) wonder, if you see how clumsily they grab the food. Only if they have the nose directly on the food, they bite. During the day they remain calm at the surface or on the ground and only move when hungry or upset. In the aquarium a few crumbs of food to set the fish in motion. During the night they are much more active and swim around. Keeping This long-lived, relatively large but peaceful fish does not need an oversized tank. It is enough to have an about a 1 m long aquarium. The difficulty lies more in keeping the water clean in tanks that are too small , as predators, and to this group belong the Senegal bichirs, have much waste materials. The size of the water surface Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 is more important than the water level. Many hiding places, but also enough free swimming space should be available. The water parameters are relatively unimportant, the temperature is best kept between 18 to 28 ° C . The species is very resistant, but can carry skin parasites of the genus Macrogyrodactylus, which must be combated. P. senegalus is known as a jumper. During the spawning season, it jumps frequently and violently. As a precautionary measure against jumping out glass covers must be used and also the space between the surface and light tubes should be covered. One must be careful to ensure that all animals of a group get food, otherwise it may happen that always the same, larger animals eat, and the smaller fish get too little. Therefore, it is better to feed until saturation of all fish, in combination with fasting days. Most foods, including frozen, is accepted, as long as they can smell it. Mussels, fish pieces, etc., even animal meat is eaten eagerly. I could not bring myself to feed the latter, out of fear for gastrointestinal problems, especially at relatively low temperatures. The assessment of the behavior of the animals of this type is very different according to the authors. Maybe it depends on age. Perhaps it may also change during the spawning period. The coexistence with other species can be problematic. Large, active neighbors can be problematic with regard too enough food left, and too small a fish will be killed and eaten. That usually happens at night, even if it is believed that the clumsy Polypterus cannot have been responsible. Jo Gallo reported that he kept Polypterus senegalus together with Congo tetras (Phenacogrammus interruptus), cichlids (Pelvicachromis) Ctenopoma and knife fish (Xenomystus) (Gallo 2004). The riskyest is the insertion of new fish in an aquarium, which is already a Polypterus home. P. senegalus – The normal form. Breeding Some websites claim that breeding in the aquarium has not yet occurred. That is not true. Captive animals have been constantly bred since the sixties in aquariums. P. senegalus seems also to be the only Polypterus-species, which is commercially farmed, even if many fish offered in shops in Europe are wild fish cought in Nigeria. The key to breeding is in the imitation of the conditions that prevail at the beginning of the rainy season. Much information I learned from the book by Frank Schafer (Schafer 2004). It has enabled me to finally realize my long time inter- Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 (both pictures: F. Schäfer) est in Polypterus, and I hope that my animals will be reproducing shortly. The conductivity of the keeping tanks should be relatively high (1700 microsiemens at 18 to 22 ° C). In a span of 5 to 6 weeks, the conductivity should then be reduced to 500 microseconds, combined with a temperature raise to 26 - 28 degrees Celsius. Alternatively, one transfers the animals to a different tank, especially if the female is ready. In nature, the spawning season is from May to June. The male begins courtship display in which the female is followed for a long time and prods her in the side. He swims up, jumps out of 91 the water, spreads finlets and fins, and then swims under the female. The female selects the spawning site (usually in a dense tuft of plants) and emits 100 to 300 eggs (in the early morning?), which easily stick to plants. It takes a few days for the larvae to hatch. In contrast to the large species P. senegalus has the reputation of eating their own eggs. The eggs measure 2 to 3 mm in diameter. 