Folie 1 - INTER-Regio

www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
Rail Network Development
Jiří HRUBOŇ
KORID LK (CZ)
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF
This project is supported by the German Federal Transnational Cooperation programme
15.05.2013
1
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
Location of the Liberec region
Germany
15.05.2013
2
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
Characteristics of the Liberec region (1)

The second smallest region in the
Czech Republic (out of 13)

The capital of the Liberec Region is the
fifth biggest city in the Czech Republic

The high rate of unemployment,
especially in the peripheral parts of the
region (forces residents to commute to
work outside their hometowns)
The demand for public transport rises
15.05.2013
3
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Characteristics of the Liberec region (2)

Lacks connection to other crucial
railway corridors

The only regional capital in the
country which lacks a good quality
railway connection with Prague

The regional railway tracks are run
through a hilly, sometimes even
mountainous terrain

The regional railways suffer from longterm underinvestment


Outdated infrastructure contrasts with the increasing
quality of rolling stocks
Decrease in the railway’s competitiveness with other
means of transport
4
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Passenger rail transport stakeholders in
the Liberec region


Passenger rail authorities are:

The Liberec Region (regional trains)

The Ministry of transport (long-distance
trains – express trains)
KORID LK - coordinator of public
transport in the Liberec Region (not only
trains, but also buses, city transport)

Transport providers

Railway infrastructure manager
Coordinator
Ministry of
transport
The Liberec
Region
X
X
X
X
Infrastructure
manager
Transport
providers
The Liberec Region doesn’t have any contract with the
infrastructure manager
5
www.interregiorail.eu
Liberec
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
6
The goals of the KORID pilot
project

Increase in the competitiveness
of the railway in relation to
other means of transport

Retaining the passengers in the
system especially in routine
journeys to school and work

Development of the railway
network in harmony with
current trends, needs and limits
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Methods

Analysis of the current situation

Preparation of the transport concept

Setting conditions for realization of the concept

Sorting according to priorities and establishing a plan for each
railway line
Analysis
Concept
Conditions
Priorities
Output: Strategy for dealing with management of the Liberec
Region, Ministry of transport, the infrastructure manager and other
partners
The crucial precondition for success to avoid wasting energy
fighting over individual solutions is a consensus of opinion of
all main parties
7
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
8
Findings (1)
Establishing necessary
investments according to the
offered services and benefits

Lines with low potential
tender calls for the lowest
price, (low cost, basic quality)

Lines with a middle
potential better use of existing
possibilities, the proposal of
spot improvements and
organizational changes

Lines with a high potential
a major modernisation mostly
in a new track
Line
Potential
Liberec - Česká Lípa
Low
Liberec – Tanvald
Middle
Liberec - Mladá Boleslav (Praha) High
We now have data for dealing with investors
Investments
6 M€
40 M€
586 M€
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
9
Findings (2)

Some needs demand greatly lower costs than expected - much can
be achieved by organizational changes, modifications of the transport
concept (timetable), spot modernisations of intersection points
The example of the Liberec – Česká Lípa line
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
10
Findings (3)
The example of the Liberec – Praha line

Some needs demand significant
investment cost.

It is necessary to have project
planning in advance to block a new
route in regional plans and to prepare
projects for grant applications
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Transferability to other passenger rail authorities

Passenger rail authorities have to know about their needs on the
long-term horizon