7 to 10 days, the larvae remain virtually motionless and consume the yolk sac. Then you can start to feed artemia nauplii and microworms that need to be spread in the aquarium using some current. Please note, larger juveniles eat their smaller siblings. Literature BROWN, M.E. 1957. Experimental studies on growth. In Brown M.E. (ed.). The physiology of fishes. Vol. I. Metabolism, p. 361-400. New York. BUDGETT, J.S. 1901. On the breeding-habits of some WestAfrican fishes, with an account of the external features in development of Protopterus annectens, and a description of the larva of Polypterus lapradei. Transaction of the Zoological Society of London, 16: 115-136. CUVIER, G. 1829. Le Règne animal distribué d’après son organisation, pour servir de base à l’histoire naturelle des animaux, et d’introduction à l’anatomie comparée. Paris. DAGET, J., Bauchot M.L. & ARNOULT, J. 1965. Etude de la croissance chez Polypterus senegalus (Cuvier). Acta zoologica, n°46: 297-309. Auch online: http://horizon. documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/ pleins_textes/pleins_textes_5/b_ fdi_08-09/10507.pdf. DANKWA, H. 2003. Biology of Polypterus senegalensis in Pru River, Ghana. ACP-EU Fisheries research Report, (14): 23-24. DUTHEIL, D. 1999. The first articulated fossil cladistian: Serenoichtys kemkemensis gen. et sp. nov from the cretaceous of Morocco. Journal of vertebrate Paleontology 19(2): 243-246. GALLO, J. 2004. Senegal (Cuvier’s) Bichir. Auch online: http://www. aquariumadvice.com/articles/ articles/70/1/Senegal-CuviersBichir---Polypterus-senegalus-Cuvier/Page1.html GAYET, M., MEUNIER, J.-F. & WERNER, C. 2002. Diversification in Polypteriformes and Special Comparison with the Lepisosteiformes. Palaontology, 45(2): 361376. GAYET, M., MEUNIER, J.-F. & SIRE, J.-Y. 1995. Approche phylogénétiques des polyptériformes (Pisces, cladistia) = Phylogentic approach of the polypteriformes. GEOBIOS, n°19: 193-196. GAYET, M. & MEUNIER, J.-F. 1991. First discovery of Polypteridae (Pisces, Cladistia, Polypteriformes) outside of Africa. Geobios, 24, Issue 4: 463-466. GUICHENOT, A. 1839. Monographie de deux genres de poissons, les Lepisostees et les Polypteres. In: GUERIN-MENEVILLE, F.E. 1839. Magasin de zoologie, d’anatomie comparée et de paléontologie. Arthus-Bertrand. HALL, B.K. 2001. John Samuel Budgett (1872-1904): In Pursuit of Polypterus. BioScience, 51(5): 399-407. 92 HICKLEY, P. & BAILEY, R.G. 1987. Fish communities in the eastern, seasonal-floodplain of the Sudd, Southern Sudan. Hydrobiologia, 144(3): 243-250. HOEGG, S., BRINKMANN, H., TAYLOR, J.S. & MEYER, A. 2004. Phylogenetic timing of the fishspecific genome duplication correlates with the diversification of teleosts fish. Journal of molecular evolution 59: 190-203. Auch online: http://www. ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/ volltexte/2007/3297/ HOWELL, P.P. 1983. The impact of the jonglei Canal in the Sudan. The geographical Journal, 149(3): 286-300. LAË, R. 1995. Climatic and anthropogenic effects on fish diversity and fish yields in the central delta of the river Niger. Aquatic Living Resources, n° 8: 43-58. NOACK, K. , ZARDOYA, R. & MEYER, A. 1996. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the Bichir (polypterus ornatipinnis), a basal Ray-finned fish: ancient establishment of the consensus Vetebrate gene order. Genetics, 144(3): 1165–1180. Schäfer, F. 2004. Polypterus Flösselhechte Bichirs. Rodgau. Töpfer, J. 1998. Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire und die Entdeckung der Polypteriden. Der Makropode, 20(5/6): 62-71. WERNER C. & Gayet, M. 1997. New fossil Polypteridae from the Cenomanian of Sudan. An evidence of their high diversity in the early Late Cretaceous. Cybium, 21(1): 67-81. Dazu noch eine Website: http:// www.polypterus.info/ Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 The literature team The newest working group Literature would like to introduce themselves By Bruno Urbanski Serious and responsible care of aquarium fish without proper knowledge is impossible. There are several ways to acquire the necessary knowledge. Discussions with other aquarists or competent specialist dealers are an opportunity to gather information. In aquaria associations and communities such as the IGL you meet like-minded people who gladly provide information. Essential is however the study of applicable literature, this is equal for the beginner, advanced or old hands. There is an incomprehensable number of books, journals and publications, dissertations, theses and studies which deal partly or solely with fish which are maintained in the IGL. Some members of the IGL have created extensive literature collections, or libraries, and maintain files containing literature - a wealth of material. These files have been created in Access, Word, Excel or other programs, each structured differently, all with very different search options. The Literature Working Group has set itself the goal to summarize the various files, to unify, to capture new and yet unno- Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 ticed old literature, evaluate and ultimately create a database in which very specific searches for fish and related information are possible. Another focus is the scanning of literature. These PDF files can then be requested by members. Of course, this will take time to complete and we will need help. Articles in different languages need to be evaluated, wantlists have to be processed, a lot of scanning needs to be done and…. To get an impression of of the quantities of material that needs to be processed. my personal database now contains round 9,000 references, and I estimate that at least another 4,000 - to 7000 will be added. We hope to be able to present a first version at the autumn meeting 2009, which should by then contain approximately 2,000 records. This will provide us with a solid basis to demonstrate the various application possibilities. To the WG Literature currently belong: Hans-Jürgen Ende, Stefan Inselmann, Gerhard Ott, Dr. Jürgen Schmidt, Dr. Thomas Seehaus, Jörg Töpfer, Bruno Urbanski. People that are interested in joining are very welcome! 93 The taxonomic research of the labyrinth fishes from 1758–2008 By Ingo Schindler Starting with the 10th Edition of Linneaus‘ Systema Naturae (1758), animal species are described using a Latin or Latinized binomial (genus and species). Even though Linnaeus was not the first person to use this system, he was the one who consistently implemented this for the whole of nature. The year 1758 is therefore in the „International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, “ defined as the starting point of zoological nomenclature. It was also Linneaus (1758) who described the first Labyrinth fish as Labrus opercularis (Now Macropodus opercularis). Since then 250 years have passed and 240 species taxa have been added (Counted early 2008). Not all of these Nomina necessarily repre- sent a separate species, a little over 70 of the nominal taxa are currently considered synonyms. Nevertheless, the steady increase shows on the one hand, that over time previously uncharted territories were opened up ichthyologically, and on the other hand a change in species concept, which especially took place in recent decades. The article will describe the various mechanisms which impact the number of species descriptions since the beginning of the nomenclatural era. Identifying and calculating the data As a basis for the statistical calculations in the article data is used from the „Catalog of Fishes“ (Eschmeyer 2008). Reviewed were all species taxa listed in the directory by early 2008 of the respective families. Despite testing the program written for the evaluation I cannot state that all entries have been counted correctly. Mistakes in the „Catalog of Fishes“ (Missing entries, incorrect spelling) could also lead to variations of the actual numbers. However, this only concerns – if any – a few cases. To get a clearer impression of the changes over time in the ά-taxonomical (alpha-Taxonomie = „The elementary level of taxonomy, which focuses on the identification and designation of the species“ Mayr 1975: 339) activities, for the presentation of the species descriptions (Image 2 a, b) combined values of eight years were used, and only the mean values are shown. The line connecting the individual data points was, in order to clarify the amplitudes, redesigned by using smooting methods. Number of Taxa Figure 1: First descriptions curve of all labyrinthfish taxa. Solid line = total number of described species, dotted line = number of ,currently considered, valid taxa, dashed line = number of synonyms. 94 Figure 1 shows the total number of labyrinthfish species taxa. Within the last 20 years it shows a steep rise. The curve of valid species follows the same angle, because the number of taxa considered a synonym has barely increased in the past 50 years. Without any further infomation you might assume that the taxonomists of earlier times were not attentive enough. But this is only partly true, because it must be borne in mind that past authors had for one no general Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Figure 2a: Taxonomic study of the Gourami family. x-axis = year, y-) axis = relative number (relative to the total number) of species descriptions, squares = number of authors. The arrows indicate changes that are discussed in more detail in the text. knowledge on biological relationships (for example, males and females have been considered to be members of different species). Moreover, the descriptions from the earliest phase of the taxonomic study were short and not very informative and were rarely accompanied by meaningful, life-like drawings. These authors could therefore not always properly assess which species had already been described. This resulted in the fact that during the period from 1800 to about 1860, the number of synonyms almost equals the number of valid taxa (in retrospect)l. In the “modern era” ( past 20 years) the curve increases (almost) exponentially, yet the line of synonyms remains the same. Does this mean that today there are no more conflicts between the views of different authors, or that the current taxonomists simply are better? Certainly not. It is rather the “modern” trimmed “pragmatic species concept”, which contributes to the recognition of any different population as a separate species (see also Schindler 2008). Figure 2b: Taxonomic study of the family Anabantidae. x-axis = year, y-) axis = relative number (relative to the total number) of species descriptions, squares = number of authors. Frequency of species descriptions in relationship to world events In Figure 2a, the relative number of first descriptions in conjunction with the number of authors (square size) is set against the time axis for the taxa of the Gourami family. The variations can be attributed, in some cases (marked with arrows) to historical events. In other cases it is likely that several incidents coincided. Therefore, other interpretations are certainly possible. The dark, upward arrows indicate increases and the downward arrows on the decreases. From left to right these could be attributed to the following, parallel occurring events. First ascent from the writings of Bloch and Lacepède. Thereafter, a decrease, which is possibly due to the Napoleonic wars. The following increase is explained by the starting colonization and exploration of Southeast Asia (Hamilton, etc.). The subsequent down arrow indicates a decrease in authors active at this time, which may also partly be linked to the Euro-Asian effects of the Crimean War could. At the beginning of the 20th Century, again a significant increase, which is Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 largely caused by the extensive publication of Regan. The First World War, the Great Depression and the 2nd World War are likely to be the causes for the following decreases, marked by the light arrows. The last upward arrow indicates an extremely increasing number. This increase is the result of the extensive development of completely new and hitherto barely explored areas, of better travel opportunities for taxonomic researchers, and of the changed concept of species and the increase of taxonomists involved in research. Perhaps while looking at the diagram you may relate tis to very different historical events or authors, who had an influence on the number of species descriptions. Figure 2b represents the same for the species of the family Anabantidae. Because of the relatively few taxa, the influences of historical events are not always clear. Still, it is interesting to see that the appearance of the curves of both Osphronemidae and Anabantidae show some similarities. I have been able to show similar correlations when analysing other fish families, so that at least some of the aforementioned historical events 95 have had a significant impact on the taxonomic study of living nature. The, in the last two decades drastically increased, number of taxa related to an increase in active authors (observable from the size of the squares) can also be seen in other animal groups (for other fish families this is also the case) . This could lead to the hereticalsounding question whether the “description” of a new Asian labyrinth fish, is caused solely by the growing number of active taxonomists, rather than - as one would normally assume – by the “discovery” of new forms (see for more on this relation the discussion in Benton 2008 on the correlation between the number of authors and the number of dinosaur genera). Certainly, this is not applicable here. Because the increase of the number of authors (represented by larger squares in the graph) also shows the increased willingness to cooperate between parties. On the other hand, we must not lose sight of that, with the assigned exploration of the biodiversity, there is an obligation to produce results. This and the variable interpretation of the species concept are two of the reasons, that lead to the worldwide and in all systematic groups of living nature observed rapid accumulation of scientific names (Agapov et a. 2004). The (artificial) increase, labelled as “taxonomical inflation”, in the number of species by processes that are not based on classic “discovery” can negatively impact the study of macroecological relationships, and hence also on Nature and species preservation (Isaac et al. 2004). From an aquarium point of view the scientific names are first of all an advantage. With these, it is possible to identify the fish we keep, and to name them internationally in a clear and consistent way. Subsequently, however, in the context of species preservation we are faced with the dilemma that more and more “sponsors” must be available, to maintain the rising number of taxonomically differentiated forms in aquaria.