The costs and benefits of the proposed measures have to be
quantified
Šluknov
39
Rumburk
38 26
21
22 34
směr Jelenia Góra - Wroclaw
3 57
16 43
Rybniště
7
Markvartice
Svor
Rynoltice
8
Benešov n.P.
49 bez ná roků
Česká Lípa hl.n.
S:12/L:20 L:58/L:03
L:58/L:03
L:37/S:33
L:42/S:36 L:56/S:52
L:58/S:53
S:19/L:21
S:14 L:40 X:27 X:31
Františkov n.
UL Západ
Ústí n.L.
Blíževedl
16
44 13 20 38 43 15
X:26
odj. S:30 X:34/(X:04) X:25/(X:55)
S:03/S:32 L:56/L:26
L:13/S:32 S:47/L:27
S:33 L:22
45 12
Žizníkov
55
S:40/L:16 L:20/S:43
bez ná roků
-
S:00/S:42
L:39/S:11 L:59/L:18
-
Turnov
S:20/L:09
odj. S:30
Železný Brod
L:42
S:01
S:17
L:30/S:40
S:29/L:20
S:30
L:29
X:34/(X:00)
M.B. - Pra ha : při
hodi novém
rychl ém
s egmentu
probl ematický
průvoz ml adobol eslavských Os
v ús eku Všetaty -
S:58/S:16
S:34/L:47
S:33/(L:46)
L:45/(S:49)
S:43/L:22
S:59/L:40
L:02/L:43
L:26/S:13
L:27/(S:14)
S:15/(L:10)
Náchod
Horka u
(Os/Os
Kuks!)
Hrubá Skála
Ml.Boleslav město
26
33
20 příj. L:40
39 odj. S:15
s měr Dol ní Bous ov
L:35 S:24
X:00
X:56
L:57
58
1
41
18
40
19
X:00 /X:14 X:59/X:49
13
30
29
X:02 X:54
31 28 L:58 S:00
43
X:06 /X:21 X:54/X:42
Neratovice
14 41
52 8
S:20 L:39
0 Ostroměř
53
2
0 57
Nymburk hl.n.
S:02
Lysá n. L.
57
X:59
X:58
Ba rtouš ov
Nevhodné dojezdové
ča s y s měr Turnov v
Ji číně.
Všetaty
Jičín
příj. L:23 X:21
X:37
odj. S:37
L:32 S:27
X:58/(X:44) X:02/(X:18)
1
58
Starkoč
L:14
S:46
S:16 L:44 L:16 S:44
29 28
Chotětov
Zhorš ení
konektivity pro
ná va zné tra tě v
Nera tovicích.
Jaroměř
L:00/S:18
S:45 L:15
X:27/(X:57)
Ml.Boleslav hl.n.
Kralupy n.Vlt.
Dvůr
23 32 Stará Paka
bez ná roků
L:16/S:36
Košťálov
Příl i š ostrá
přes tupní va zba
Turnov - Čes ká
Lípa v Ml a dé
Bol eslavi
Teplice n.M.
Tra ť 040:
preci zace modelu a potřeba
zkrá cení jízdních dob s ohledem
na technologii a návaznosti v
uzl ových s tanicích.
L:41/S:58 S:18/L:01
L:58
příj. L:25
Trutnov hl.n.
27 uzel v X:30
27
0 57
Velké
3
0 58
57
57
Hodkovice n.M.
L:20 -
V Turnově chybí
s ys témová va zba
pra žs kých R s měr Ji čín
a Li berec (lze Os/R)
0 Lovosice
58
55
Mnich.
Bezděz
Bakov n.J.
58
Kunčice n.L.
Tanvald
X:30 příj. L:25
S:22/L:24
- S:39
58
X:19/(X:49) X:30/(X:00)
L:35/S:31
odj. S:27
V Čes ké Lípě va zba
Mi moň-Doksy jen Os.
1
š pa tná návaznost
pra žs kých R na tra ť do
Ha rra chova v Ta nvaldě
X:24 X:29
příj. L:22
S:29 L:26 X:41 X:17
42
Liberec
S:20/L:22 L:37/S:37
Vesec
36
X:30/(X:00)
22
bez ná roků
směr FrýdlantS:57/(L:57) L:53/(S:53)
X:26/(X:56)
Děčín hl.n.
Harrachov
Mníšek
L:32/S:20
20
S:56 L:58
směr Hrádek n. N.
Jedlová
L:50/(S:50) -
50
vždy přes tup
S:28 S:24
Chrastava
- S:10/(L:10)
S:33/L:37
40
směr Cottbus
uzel 00
uzel v 30
29 31
30 bez ná roků
30
Železniční doprava severovýchodní
Čechy
MODEL LK
uzel v S:30Szklarska Poreba Górna
S:22/(L:22)
Smržovka
Koordi novat trasy
Os v ús eku Děčín
- Benešov n. P. a
Jedl ová -
S:25 S:36
L:38/(S:38)
S:20/(L:20)
17 43
L:40/(S:40)
bez ná roků
Zittau
Jablonec n. N.
Mikulášovice d.n.
Hradce Králové hl.n.
Nové Město
Hněvčeves
26 32 Chlumec n.C.
29
27
28
0
- při s tá vající ča sové poloze hradeckých R jen
obtížně řešitelná vazba M. Bol eslav - Hra dec
Krá l ové v Nymburce
-koordinovat trasy R v ús eku Nymburk - Velký
Os ek
- ji né návaznosti v uzl u Kolín
Kolín
S:29 L:31 L:29 S:31
4
53
Týniště
8
58
S:32 L:29 L:32 S:29
S:49 L:12 L:49 S:12
Pardubice hl.n.
Choceň
X:08/X:22 X:53/X:41
Měšice
Pra ha : X:47 X:09
The pilot project provides a strategy for the successful
targeting of all activities > model output
11
www.interregiorail.eu
|
[email protected]
15.05.2013
Thank you
for your attention
Contact Jiří HRUBOŇ
 [email protected]
12