(see Finke 2008). The Authors Taxonomists that are responsible for at least four species taxa, are summarized in Figure 3. It should however be noted that the authorship of the publications by Cuvier & Valenciennes is not entirely clear to me. I therefore recorded both of them under a single name. In addition to that, it should be noted that the Vietnamese scientist Nguyen, who described four Macropodus-taxa (see Schindler, 2009), has not been included since the data was only included in later versions of the “Catalog of Fishes.” The name that appears most frequently in the species descriptions list is Ng (Singapore), followed by the Swiss Kottelat. At a distance the Dutch Bleeker is the first, already dead, historical author. Vierke is well known to many labyrinth fish friends as an author of aquarium related essays and writer in the Makropode. The list of the most active describers also includes Dr. Jürgen Schmidt (longtime editor and author of The Makropode), one of the internationally best known members of the IGL. The white column indicates the total number of species taxa published by the author and the colored column the amount thereof known to be synonyms. Neither from the height of the column, nor from the number of synonyms can any conclusions regarding the taxonomic skills of the people involved be drawn. There are definitely very good taxonomists, who have not submitted any, or relatively few, species descriptions. They often follow a conservative approach (different species concept) and focus more on complementary descriptions of not well researched species. Ernst Mayr, the “Darwin of the 20th Century “, pointed out in his recommendations on the zoological classification that (Mayr 1975: 247)” ... the re-description of poorly known representatives, is much more important, than the description of other new forms “. Outlook Fig. 3: The authors with the highest number of species descriptions. 96 The taxonomic study of the labyrinth fish is far from complete. We need to consider future species descriptions. The large number Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 of already available forms of different Betta’s (Linke 2007), Licorice gouramis (Finke 2008) and gouramis (Schafer 2008) illustrate this. Also from the study of the African “air breathers” “discoveries are expected shortly. The detailed analysis of the variation of various African species could, if the modern species concept is applied, result in the growth of the number of taxa. In addition, the ichthyological exploration of the Congo Basin has only in recent years been intensified. But also the renaming (see Trichogaster versus Colisa; Töpfer 2008) and synonymising (as has happened in M. erythropterus = M. spechti, see Schindler, 2009) will retain it’s influence on the scientific names of our Labyrinths. Literature Agapow, P.M. et al. 2004. The impact of species concept on bio- diversity studies. Quar. Rev. Biol., 79: 161–179. Benton, M. J. 2008. How to find a dinosaur, and the role of synonymy in biodiversity studies. Paleobiol., 34: 516–533. Eschmeyer, W.N. 2008. Catalog of fishes. California Academy of Sciences – Ichthyology. OnlineVersion February 2008. Finke, P. 2008. Der Prachtguramibestand in unseren Aquarien im Herbst 2008. Der Makropode, 30(4): 119–128. IMPRESSUM Präsidium Präsident Auke de Jong De Hooge Campen 11 7943 HV Meppel Niederlande – Nederland Tel. +31 (0)522260166 E-Mail: [email protected] Vizepräsidenten Michel Dantec 35 rue André‚ Malraux 41000 Blois Frankreich – France Tel. +33 (0)254432863 E-Mail: [email protected] = Redaktion: Le Macropode, CIL http://cil.france.free.fr/index.html Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Peter Finke Telgenbrink 79 33739 Bielefeld Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)5206-1466 Fax: +49 (0)5206-2838 E-Mail: [email protected] Geschäftsführer Bernd Bussler Joachim-Mähl-Strasse 15 22459 Hamburg Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)40-584703 Fax: +49 (0)40-54007517 E-Mail: [email protected] Kassier Guido Kox Jahnstrasse 52 58849 Herscheid Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)2357-3853 Mobil: +49 (0)171-8534260 E-Mail: [email protected] Webmaster Nora Brede Im Winkel 6 8478 Thalheim an der Thur Schweiz – Suisse Tel. E-Mail: [email protected] Fischwart Dr. Thomas Seehaus Lisztweg 2 64646 Heppenheim Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)6252-6448 Fax: +49 (0)69-31062627 E-Mail: [email protected] Regionalgruppen Redakteur Jörg Töpfer Hospitalweg 2 a 01589 Riesa Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)3525-630803 Fax: +49 (0)351-8336350 E-Mail: [email protected] Webmaster (Forum) Christian Kanele Brunngasse 3 8708 Männedorf Schweiz – Suisse Tel. 0041-763902430 E-Mail: [email protected] Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Bayern Dieter Dahms Tannenhofstrasse 2 85540 Haar Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)89-466842 E-Mail: [email protected] Bayerwald Dr. Jürgen Schmidt Bühlfelderweg 10 94239 Ruhmannsfelden Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)9929-903393 Email: [email protected] = Redaktion: Orchideenzauber, Aquarium Live Tel. +49 (0)9929-726000 www.orchideenzauber.eu Belgien Christian Eurlings Sint Sebastiaan Straat 2 2260 Westerlo Belgien – België Tel. +32 (0)14-548894 E-Mail: [email protected] 97 Berlin Marcus Ebert Ortolfstrasse 44 12524 Berlin Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)179-1696075 E-Mail: [email protected] Regio Basiliensis Achim Held Lindenstrasse 42 79639 Grenzach-Wylen Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)7624-8382 E-Mail: [email protected] Cottbus Holm Arndt Kunersdorfer Strasse 24 03099 Kolkwitz-Dahlitz Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)355-287864 E-Mail: Rhein-Main-Neckar Karl-Heinz Rossmann Kleingemünder Strasse 44 69118 Heidelberg Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)6221-801939 E-Mail: [email protected] Franken Martin Döring Schwedengarten 8 90411 Nürnberg Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)911-5401131 E-Mail: [email protected] Südwest Anke Binzenhöfer Wimsheimerstrasse 25-1 71297 Mönsheim Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)7044-920220 E-Mail: [email protected] Kölner Bucht Anja Stoffer Hahnenstrasse 33 50354 Hürth Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)1520-1839706 E-Mail: [email protected] Waterkant Bernd Bussler, siehe Geschäftsführer Niederlande Robbert Zuijdam Waterradmolen 47 1703 PB Heerhugowaard Niederlande – Nederland Tel. +31 (0)653489395 E-Mail: [email protected] Niedersachsen Andrea Rähr Brandenburgerstrasse 7 a 30855 Langenhagen Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)511-738344 E-Mail: [email protected] Nordostschweiz Alfred Waser Goldregenweg 8 8400 Winterthur Schweiz – Suisse Tel: +41 (0)52222883 E-Mail: [email protected] Nordrhein-Westfalen Pascal Antler Rechenacker 22 46049 Oberhausen Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)208-8690703 Mobil: +49 (0)176-86316314 E-Mail: [email protected] Österreich Bettina Seidl Grillparzerstrasse 16 4300 St. Valentin Österreich – Austria Tel. E-Mail: [email protected] Flösselaal, Flösselhechte, Lungenfische Jörg Töpfer, siehe Redakteur Nanderbarsche Rudolf Rucks Oppendorfer Weg 26 a 24149 Kiel Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)431-203996 E-Mail: [email protected] Medienstelle / Diaverkauf Guido Kox, siehe Kassierer Impressum ISSN 0037-177X Der Makropode© ist die offizielle Vereinszeitschrift der Internationalen Gemeinschaft für Labyrinthfische (IGL) mit Sitz in 58762 Altena (Deutschland – Germany). Die Zeitschrift erscheint im Selbstverlag der Gemeinschaft 4 x jährlich. Der Bezugspreis ist im IGL-Mitgliedsbeitrag enthalten. Redaktionsbeirat: Ralf Britz, Robert Donoso-Büchner, Stefan Inselmann, Michael Kokoscha, Anton Lamboj, Hans-Joachim Paepke, Jürgen Schmidt, Kai-Erik Witte. CIL-France Michel Dantec, siehe Vizepräsident Gestaltung und Hefterstellung der IGL Vereinszeitschrift Otto Tempel Burgstrasse 33 67157 Wachenheim Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)6322-8192 E-Mail: [email protected] Arbeitsgruppen Anabas, Buschfische Jürgen Schmidt Schulstrasse 18 02943 Weißwasser Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)3576-205100 E-Mail: [email protected] Betta AG Michael Scharfenberg Alte Strasse 236 50226 Frechen Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)2234-53154 Email: [email protected] Cotrips: Colisa, Pseudosphromenus, Trichogaster, Trichopsis Karl-Heinz Rossmann, siehe Regionalgruppe Rhein-Main-Neckar Literatur AG Bruno Urbanski Goslarerstrasse 54 47259 Duisburg Deutschland – Germany Tel. +49 (0)203-780224 E-Mail: [email protected] Macropodus Dr. Thomas Seehaus, siehe Fischwart Paros AG: Parosphromenus, Malpulutta Prof. Dr. Peter Finke, siehe Vizepräsident Druck und Versand Druckerei Kluge Lange Strasse 41 01587 Riesa Deutschland – Germany Namentlich gekennzeichnete Beiträge geben nicht unbedingt die Meinung der Redaktion wieder. Keine Haftung für eingereichtes Redaktionsmaterial. Alle Teile dieser Zeitschrift sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Art der Weiterverwertung nur mit schriftlicher Genehmigung von Redaktion und Autor (Labyrinth [AAGB] darf Beiträge vereinbarungsgemäß übernehmen). Wird über Pflanzen und Tiere berichtet, deren Besitz gesetzlichen Bestimmungen unterliegt, so bestätigt der Verfasser mit der Zuwendung seiner Arbeit an die Redaktion deren Einhaltung. Erscheinungsort ist 01587 Riesa (Deutschland – Germany). Es gilt das Pressegesetz des Freistaates Sachsen in seiner jeweils aktuellen Fassung. © IGL 2009 Bankverbindung: Badis, Dario Karl-Heinz Rossmann, siehe Regionalgruppe Rhein-Main-Neckar Deutsche Bank AG, Filiale D-79618 Rheinfelden, BLZ 683 700 24, Kto.-Nr. 1465269 00, IBAN: DE50 6837 0024 0146 5269 00, BIC: DEUTDEDB683 Channa AG Christian Kanele, siehe Webmaster IGL-Info im Internet: www.igl-home.de 98 Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 Macropodus hongkongensis P. senegalus, the normal form shows no black dots in the rear finlets. Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009 (Photo: Dr. J. Schmidt) (Photo: F. Schäfer) 99 Betta smaragdina, Nong Bua Lam Phu, Issan, Thailand Badis ruber 100 (Photo: M. Scharfenberg) (Photo: H. Linke) Der Makropode – Volume 31 – 2 / 2009